Brief description of the event
Abraham Lincoln is remembered as the 16th President of the United States of America and the first president of the country ever to be murdered. As the history tells us, “he was mortally wounded by John Wilkes Booth, who was a famous actor and Confederate sympathizer, in the Presidential Box of Ford’s Theater in Washington, D.C., while watching the comedy, Our American Cousin” (Burlingame 31). The Assassination of Abraham Lincoln has become an important historical event, which had its severe consequences. The chronicle of the American nation and the United States itself would be entirely different if the President lived.
When the Civil War ended, the American Society was proposed with two rather contrasting strategies for its rebuilding. The murder of the sixteenth president led to the change in the authority of the country, leaving Andrew Johnson for a new candidate for the President. He was a simple Southerner, had a history of slavery in his family, did not receive any development of knowledge and was rather defenseless and exposed by the time of Lincoln’s death. There were no expectations of him to follow and fulfill the ideas of the former president.
The functionalist perspective
According to the functionalist approach, society is poised of codependent elements applied together in order to fulfill the wants and requirements of the given civilization. Moreover, the individuals reside in permanent social roles, aim their attention on the mutual standards and intellectualized social evidences as social outlines exterior to individual persons. The sociologists that follow the functionalist approach would observe the assassination of Abraham Lincoln and its consequences from the point of view of the social minors, such as blacks.
Almost instantly after the Civil War, the Radical Republicans began to establish numerous laws, also called ‘the Black Codes’ that were diminishing the privileges of the black people. For example, in some states it was forbidden for a black man to marry a white woman; otherwise, he would be punished with a death sentence. Moreover, many others laws established by the Congress led to enacting wide-ranging regulations within the time of Reconstruction. The new President has made numerous attempts towards banning all regulations concerning the black people; however, a few critical codes were enacted. The Congress was able to act as its members were willing to, armed with the support of military Southerners. For the same reason, there had been a sufficient quantity of votes to abrogate the prohibitions of the current President, for example, as it happened in the case of the Civil Rights acts in 1866. The consequences of the Lincoln’s death did not end there, but they escalated into more serious issues.
The conflict perspective
The followers of the conflict approach claim that the individual people are subordinated to the social order; moreover, they devoted their efforts to the explanation of the impact that the capitalism had on civilization and culture. They deliberate the economic body of the social order the most significant effect on what different persons think and how they perform. The followers of this theory would describe the consequences of the Lincoln’s assassination in the framework of the radical republicans and their work. Abraham Lincoln managed to regulate their actions; moreover, he had established a strategy for a reconstruction, where the Southern territories were viewed as a lost brother coming back. The Lincoln’s rebuilding was considered to be a potential healing of a country. The Radical Republicans, on the contrary, observed the rebuilding of a nation as an excuse to penalize the South for the civil war (“How Did the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln Affect Reconstruction” par. 2).
Works Cited
Burlingame, Michael. Abraham Lincoln: A Life. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. 2013. Print.
How Did the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln Affect Reconstruction? 2014. Web.