Rhetorical Analysis of Gender-Based Violence Against Women Research Paper

Summary

Several researchers have delved into various aspects of the Gender-Based Violence Against Women (GBV) social problem. However, there is a distinction between researchers who apply rhetorical appeals to pass their rationale to the audience and those who do not (Bradbury-Jones 7). The reason is that research that applies rhetorical appeals to persuade the audience to build stronger arguments that supersede regular standard ratings. Examples of the rhetorical styles used in writing include logos, ethos, and pathos. The study intends to find distinguished research in six filtered studies that apply different rhetorical analysis techniques.

Beyond Domestic Violence Survivor Services by Marie

In her methodological article on domestic violence against violence, Marie explores the interventions placed by the US government in eradicating GBV. In the abstract, the author disapproves of the notion that GBV is steered by poverty and poor government programs to combat this violence (Marie para 1). Instead, she mentions that the policy consensus is the main problem, which attracts the reader’s attention because of the desire to understand how.

Marie posits that GBV is any “arbitrary deprivation of liberty primarily caused by ineffective policies that increase rights infringement (Marie para 2). The author sets the stage by giving an example of traditional theories created in the past to justify violence against women. For instance, she mentions that “the historical patterns that perpetuate GBV lead to an expectation of continued tolerance of GBV as well as the benefits (privilege, power, control over women) derived from such tolerance” (Marie para 19). This statement fulfills the pathos stake because it highlights how poor policies and notions have continued to support this patriarchy and violence, making the reader saddened by this state of affairs.

Additionally, she presents a lengthy quantitative analysis of the prevalence of GBV globally, with specific emphasis on US states. Marie mentions that globally, one-third of all women in the Americas have been victims of gender-based violence (Marie para 2). This data builds credibility because facts are presented from reputable sources justifying its ethos use. Furthermore, the presented data showcases that GBV is dangerous to society because the worst cases related to death have been reported in different states.

Throughout the article, the author uses various sources to prove his rationale for the rampant global surge in GBV and the impact of weak policies. These sources include the Community Economic Ventures, Inc. (CEVI) report and the national reports to the Assembly of Delegates to the OAS Commission of women (Marie para 10). Data retrieved from these sources are reliable, fulfilling the logos appeal, which is credibility. However, the data of policies provided is outdated, which is a limitation in the study because it degrades the ethos appeal. For instance, the data presented indicating the policies available in various states in the US were published in 2012, meaning that it does not meet the standards for this research.

GBV Against Women and Girls by World Bank Group

Further, the World Bank Group presents an online article addressing GBV by presenting convincing statistics on the prevalence of GBV in the world. It is indicated that “35% of women have experienced physical or sexual violence in their lifetime” (para 1). This factor fulfills the pathos because it showcases the intensity of its occurrence. Further, they explain that GBV affects a country’s social-economic status, and failure to deal with the menace could significantly impact the future. Annually, GBV costs countries close to 3.7 % of their GDP (World Bank Group para 2). This results in a decline in living standards across the affected countries.

Another valid argument is that GBV knows no borders because it affects women across all social-economic boundaries meaning that it occurs in developed and underdeveloped countries (World Bank Group para 5). This rationale satisfies the logos because the claim is relevant evidence that is appropriate to this topic. However, the subsequent paragraphs focus on addressing the organization’s achievements in fighting GBV, which indicates the loss of focus on the main topic, “Gender-Based Violence Against Women and Girls. “This shift weakens the ethos appeal because it deviates from the initial argument. In addition, the research can be called cyclical, making this source a weak study to be used in research.

Understanding Gender-Based Violence by Bradbury-Jones

The book “Understanding Gender-Based Violence is a classical guide by a renowned researcher that addresses various dynamics of GBV. All chapters in this book have other researchers’ contributions to the topic making the book unbiased and successfully employing the ethical appeal, which is ethos. For instance, chapter one of the book incorporates ideas from Finn Mackay, which brings a diverse perspective on the issue of GBV (Bradbury-Jones 6). Mackay introduces what feminists want, including respect, equal pay, opportunities and independence. If these considerations are fulfilled, GBV can be eradicated because women will be able to stand up for themselves and defend what is ethical.

The author uses empirical research by presenting different rationales from other experts based on their observation and measurement of different phenomena, comparing it with the claims stated, adding to the ethos appeal. For instance, feminist scholars based in the UK claim that “male sexual violence against women is the trigger to maintaining social governance” (Bradbury-Jones 7). Such statements create logos and ethos, which enhance the readers’ understanding of that topic. Generally, this book is analytical because the critical analysis of all data created intensifies the interpretation and is an excellent resource for this study.

