The global financial crisis, which occurred in 2008, was one of the greatest events in the financial and economic history. It is very rare to find a crisis of that magnitude. In fact, it was the worst global financial crisis that the world has ever witnessed apart from the 1930s Great Depression. The global financial crisis is believed to have had numerous causes but the most fundamental is the crisis in the subprime mortgage.
We will write a custom Term Paper on The 2008 global financial crisis specifically for you
301 certified writers online
This could be summarized under “the greed factor”. All business entities acted to serve their own interest since it was anticipated that the housing sector would boom. The crisis was marked by bankruptcy of various leading financial institutions and the collapse of monetary markets like the Wall Street (Taylor 3). In the U.S., the global financial crisis was preceded by loss of trust by the U.S. citizens in the ability of their monetary system.
Soros (2008, p.37) asserts that whereas the U.S. subprime mortgage market is believed to have prompted the current financial crisis, the basis of the crisis derived from the flawed practices and institutions of the current financial system. In reality, the global financial crisis had both the real sector and financial roots causes.
Events leading to the crisis
The Global Financial Crisis of 2008 was preceded by several events. The first event was the credit crisis in the U.S. that triggered off the crisis. The credit crisis had been forthcoming for the last twenty-five years since the world started using dollar as its currency reserve. For many years, the whole world had pegged its currency on the dollar and used it as the medium of exchange. The resultant effect was the creation of periodic economic boom that was frail and likely to fall (Obstfeld and Rogoff 1995, p.78).
Since then, any slump in the dollar would mean a slump in the economy of the whole world. Such a scenario happened in the global financial crisis. Furthermore, the world trusted the notion that the financial market would stabilize the exchange rate and create equilibrium (Soros 2008, p.67). This however leaves the system prone to business manipulation by financial institutions who want to amplify their own gains.
IMF (2008) reported that the credit crunch witnessed in 2008 was set off by the slump in the U.S. Housing sector. From as early as 2005, the housing sector in the U.S. came under severe decline in prices. Buyers who took out huge loans from lending institutions to buy the houses anticipated this decline in prices.
The resultant effect was that traders acquired houses not for settlement, but in anticipation that the market would again rise and operate at a higher profit margin (IMF, 2008). Having anticipated the likely results the U.S. subprime mortgage-industry offered loans to people with poor credit or those without cash for a down payment.
This caused a balance of payment crisis as the lending institutions attempted to support the declining currency, which ensued due to excess borrowing. Such efforts created a deficit in the lending institutions reserves leading to inflation and the final setting in of the credit crunch (Krugman 2007, p.314). The events forced the U.S. subprime lenders to be declared bankrupt.
Across the world, the bankruptcy in the U.S. major subprime institutions reverberates as many monetary and financial institutions peg their currencies on the dollar. The inflation and the consequent decline in dollar value caused other currencies to decline. Due to the bankruptcy of the subprime industry, the U.S. government intervened by cutting the interests rates of its Federal reserve bank to a historical low of 0.25%.
This crippled the Federal Reserve Bank by depleting its reserves to a point that it could no longer support the dollar against the escalating inflation (Krugman 2007, p.316). As a result, lending institutions and traders in the world attempted to sell off their dollar reserves and this set off the credit crisis.
Despite the fall in the subprime section of the U.S. economy, the build-up to the crisis was due to poor government intervention in the way lending institutions conducted their business. It was believed that prior to the crisis free markets were more profitable than the regulated markets.
This culminated in the deregulation of the lending industry in the U.S. with the notion that it posed less risk. Such notions gave banks leeway to innovate and introduce new lending procedures even without seeking approvals from the Federal Reserve Bank (Taylor 5).
Deregulatory policies such as the government sponsored mortgage securitization led to the increase in unsecured low-income home mortgages. Banks and non-banking institutions made mortgages available to the homeowners but with little check on their borrowing qualification.
The cited grounds were that financial institutions were allowed to make loans but then sold the loans to other institutions. In fact, majority of investment banks made mortgage loans, which they packaged into collateralized debt obligations and then sold them to the securitized market with expectations of constant stream of returns from interest-payments.
Get your first paper with 15% OFF
These operations in the financial institutions and system were very much unregulated (Soros 2008, p.38). The loans that were made later turned out to be bad debts to the buying institutions. These institutions could not leverage their capital accounts hence did not payback interests. With huge number of mortgage loans turning into bad debts, the loaning institutions became bankrupt and collapsed leading to the collapse of the mortgage lending banks thus the onset of the financial crisis.
What has happened now?
Financial and Economic consequences
The 2008 global financial crisis led to the revolution in the world financial system and reorganization of global economy. It was found that economic and financial Policies that were pegged on the traditional standards of economic theories such as the aggregate demand and interest rates were inadequate (Minsky 1980, p.519). The consequences of such policies as pegging the currency on other major currencies like the dollar and euro, led to a sharp reduction in the volume of global trade.
