Sanctions for Judges Necessity Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda®
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

Even though judges’ function is to hear cases and decide who is guilty, they can misbehave by themselves. It refers to those situations when these officials fail to follow the highest standards of professional conduct, leading to specific issues. In such cases, sanctions should be applied to judges, but many experts state that this practice is underutilized. Thus, the paper will explain that the necessity to sanction a judge depends on the type of their misconduct and describe how these measures should be implemented.

It is possible to find different types of judges’ misconduct. Hartley et al. (2017) state that these wrongful practices include exhibiting prejudice in evidentiary rulings, aggravating or mitigating sentences, and accepting bribes. Simultaneously, it is reasonable to consider less impactful examples such as inexperience, harmful errors, court delays, and disparate sentences (Hartley et al., 2017). There is no doubt that these types of misconduct can imply different consequences, meaning that they should invoke appropriate sanctions. I believe that sanctions should be imposed in those cases when judges’ behavior affects decisions. For example, it refers to accepting bribes, modifying sentences, and expressing prejudice. It seems that establishing discipline commissions is an optimal strategy to punish judges because these bodies can monitor their activity and determine whether misconduct is present. Such commissions can also be effective in identifying whether sanctions are required for minor issues.

In conclusion, sanctions are necessary when judges’ misconduct leads to severe consequences implying, for example, that a guilty individual can escape punishment. In this case, discipline commissions are suitable to oversee judges’ professional activity and implement sanctions. Furthermore, such bodies are helpful since they can draw attention to minor mistakes and determine whether they deserve sanctions. Thus, the type of misconduct indicates whether and what sanctions should be implemented.

Reference

Hartley, R. D., Rabe, G. A., & Champion D. J. (2017). Criminal courts: Structure, process, and issues (4th ed.). Pearson.

Print
More related papers
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, July 29). Sanctions for Judges Necessity. https://ivypanda.com/essays/sanctions-for-judges-necessity/

Work Cited

"Sanctions for Judges Necessity." IvyPanda, 29 July 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/sanctions-for-judges-necessity/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Sanctions for Judges Necessity'. 29 July.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Sanctions for Judges Necessity." July 29, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/sanctions-for-judges-necessity/.

1. IvyPanda. "Sanctions for Judges Necessity." July 29, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/sanctions-for-judges-necessity/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Sanctions for Judges Necessity." July 29, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/sanctions-for-judges-necessity/.

Powered by CiteTotal, best essay citation creator
If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
Cite
Print
1 / 1