Successful and Unsuccessful First-Movers Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

In the context of business, economics, or marketing, a first-mover is considered the first entity to enter a specific market or industry, hence having a significant impact in the segment in terms of market share, expertise and customer loyalty (Mellahi & Johnson, 2000). Notably, Coca Cola can be considered a successful first-mover for acquiring superior brand recognition with its introduction of the first cola product in 1886, while Xerox can be considered an unsuccessful first-mover in its fax machines (Hill & Jones, 2013). Using the two companies, the present paper attempts to illuminate the similarities and differences of successful and unsuccessful first-movers.

Among the similarities, it can be argued that both successful and unsuccessful first-movers are engaged in being the first to enter a specific market or industry. Another similarity is based on the fact that both successful and unsuccessful first-movers may be large organizations with an established brand name, implying that even large companies are exposed to failure (Melahi & Johnson, 2000).

In discussing the differences, it is evident that successful first-movers are able to use their strong brand names, considerable financial resources and exceptional marketing expertise to make the most of their first-mover status, while unsuccessful first-movers are unable to employ such capabilities and resources to sustain their first-mover status (Suarez & Lanzolla, 2005). For example, while Coca Cola was able to employ the mentioned capabilities and resources to ensure a strong brand name for its cola product and accumulate enough market share, expertise and customer loyalty to remain on top, Xerox failed to achieve and sustain the top position even after being the first company to bring fax machines into the market due to incapacity to utilize its unique capabilities and resources.

The second difference is predicated upon the pace at which the technology of the product and/or service is evolving (Suarez & Lanzolla, 2005). Going back to the examples, Coca Cola was able to put in place mechanisms and strategies that ensured the technology of the cola product evolved at a faster rate than that of its competitors, thereby dominating the product category for many years. On the contrary, Xerox failed to ensure that the technology of its fax machines evolved at a faster rate than that of competitors, hence was unable to sustain the market for a long time.

The third difference is to a large extent influenced by the pace at which the market for the product and /or service is increasing (Abel, 2008). While in the case of Coca Cola there was fast growing expansion rate and massive new market potentials for its cola product, hence enabling the company to become a successful first-mover in that realm, Xerox was faced with low market expansion and low acceptance of its fax machines and, therefore, became an unsuccessful first-mover. Consequently, the pace at which the market of a particular product is expanding determines if a business entity will become a successful first-mover or not.

Lastly, another difference between the two is embedded in the fact that a successful “first mover has the opportunity to exploit network effects and positive feedback loops, locking consumers in its technology” (Hill & Jones, 2013 p. 244). For example, Coca Cola was able to utilize network effects and positive feedback loops to generate a massive consumer base at a global level, hence becoming a successful first-mover for its cola product despite stiff competition from other players. On the contrary, Xerox was unable to lock its customers in its technology (fax machines), thus provided adequate ground for competitors in the industry to take over.

Drawing from this exposition, it can be concluded that an organization’s capabilities, resources, rate of technology and market share growth, and exploitation of network effects are instrumental in deciding its success as a first mover. However, it is not guaranteed that such a company will become successful even in the presence of these components.

References

Abel, I. (2008). The Apple iPod: Succeeding where others have failed. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Web.

Hill, C., & Jones, G. (2013). Strategic management: An integrated approach (10th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning. Web.

Mellahi, K., & Johnson, M. (2000). Does it pay to be a first mover in e-commerce? The case of Amazon.com. Management Decision, 38(7), 445-452. Web.

Suarez, F., & Lanzolla, G. (2005). . Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2020, May 14). Successful and Unsuccessful First-Movers. https://ivypanda.com/essays/successful-and-unsuccessful-first-movers/

Work Cited

"Successful and Unsuccessful First-Movers." IvyPanda, 14 May 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/successful-and-unsuccessful-first-movers/.

References

IvyPanda. (2020) 'Successful and Unsuccessful First-Movers'. 14 May.

References

IvyPanda. 2020. "Successful and Unsuccessful First-Movers." May 14, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/successful-and-unsuccessful-first-movers/.

1. IvyPanda. "Successful and Unsuccessful First-Movers." May 14, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/successful-and-unsuccessful-first-movers/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Successful and Unsuccessful First-Movers." May 14, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/successful-and-unsuccessful-first-movers/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1