The case analysis started with the presentation of a 40-year-old woman who was given a RA diagnosis 18 months prior. She had been doing well on her medication regime for more than a year when she came in for a follow-up selection with her well-being expert because she began facing flare-ups two months ago that were accompanied by hand pain and edema (“PRIME® Clinical Case Study,” n.d.). The patient had a promotion during the same period as her arc and was experiencing significant pressure at work.
The study also covered the epidemiological and pathophysiology of RA and looked at data linking psychological trauma to the emergence and aggravation of the clinical disease. According to the available research, perceived stress of any kind was linked to an annoyance or severity of RA signs such as edema and discomfort in the joints, increased synovial inflammation, and alterations in the degrees of inflammatory indicators (“PRIME® Clinical Case Study,” n.d.). The goal of the example reading was to determine whether developmental therapies that address stresses may substantially decrease disease severity and manifestations and enhance the patient’s quality of life in light of these findings relating RA symptoms to stress levels.
These were the major conclusions from the study on the impact of various behavioral and psychological approaches to stress mitigation that McCray and Agarwal analyzed in a 2011 study. First, p psychological and behavioral stress reduction techniques cannot replace a standard treatment plan for patients with reasonable to more severe RA (“PRIME® Clinical Case Study,” n.d.). Secondly, nonpharmacological therapies can lessen illness symptoms when employed as supplemental therapy. Finally, future study is essential to evaluate the advantages of both behavior and mental stress treatments.
Sampling Method
Focused model size was executed, a subset of the non-sampling strategy. The greatest predominant tactic is the one selected, in which respondents are carefully chosen grounded on pre-determined benchmarks, which includes tracing and choosing personalities who are skillful concerning or have particular knowledge with a subject of concern (Chien, 2019). The experimental participants in this subject were chosen since they all had a problem-solving of RA and were partaking in a non – pharmacologic, behavioral strain reduction program.
Concerns Regarding Reliability and Validity
The extent to which the apparatus assesses what it is designed to consider is a significant criterion in reviewing an experiment. It is typically described as the following inquiry: “To what notch do the study conclusions provide the correct response?” distinction and reliability identical to repeatability, consistency, and trustworthiness. The idea is that any significant outcome must be necessarily reproducible. Concerning validity, the scenario learning has some apprehensions because the metrics being studied need to indicate definitively what they are trying to measure (Chien, 2019). When the impacts of developmental distress treatments on RA patients were inspected, the outcomes showed a decrease in pressure, worry, and, to a slighter degree, the client’s ability to cope discomfort.
Some studies indicate a decrease in musculoskeletal problems, but they were unpredictable. The study also has dependability problems, as the findings are not frequently reproduced (Chien, 2019). When the outcomes of developmental stress reduction treatments were scrutinized, it was learnt that specific categories of patients displayed some changes in their signs while others did not. The current works yields inconsistent consequences. Further study is needed to define the direct influence of anxiety on RA manifestations advantages patients get from pharmacologic and nonpharmacological stress management
Defects and Inconsistencies in the Study
This writer contends that complications and illogicalities were apparent from the beginning of this examination. An underlying reason for the study of alleged RA pathogenic causes should have been encompassed while identifying the connection amid stress and RA. Moreover, the norms of dependability and validity are vital pillars of investigation (Chien, 2019). As stated in the previous portion of this report, this study has concerns with both relevance and consistency. The survey did not disregard additional fundamental linkages, did not use panels, and provided unpredictable results, considering the study unlawful and undependable.
References
Chien, L.-Y. (2019). Evidence-based practice and nursing research. Journal of Nursing Research, 27(4), 50–59. Web.
PRIME® Clinical Case Study: Stress management for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. (n.d.) Web.