Teams and Conflict at Riordan Manufacturing Report

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Team Strategy Plan (Strategies for team building)

Assessments tools help individual members discover one unique skill, abilities, and capacity to perform a role. Exercises: An organization may arrange different exercises that will help the team to understand and appreciate the involvement of each member. Coaching uses structured and purposeful dialogue. The main aim of coaching is to make people aware of how well they are performing. Group discussions enable the team members to participate actively in group decision making.

STRATEGYSTRENGTHSWEAKNESSES
Assessment toolsThe tools are capable of improving the skills and abilities of the team members.Assessment tools may not be helpful where there are frequent employee appraisals
ExercisesThey are easy to administer as they do not require much supervision.Exercises can be overwhelming to the individual members.
CoachingThere is a personal involvement between the coach and the members.It may be difficult to get the right and willing coach to perform the task.
Group discussionsThe facilitator monitors all the activities, hence good results.The number can be overwhelming to the facilitator.

Appropriate Strategy

The most appropriate technique is the use of group discussions. This is because many employees are from other divisions. The new employees can also benefit from group discussions because they can raise other important issues. The benefit of this technique is that it gives room for everybody to air his/her own views without discrimination. A facilitator is always present to ensure transparency of the process.

Challenges to team building

Lack of proper communication channels that ensures that there is good communication flow. To address this challenge, the organization has to ensure that there is a clear reporting channel and tools for transmitting the information are clear to the members. Another challenge is the lack of conformity of the organizational objectives to the team objectives. If there is a clash in objectives, then none of the objectives can be achieved. To mitigate this challenge, the organization has to ensure that its objectives have a clear outline and are understandable by the teams.

Evaluation of the team’s success

The success of a team can be evaluated by measuring its level of performance and its ability to achieve the organizational objectives. Another evaluation technique to determine the success of a team is whether the team can perform its roles in peace and harmony. In case of any conflicts or lack of understanding among team members, then the organization should encourage the teams to resolve them at an early stage before they get out of hand. The spirit of togetherness should be present. Another technique is to measure the number of jobs that team members can accomplish as a team and individual members. A successful team is one that accomplishes a complex task better than a person.

Conflict Management Plan (Various conflict management strategies)

Forcing: The objective of this strategy is to force your points to get your way. One does not care about the feelings as long as one achieves his/her goals. Avoiding: The aim of this strategy is to avoid dealing with conflict. The parties believe that conflicts are serious and cause tension. Compromising: This is whereby the parties work towards reaching a quick agreement. This strategy ensures that both parties reach an agreement. Accommodating: This is where one person sacrifices his/her feelings for the benefit of the other one.

STRATEGYSTRENGTHWEAKNESS
ForcingA decision is likely to be made.It ends up hurting the feelings of the other party
AvoidingIt believes that disagreements are bad and often result in tension and problems.One party risks his/her own feelings for the benefit of the other one. It creates long term conflicts and frustrations.
CompromisingThe parties reach an agreement quickly.When conflict is long-term then there lack effective solutions.
AccommodatingIt does not hurt the other person.The other person is capable of taking advantage of the situation Robbins & Judge, (2011).

Appropriate Strategy

The most appropriate strategy is forcing. This is because they are both working in the same department and they cannot accomplish the task without each other. Another reason for using force as a strategy is because James does not agree that he is the one at fault. David has to use force to make James perform his job as expected of him. When one uses force, one does not expect anyone to pass judgment or criticize his/her authority. One does not care about the feelings of the other person. This strategy has the rationale of annoying the other party than ignoring one’s determination.

Alternate strategies

If forcing as a strategy is not successful then the alternative strategy is compromising. This is because David and James are in constant conflict and none of them want to admit they are at fault. This strategy ensures that the two parties find means of coming into an understanding without hurting the feelings of the other person. From the story, David has shared his feeling with the management twice with no solution. Management is the highest body in an organization, and if it does not respond to the complaint, then it is of no use trying harder. Thus, the only solution for David is to compromise with James.

Possible challenges

The potential challenges to resolving conflict are the lack of managerial support. To address this challenge, the management has to acknowledge the different groups with different individuals and thus capable of conflicting with one another. It should put up means of resolving such conflicts. Another challenge is the lack of commitment among the team members to accommodate each other. To solve this problem, the organization has to work towards administering appropriate team-building techniques.

Reference

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational behaviour (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, March 22). Teams and Conflict at Riordan Manufacturing. https://ivypanda.com/essays/teams-and-conflict-at-riordan-manufacturing/

Work Cited

"Teams and Conflict at Riordan Manufacturing." IvyPanda, 22 Mar. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/teams-and-conflict-at-riordan-manufacturing/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Teams and Conflict at Riordan Manufacturing'. 22 March.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Teams and Conflict at Riordan Manufacturing." March 22, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/teams-and-conflict-at-riordan-manufacturing/.

1. IvyPanda. "Teams and Conflict at Riordan Manufacturing." March 22, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/teams-and-conflict-at-riordan-manufacturing/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Teams and Conflict at Riordan Manufacturing." March 22, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/teams-and-conflict-at-riordan-manufacturing/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1