What is considered Gender-Based Violence (GBV)by Otto

In her online post on GBV, Ott applies various rhetorical techniques to persuade her audience to accept her rationale for GBV. The introduction of the blog begins with a statement containing Anadiplosis, “Gender-based violence (GBV) is violence that is directed at an individual based on their gender identity” (Ott para 1). Violence is repeated in the sentence to emphasize or intensify the significance of what is being addressed. This language applies ethos, which is significant in enhancing focus where needed.

Another strategy used is statistical inclusion, whereby data on the affected women emphasizes the prevalence of this menace. Authors use data to add sophistication and authenticity to their work. The representation of facts also enhances credibility, which is integral in enhancing logos (Ott para 1). Finally, the pathos appeal is utilized well because the author identifies the consequences of GBV, including “unwanted pregnancies, unsafe abortions, STI transmission, and depression. Which are consequences that evokes emotions” (Ott para 4). However, ethos is not addressed because the work is not cited, meaning that the ideas presented cannot be confirmed and hence, not suitable for use as a research source.

Lessons Never Learned by Neetu John

“Lessons never learned about GBV” is a journal article that addresses mistakes that have become dominant in the war against this violence. Lack of enough education, social service agencies, and non-functional policies are all drawbacks to eradicating this violence. The author debuted by providing a statistical analysis of the trends in the occurrence of GBV and a review of the impact of the drawback. For instance, 1 in 3 women who have been in a relationship has experienced GBV (Neetu John para 3). This information is used to bolster the claim that the limitations contribute to a surge in GBV. Therefore, it also promotes the logos appeal in the rhetorical study.

This article discusses the COVID-19 pandemic and gender-based violence (GBV) in the context of lessons learned from previous emergencies, such as the Ebola crisis, to avoid future blunders. This intervention will advocate for the inclusion of women in all COVID-19 decision-making processes. The examples given of the prevalence of GBV during the Ebola and Covid-19 pandemics evoke sad emotions considering both states of affairs are devastating to the woman’s welfare (Neetu John para 3). This statement and analysis express the pathos appeal, which is an excellent tool in the rhetorical study approach. The author also includes citations at the end of the journal to ensure that the ethos appeal is fulfilled. However, the citations are not referenced because the works cited have no detailed work connecting word by word to their respective citation creating a limitation in the ethos approach. Therefore, this journal is also limited as a research source and cannot be applied to this study.

Entitled: How male privilege hurts women by Manne

Lastly, Kate Manne, author of a classical book on GBV, explores the dynamics of patriarchy in the fight against GBV. In a sad but comical story, the author explores a rape case ignored in the high court based on considerations of male privilege (Manne 9). This story sets hurtful emotions and regrets on the systems that allow impartial justice, fulfilling the pathos appeal (Manne 9). The author’s use of literary devices is top-notch because there is a sophisticated combination of various rhetorical strategies such as apophasis, strong diction and similes to draw the audience’s attention and achieve the logos appeal in the process.

The first device used is apophasis, a literacy similar to irony “I cannot imagine what you and your family have gone through, Boy, you all want power (Manne 10).” The book is also rich in complex jargon, which shows the author is proficient in English literacy. Such words include misogyny, inscrutability and egalitarianism, which are known to fewer audiences. Phrases such as “they’ve all treated me like a mouse” contain a simile, a literacy device used to spice the message (Manne 20). This book is the best option for a research paper because it highlights various rhetorical devices such as ethos, logos and pathos in addition to other works.

Works Cited

Bradbury-Jones, Caroline, and Louise Isham, (eds). Understanding Gender-Based Violence: An Essential Textbook for Nurses, Healthcare Professionals and Social Workers. Springer Nature, 2021. Web.

Manne, Kate. Entitled: How male privilege hurts women. Crown, 2020.

Marie Choup, Anne. “Beyond Domestic Violence Survivor Services: Refocusing on Inequality in the Fight against Gender‐Based Violence in the Americas.”Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol 35.4, 2016, pp. 452-466. Web.

Neetu John, et al. “Lessons Never Learned: Crisis and Gender‐Based Violence.”Developing world bioethics, vol.20, 2021.pp 65-68. Web.

Ott, Meghan. “Gender-Based Violence (GBV) Includes Physical, Sexual, Verbal, Emotional, And Psychological Abuse, Threats, Coercion, and Economic or Educational Deprivation.” Women for Women International 2021, Web.

World Bank Group. “Gender-Based Violence (Violence Against Women and Girls).”World Bank, 2021, Web.