Introduction
The review of the article represents an outlook on how to design papers so that to correspond applicable techniques and approaches as of correct depiction of information. Format characteristics are also vital for academic models. To create an outline one should take into account the structure of a definite type within provided outlines. Thus, it is significant to promote the identification of the subject matter. Second, it is proposed to make an analysis. Third, one should discuss findings. Particularly detailed glimpses designate the importance of some general quotations, comments, or definitions. For the main body, it is useful to give proper evidence about the problem along with the historical cut or background within which one can underline accuracy in research. Finally, the conclusion should restate the prevailing standpoint and provide some assumptions as for the probable recommendations.
For making advances in the paper it is appropriate to follow a particular structured design, namely: introduction (representation of the problem with the significance of it supported by the background information highlighted with the compelling thesis); Body (an estimation of the main points about the problem; examination in a historical overlook; comparison and analysis of different authoritative opinions); conclusion (pros and cons of the theory being analyzed; recommendations and further implementation of the theory).
Instructions for writing papers academically
For the artwork there is another way to organize the paper: Introduction (work itself with an executive summary, background information and biographical facts about main actors, characters, or players with citations and thesis statement at the end); body (evaluative analysis with more glimpses at imagery theme psychological or historical portraits of main characters, narration, symbolic implementation, etc.); conclusion (restatement of the artists’ in action with hints on the supposed contributions regarding the thesis).
For persuasive writing, it is vital to building up a convenient and rather strong argumentative base in order to support the paper. For this purpose, a writer should admit the following model: introduction (concise evaluation of the problem by only one sentence problem, summary, posing terminology, proper concessions, additional quotations and paraphrases, thesis); body (elaboration of arguments, analysis of problem in terms of its advantages and limitations, representation of facts out of references); conclusion (thesis with more applicable evidence, personal position, reflections).
For writing on social problems concerned with politics or history with a complex of sharp data about events, time prospects and outcomes, it is better to confirm the next plan: introduction (event as it is, historical survey, quotations and paraphrases, thesis); body (analysis of the framework about the event, making parallels with other epochs or events, provision of chronology, citation of experts in the proper field); conclusion (reaffirmation of the thesis, discussion of effects).
For the compare/contrast analysis it is important to include the following structure: introduction (each compared side’s estimation, brief comparison of them, central issue, review of sources, thesis); body (examination of both sides of the discussion, detailed compare/contrast analysis with points on the central issues); conclusion (discussion of the paper significance, ranking conclusion with an outlook on both sides, conclusion underlining the genuine character of each side).
Every paper needs an outline
All papers are to be highlighted with the outline so that to help an observer or reader to become familiar with the main points of the discussion. In this respect, it will be convenient to cover the standpoints from the very beginning. An alleged draft of the paper can be represented with an excellent outline.
Works cited
Lester, James D. and Lester, Jim. Writing Research Papers. New York: Barnes and Noble, 2009.