Evidence in a Rogerian Argument
Social media are potentially dangerous because of the same features that make digital networks positive in individuals’ lives. Children and young adults perceive social media websites to be very good and can be pushed to join them. There are no dangers on the websites that do not emerge anywhere else online already. In an innovative online space with which members of society are unfamiliar, there is a danger. Like most possible online hazards, problems can begin if data is not monitored correctly. For instance, cyberbullying is allowed by anonymity (Uhls et al. 69). This inconvenience is particularly problematic for teenagers because perpetrators can target and take prey without assuming responsibility for susceptible high school students. Stalking could also be a problem because netizens sometimes can share their location, making it easier for the bullies to monitor their habits quickly.
For constructional reasons, social media bring together people who are dissatisfied, disappointed, and misguided, fosters bad ideas and perceptions further, or even increases the possibility of such things as coordinated terror acts. Children and adolescents are particularly vulnerable to adverse effects associated with innovative advances (Uhls et al. 68). They have been brought up on the Net, social media, and digital innovations, so that these things are an increasingly important feature. Youngsters are also impressive, eager to accept, and comparatively unfamiliar, and can judge by the cloud. The majority of adults nowadays consider what the world was like before introducing the internet, social networks, and portable devices. However, there have been problems, particularly for grownups susceptible to addiction or mental health problems.
Additionally, the emergence of the social media podia promotes the spread of false and unreliable information. In social networks and beyond, the problem of propaganda and misinformation is now critically important. Anyone who finds an incorrect statement on social media may spread it actively by sharing otherwise (Uhls et al. 69). When its creators first post disinformation online, one way of applying it is via the actions of each user of digital networking. Ordinary people can spread information through deliberate sharing on their social networks–a core component of platforms like Facebook and Twitter. However, because the issue is so widespread, the possibility of misleading information in action is relatively rare. Most users who produce misinformation also do not share correct information, so the impact of false news itself can be complex to interpret.
People on social media are more anxious than ever since they spend their time on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. It also leads to severe problems with mental health, including anxiety and depression. Misinformation about current news could lead to the possible causes of undesirable stress. It helps to understand whether the application of digital media is stressful. More information now than ever flows into people’s lives — much of it is distressing and difficult (Uhls et al. 68). Other disruptions and distractions are available. People can now more easily track what friends, frenzies, and enemies do and keep track of raises and falls almost constantly. They can now more easily track what acquaintances, agitations, and enemies do and keep track of their rises and falls almost constantly. The revealing of personal information presents more external pressure to digital media users. These innovations are designed to overcome human lives, generate time and societal pressures, putting people at risk of the negative impacts of stress on their wellbeing.
Notably, regulating the use of the various digital communication podia will play a crucial role in reducing the adversities associated with the inventions. Instead, society will benefit from the use of the different online platforms. For instance, in the digital public sphere of the 21st century, internet giants are vital institutions. Without trustable and dependable institutions governed by public and professional standards, a public realm does not function correctly. Internet regulation aims to encourage internet service providers to become responsible and trusted institutions to support a cheerful and energetic digital public arena. Users can contour what individuals consider, presume, and do by controlling the data and disseminating knowledge. Thus, it is possible to reduce the negative consequences associated with uncontrolled social media applications.
Toulmin Method Argument
On the positive side, the availability of alternative social media promotes relationship building. The way individuals communicate today is changing with social media. It is to one’s most significant advantage to be aware of every new way of managing their reputation online. The online community promoters of social networking websites claim that they promote enhanced association with family and friends, offering valuable welfare opportunities and materials for teachers, library staff, and students, facilitating political and social change, and disseminating practical information quickly. Community members can connect and voice their opinions with a broad spectrum of target audiences with their personal views about different subjects. The social network sharing function allows an immense number of individuals to express their opinions on any topic. People have the advantage of making groups with like-minded people who share related stories and ask for their views or insights on the subject (Uhls et al. 68). Societies can expand their professional network enormously online from a professional point of view by contacting colleagues, role models, mentors, and other specialists. If people cultivate these relationships, they have a completely new network to use when looking for possibilities or professional advice.