In other words, many countries that that fixed their currency on the US dollar or Euro were affected as the value of the dollar declined. The volume of exports went down as dollar continued to depreciate (Peters 2010, p.12). This was attributed to the declining prices as the dollar continued to decline. As a result of the decline in international trade, the growth rates of various economies also declined throughout the world.
Practically, the crisis led to the prolonged collapse of the asset market. The purchase of individual houses increased amongst several persons due to the enormous foreign finances and low rates of interest. Equally, in spite of personal credit records, the banks were eager to loan out money.
The higher demand led to increased prices that in turn led to increased supply of new houses. When the supply surpassed the demand, home constructors reduced their home prices. However, with less people buying such houses the prices further dropped below average. Consequently, the rise in the housing supply drove the prices down. This decline took an average of six years before it stabilized. Moreover, the crisis led to the profound declines in employment rates and total output.
On average, the employment rate declined by over 7% while the GDP per capita fell by over 9% within two years (Calvo, Izquierdo, and Loo-Kung 2009, p.242). In fact, the government revenues were adversely affected as tax revenues significantly declined as economic conditions continued to deteriorate. The government deficits remarkably worsened and the real value of fiscal debt almost reached an exploding point of about 86% (Calvo, Izquierdo, and Loo-Kung 2009, p.245).
Why it takes long to return to normalcy
Conversely, the consequences of the 2008 global financial crisis led to the sharp decline in the exchange value of the US dollar. That is, the value of US dollar plummeted considerably against other currencies (Minsky, 1980, p.520). As the FRB ran out of reserves due to consistent bailouts, it could no longer defend the dollar against the decline in the dollar value. Financial institutions in US and worldwide collapsed as they were declared bankrupt. Severe and risky lending habits had forced the institutions to be declared bankrupt.
The FRB of the U.S. and other Central Banks were forced to pump huge amount of their reserves into the bailout programs. The financial problem thus spread from one sector to the other, starting with the subprime section to the insurance companies, and then to the other debts related financial sections. As one section collapsed, the other sections followed suit. This financial trend was witnessed in other global financial systems throughout the world.
Various policies measures were implemented to curb the crisis. The short-term policies were in form of fiscal rescue plans rather than monetarist in nature.
These included offering various stimulus packages, institutional bailouts besides implementing a combination of strict monetary and fiscal policy measures. It is estimated that the federal government spent around $ 1 trillion in an effort to recover from the financial crisis. These were regarded as the short-term viable policy measures that were to be adopted to rescue the global financial crisis (Peters 2010, p.22).
Long-term policies were aimed at preventing any future crisis. Theses policy frameworks were to deviate from the current policies that are pegged on the standard monetarist approaches and provide new stabilities in the financial market. Albeit aftershocks of the GFC are still experienced, the crisis itself came to an end amid late 2008 and the middle of the fiscal 2009.
Measures to taken to stimulate the economy
In conclusion, policy makers need to learn that the macro-economic policies including those that regulate the financial sector need to be revised. As Minsky (1980, p.520) claimed, the modern economic system, sophisticated financial systems and macroeconomic policies derived from the standard economic theories are continuously becoming irrelevant and a recipe for a big economic slump.
Moreover, governments should realize that globalized trade in commodities has tied many countries together. Therefore, a crisis in one state will automatically affect other countries too.
It should equally be noted that all economic downturns and financial crisis always have their origins in the industrialized countries and not necessarily from emerging economies as have always been perceived. Developed countries including U.S. need to device proper economic and financial policy measures that will not allow such a crisis to reappear.
Finally, each country must be prepared for any economic eventuality by self-insuring against any future crisis. This can be ensured via implementing robust financial and economic policy structures such as holding adequate foreign exchange reserves.
Calvo, Guillermo, Alejandro Izquierdo and Rudy Loo-Kung. “Relative Price Volatility under Sudden Stops: The Relevance of Balance Sheet Effects.” Journal of International Economics, 9.1 (2009): 231–254. Print.
IMF. World Economic Outlook: World Economic and Financial Surveys, Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund, 2008. Print.
Krugman, Paul. “A Model af Balance-of-Payment Crisis.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,11.3 (1979): 311-325. Print.
Minsky, Hyman. “Capitalist Financial Processes and The Instability of Capitalism”, Journal of Economic Issues, 14.2 (1980): 505-521. Print.
Obstfeld, Maurice and Kenneth Rogoff. “The mirage of fixed exchange rates.” Journal of economic perspectives, 9.4 (1995): 73-96. Print.
Peters, May. What the 2008/2009 World Economic Crisis Means for Global Agricultural Trade, Pennsylvania, US: Diane Publishing, 2010. Print.
Soros, George.The New Paradigm for Financial Markets: The Credit Crisis of 2008 and What it Means, New York, NY: Public Affairs Press, 2008. Print.
Taylor, John. “The Financial Crisis and the Policy Responses: An Empirical Analysis of What Went Wrong.” Journal of Economic Review, 89.1 (2008): 3-14. Print.