One underlying issue emanating from this context is past historical relations between the Americans and the Middle East, which is the genesis of events taking shape from the clip. This has been the center of attraction for historical injustices between these bitter rivals. One can assert that ‘economic strength plays a key role to military strength’ as argued by the commentator. Several issues need a thorough review to bring out the exact facts behind the menace taking a new twist from what is believed by the majority of people.
Any nation that comes up with an idea of engaging in war and demonization against another will always have substantive reasons for taking that direction (Tehranian 817). Diplomats argue that most reasons that play a pivotal role in cherishing this, are the desire to retain economic strength. This may be in jeopardy upon suspicion that a nation is not following the international due procedure in taking certain directives that do not sound well with the worrying country (Beeman 51).
The cultural inclination is the pride of every community. This may take a direction that offers the opponent an opportunity to raise some issues causing instability if not critically considered in a mature perspective. Culture is identified with human nature (Crockatt 125).
Protection of economic interest overrides historical virtues and inclination in spearheading for a better place on earth. One major aspect of this perception is that chances of looking at societal virtues as either good or sanity will also depend on past relations and how the relationship has since faired for the benefit of both nations. Forms of variability in the human face have a capacity of making this aspect a bitter one or vice versa. Study in cultural customization involves acceptance of abnormal cultural values. What makes this machine a more tough consideration is the religious inclination, structures that define the culture itself, and other instabilities related to these (Tehranian 820).
It is thus true to say that culture is flexible even though some aspects defining it may be rigid. Moments of anger, grief, and joy can drive people to act differently from their cultural perspectives. America does not tend to evaluate these virtues to guide its next step in diplomatic issues. That is why their opponents will always see them as enemies. There are many anti-Americans in the face of the earth than any other nation in the world; these are mainly the nations from the Arab states in the Middle East.
Several issues of politics and economy play a paramount role in shaping this perception. Whereas the United States and its affiliate act for the good of the entire world, to have a secure economy and stability, opponents view such actions as the political and massive drive to wipe out their people from the earth’s surface. This is not true because every person would want to live in a secure place. The underpinning reasons for these attacks and tortures that remain a major setback of uniting the two major blocks are related mainly to energy resources (Caton and Zacka 203).
The Middle East remains an important supplier of this special commodity to the entire world and any political instability always has a lasting impression on almost every country in the world. The other reason that crops are the desire to manufacture illicit weapons that may have a lasting influence on the earth’s surface (Benedict 1). This virtue makes it hard for international organizations and economically stable nations to oppose such attempts of intruding into the welfare of others. The interest in benefiting the vulnerable overrides the security of those plotting such schemes (Aslan 163).
Past historical injustices still linger to a majority of authors who relate such issues to responsibility and power acquisition. Though this may be true at some length, what remains unanswered is the level and the magnitude of these perceptions when translating to events happening on the ground. The consequences of alternating concepts on the logical bureaucracy are very severe (McKinnon and Silverman 254). Detainment of political prisoners may have elicited a new dimension of these relations. This is attributed to photos that came from detainment places and zones of torture. These have had a lasting impression on the prisoners’ country of origin (Aslan 166).
The hardship that defines such a place makes it bitter for some parties which unable to bury their differences and make the world a comfortable living place. Revenge of these injustices becomes the goal of everyday life (Hirschfield 85). While this alternative approach is not the best, their counterparts have not found the best antidote to that. This makes the relationship between the parties even more severe than the previous status quo.
The consequence of this has been translating into very ugly scenarios. A legal framework that makes it viable, for any nation possessing sound economic strength in a certain economic avenue is not fully operational to enable smooth dialogue in solving problems. This has been taken over by policy formulation. Failure in their implementation is a major setback. However, what comes out clear is the inability of a major organization to take a nonpartisan position in scenes of economic crisis. Accumulation of such issues is what makes it hard for some states to take it lightly when their affairs are interfered with from the western states (Caton and Zacka 205).
Demanding for supremacy in this context has a major part to play. Supremacy and inferiority complex defines this complexion. Human society will never cease it even if the level of civilization attains the optimum threshold value. What makes it take a more defining moment involves several complex ideas in many ways. Education, work, and salary are some of the past discrepancies defining a sour relationship between the western country and their Middle East counterparts.
Equality in these economic segments has never materialized. While people from western countries will always receive an upper hand in all the above mentioned, their counterparts have to endure hardship despite equality in academic grades and training. Some of these differences are what may have shaped harsh responses from the Arabic states because of the fear of discrimination. The matter may even become worse when the latter has a vast control of economic systems that affect major world economies (Benedict 2).
The modern political arena is very hostile and the only major in benefiting from each other. Issues like hate and anti-Americanism had taken the center stage in the Arabic country when the former sought to bring sanity on earth by seeking other measures of engaging in warfare. This is the major reason, while issues of religion play a significant role for the latter. The Islamic religion has a pillar that recognizes the importance of dying at the hand of the enemy who is considered to be nonreligious. They are branded enemies because they fight people and hence the religion. Past conquest also has a very important role in shaping the present perception of these uprisings that make “the world a more dangerous place of living” (Makdisi 540). When a community considers anyone who is not in his or her religion as the enemy, it becomes a very fishy idea and may sound lethal at the end (Makdisi 540).
Just like a crime scene investigation, economic issues need a thorough and critical analysis before taking certain implications that may bring adverse effects on those involved (Kruse 79). Evidence to guide a given direction will never lie. This will help me take a nonpartisan position in law enforcement. Just like jurisdiction, which finds this useful in helping it attain its mandate, the same is also replicable in matters of economy. In this context, winning the war on terror can take a different dimension that may not sound in-humane to many (Beeman 63). The process may take several years to become fully operational and realize the goal.
The only underlying point is to look at all the economic facets defining the genesis of this uprising in a more mature way and make a substantive approach that may not scatter the entire intention. Mutual relations may never come into existence because of historical deeds between these nations. This and other factors are what remains important because it is the only method that drives the economy and maintains peace across the globe (Kruse 81).
Works Cited
Aslan, Reza. How to Win a Cosmic War: God, Globalization, and the End of the War on Terror. New York: Random House, 2009. Print.
Beeman, William. The Great Satan vs. the Mad Mullahs: How the United States and Iran Demonize Each Other. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 2008. Print.
Benedict, Ruth. “A Defence of Ethical Relativism Anthropology and the Abnormal.” Journal of General Psychology 10.1 (1934): 1-6. Print.
Caton, Steven, and Zacka Bernardo. “Abu Ghraib, the security apparatus, and the performativity of power.” American Ethnologist 37.2 (2010): 203–211. Print.
Crockatt, Richard. “No common ground? Islam, anti-Americanism and the United States [1].” European Journal of American Culture 23.2 (2004): 125-142. Print.
Hirschfield, Brad. You Don’t Have to Be Wrong for Me to Be Right: Finding Faith Without Fanaticism. New York: Harmony Books, 2007. Print.
Kruse, Corinna. “Producing Absolute Truth: CSI Science as Wishful Thinking.” American. Anthropologist 112.1 (2010): 79-91. Print.
Makdisi, Ussama. “Anti-Americanism in the Arab World: An Interpretation of a Brief History.” Journal of American History 89.2 (2002): 538-557. Print.
McKinnon, Susan, and Sydel Silverman. Complexities: Beyond nature & nurture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. Print.
Tehranian, John. “Performing Whiteness: Naturalization Litigation and the Construction of Racial Identity in America.” The Yale Law Journal 109.4 (2000): 817-848. Print.