Objective discussion of sexual harassment and mishandling of assaulters
Sexual harassment and mishandling of assaulters have become common especially in the modern world. The cases are being reported among individuals of diverse cultural settings and college students. The vice has been in the increase among these groups of people due to the acute moral decay and inconsistent adherence to ethical principles that foster social integration (Kingkade, 2013). This explains why tough measures or rules are being adopted in colleges purposely to curb the rising cases of sexual harassment, especially between students and lecturers. The tough rules that are set with the objective of restoring sanity among stakeholders have made college officials be accused of mishandling sexual assaulters. This is evident since the rules propose tough measures to sexual assaulters whether they are students or staff members. The measures include express termination, revocation of staff member status or studentship, and heavy fines including jail terms. According to Loeb (2013), the measures have been developed in various settings including colleges to ensure that sanity prevails among citizens. Their aim is to ensure that citizens are able to embrace each other in a respectful manner.
Various perspectives on the issue and logical framework
Indeed, sexual harassment is a criminal activity that is impeding social and economic integration in most settings. It requires mitigation through the adoption of conventional measures that are legally enforceable. This is important since the crime exposes victims to severe effects that compromise their performance. Notably, it is true that most students in many colleges have been victims of sexual harassment from teachers and fellow learners (Gleiser, 2011). It is also true that the assaulters are being mishandled as reported in some literature because of the stringent nature of the punishment that they are subjected to. However, stringent measures are aimed at curbing the spread of sexual victimization. They can be deemed negatively but they form part of the solutions to sexual harassment that is ailing development in our societies. Therefore, it is prudent for individuals not to view the enforceability of the measures as mishandling of sexual assaulters.
Personal stand with reference to the topic
Ideally, it is important and necessary for colleges to develop stringent measures to curb the rising cases of sexual harassment among students and lecturers. The measures that include the jailing of assaulters, relieving them of their duties among others are credible control measures (Karmen, 2013). The measures should be viewed positively and not as coercive in any nature. That is they should not be deemed as measures to mishandle sexual assaulters. Notably, the measures are fair in consideration of the criminal nature of sexual offenses that present far-reaching effects that compromise an individual’s performance. Therefore, the only way to restore sanity and ensure holistic mitigation of sexual harassment is through the imposition of tough rules.
Conclusion
Indeed, the introduction of stringent measures and punishment for sexual offenders has been instrumental in restoring sanity in most colleges. The measures have enhanced the safety of vulnerable individuals in colleges such as women by ensuring systematic eradication of sexual harassment that has been impeding social integration and understanding among students. Despite the nobleness of the measures, they have subjected some of the assaulters in colleges to immense mistreatment. This justifies the reason why critics of the control measures think that they lead to the mishandling of the assaulters. However, this reasoning is considered flawed especially in modern times since sexual assault remains a horrific ordeal that presents far-reaching effects to victims.
References
Gleiser, M. (2011). Globalization: Two Visions of the Future of Humanity. Web.
Kingkade, T. (2013). Sexual Assaults Mishandled at Dartmouth, Swarthmore, USC, Complaints Say. Web.
Karmen, A. (2013). Crime Victims: an Introduction to Victimology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Loeb, P. (2013). Service Learning Projects: “Soul of a Citizen” The Impossible will Take a Little While. Web.