Scientific Integrity: The Stanford Prison Experiment Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Introduction

It is important to note that groupthink, obedience, and compliance are significant elements of stability as well as exploitation in modern society. The given analysis will focus on the Stanford prison experiment, which made major claims about the human tendency to become violent when put in a position of power. The most important lesson drawn from the experiment is that scientific integrity is essential in the process of collecting evidence.

The Experiment

The Stanford prison experiment was conducted by dividing a group of participants into prison guards and prisoners. In 1971, Zimbardo with colleagues conducted an experiment where they found that guards became aggressive and dominant despite the fact that they were playing the role (McLeod, 2020). The prisoners became abused, dehumanized, and forced to endure cruelties as a result of the guards’ actions, which led to many ethical concerns (Stanford Libraries, 2022). However, today, the criticism is primarily aimed at the experiment’s integrity since reputable experts and scientists concluded that the Stanford prison experiment was most likely biased, misperceived, and even staged (Le Texier, 2019). Thus, one can conclude that the experiment should not be used to draw conclusions about groupthink, obedience, and compliance. A more important lesson is that non-credible scientific experiments can be accepted as facts for a long time before they are debunked.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Stanford prison experiment is not about groupthink, obedience, and compliance but rather scientific integrity. From the start, the study was heavily criticized, and rightly so, because it conveyed a strong message on human nature with many ethical concerns about its design. At that moment, it became even more apparent that the experiment was heavily biased, unethical, flawed, and invalid to use as evidence.

References

Le Texier, T. (2019). . American Psychologist, 74(7), 823–839. Web.

McLeod, S. (2020). . Simply Psychology. Web.

Stanford Libraries. (2022). Exhibition highlights 40th anniversary of the Stanford prison experiment. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2023, September 3). Scientific Integrity: The Stanford Prison Experiment. https://ivypanda.com/essays/scientific-integrity-the-stanford-prison-experiment/

Work Cited

"Scientific Integrity: The Stanford Prison Experiment." IvyPanda, 3 Sept. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/scientific-integrity-the-stanford-prison-experiment/.

References

IvyPanda. (2023) 'Scientific Integrity: The Stanford Prison Experiment'. 3 September.

References

IvyPanda. 2023. "Scientific Integrity: The Stanford Prison Experiment." September 3, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/scientific-integrity-the-stanford-prison-experiment/.

1. IvyPanda. "Scientific Integrity: The Stanford Prison Experiment." September 3, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/scientific-integrity-the-stanford-prison-experiment/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Scientific Integrity: The Stanford Prison Experiment." September 3, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/scientific-integrity-the-stanford-prison-experiment/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1