It is logical to remind the universe that it is in a statutory state of anarchy. There has never been such a thing as an international government. There is also not enough interdependence and division of labour among countries to transition international interactions into a domestic social structure. Under the present conditions, there are only three ways to keep the anarchy system from devolving into chaos: the conventional balance based upon power, nuclear deterrence, and central coalition governance. Throughout the past two centuries, every system has existed at varying periods. During most of the 19th and early 20th centuries, the power balances remained in place. At its best, it was such an ineffective mechanism that it didn’t automatically balance power dynamics. It also sparked battles in the twentieth century. Countries found it easier to respond convincingly to a hostile power under this approach. Whereas the system attempted to reduce violence, it never appropriately addressed large countries’ aggressive practices. The primary objective of this paper is to give a concise discussion based on the world concerts based on the 21st century where six member countries, Japan, China, the U.S., EU, and India, are introduced. Regarding this, the paper discusses the citizen’s best hopes as a result of the world concerts, the disqualifying weakness due to the absence of fallbacks regarding global concerts, a comparison between the advantages and the disadvantages of the world concerts, and finally, the lack of the various solutions to these challenges brought by the global concerts.
References
Haass, Richard N., & Kupchan, Charles A. (2021). The New Concert of Powers: How to Prevent Catastrophe and Promote Stability in a Multipolar World.