Controlled use of digital communication channels helps boost a community’s mental wellbeing. The companionship of others is essential to individuals’ lives, making humans social beings. Besides, the association has excellent repercussions on their mental health and happiness because our connections are vital. Self-worthiness can be improved, comforted and joyous, prevent stolenness, and even bring more years of life if one is socially connected with others. Many of us have access to social media sites in the present era, including Snapchat, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube. It is important to recall that social networking is not a substitute for actual human connections, though each has its advantages. It requires cooperation with others at personal levels to trigger hormones that reduce stress and leave you feeling happy, healthier, and better. Ironically, spending lots of time on media platforms could make a person feel lonely and separate—and exacerbate psychological problems such as anguish and depression—on a technology that is supposed to bring people together.
The introduction of new social media platforms is crucial for boosting the educational goals of their users. The use of technology in education enables students to obtain more information, interact with educational groups or other systems that facilitate teaching. Networking site tools provide multiple opportunities for participants and entities to strengthen methods of learning. All stakeholders, such as children, teachers, and students, are empowered. Online tools are an efficient way of sharing information and community building. One study shows that YouTube, Snapchat, and Instagram are among teenagers’ best-known online platforms (Uhls et al. 68). Others use it only for entertainment purposes, but it can also encourage excellent and valuable operations. For example, learners use the best software to search for information, promote positive stories, share helpful anything, and participate in projects.
Controlled use of social media can help business people realize their aims of beating their significant competitors for the limited market. Digital networks are not only about customers’ online retailers. Indeed, social media is rooted in the connection between people and people. Businesses have noticed and used various techniques to market their brand the benefits of online networks in the population’s lives. Several custom apps are produced on online platforms with the main aim of promoting the brand or product. As social media marketing is economical and advertisers have an enormous audience, they move more into social marketing (Uhls et al. 68). Social media could be a reliable and straightforward way to launch a marketing strategy with a significant impact with a minimum investment. An excellent digital system should contain an intelligent mix of interactive content or a responsive ‘person’ who can develop a focused public that wants to see the products, services, and brands of their own and advise other companies.
Increased online spending hours may be linked to both addictions and cyberbullying. In recent years, online cyberbullying has become an important topic for young people and social media. But approximately two-thirds say that racially insensitive, misogynistic, homophobic, or religious hate content is often or occasionally found on social media. Unintended stressors from social media cause most teens psychological problems. Although the innovative communication approaches might have negative consequences for the systems’ users, regulating the use of the digital communication tools will help in guaranteeing that they enjoy the associated benefits instead.
Methods Comparison
I consider the Rogerian argument model to be more effective and easy to write compared to the Toulmin argument. The Rogerian discussion aims to create a cooperative situation between two or more arguing parties. One advantage of the idea of Roger would be that the author or speaker receives the audience’s attention and helps prevent them from reasoning in opposition immediately. In all this, most individuals are sensible because of incomplete knowledge or contextually incomplete position disparities. This theoretical viewpoint assumes that many differences in opinion misunderstand the generally good position of the other party. It acknowledges that most conceptual discrepancies are terminological misinterpretations or misuse (Aqeel et al. 181). The downside is that it takes a lot of work to put ego, empathy, caring for other factions, graciousness, and inventiveness aside. Thus, arguing in such a format makes me value the opinions of the opposing side and ensures that I develop a broader viewpoint when it comes to the issues associated with social media.
However, although the Toulmin model made me present my arguments regarding the benefits associated with using the various social media channels, debaters considering this structure tend to disregard the opinions of the perceived critiques. This type of argument is used when solutions to problems and problems are unclear or absolute, with the sophistication of the contexts taken into account (Aqeel et al. 182). It enables you to assess in detail how each component of your argument works, whether in seclusion and accordance with the others, indicating that the Toulmin method is applicable. Thus, I would consider the Rogerian model because of its inclusive and neutral approach to arguing controversial topics such as social media’s significance.
Works Cited
Aqeel, Asim, et al. “Logical Reasoning and Fallacious in Post Graduate Research in Pakistan.” Pakistan Journal of Society, Education and Language (PJSEL), vol. 6, no.1, 2020, pp. 178-201.
Uhls, Yalda T., et al. “Benefits and Costs of Social Media in Adolescence.” Pediatrics, vol. 2, 2017, pp. S67-S70.