The behavioral styles of the group were identified to be almost equally divided between dominant and interactive styles. Forming a team, such synergy might prove to be beneficial in several ways. Pamela’s behavioral style, just as mine, is interactive, which is related to the domain of the assessment. The focus on people can be seen as the main characteristic of such a behavioral style. If comparing the I-Interactive style to the D-dominant style, which is exhibited by Melissa, Kristen, and Monique, it can be stated that both styles can be characterized by a high decision-making process, with corresponding higher risks. The difference is in the main focus of the person, either the task, for the dominant style, or the people, exhibited by interactive style. Nevertheless, such contrast can be compatible, unlike what it appears to be. Certainly, the most compatible combination are of similar behavioral style, and thus, it can be predicted that the interaction between Melissa, Kristen, and Monique, the interaction might be harmonious, although, their competitiveness might not result in the social compatibility between interactive style exhibited by me and Pamela. Such a bond is deemed as the least productive as well. Thus,
The formation of the team will be based on the common focus and the utilization of the strengths of each other to avoid the weaknesses. Both Dominant and Interactive styles share an outward focus, and similar interests, which can be used as an agreement in the team in the team. The weaknesses, on the other hand, can be seen through that both styles love to delegate. One characteristic increasing the compatibility of the team is the fact that my predominant substyle is appraiser, which is characteristic of competitiveness, and persuasiveness – qualities that can be helpful for teamwork tasks. Thus, if describing the interaction between the team members in one sentence, it can be stated that the members with the dominant style will make sure decisions will be made, while those with interactive style will make sure that such decisions will be made collectively by all team members.
References
Wenschlag, R. (2009). Roger E. Wenschlag’s we hug in the hallways here: discover careers that fit your style. Edina, MN: Beavers Pond Press.