The Issues of Racial Discrimination in US Essay

Introduction

The world of constant controversies about the issues of discrimination is highly emphasized with numerous facts in past and present times when the color of skin characterizes a possible attitude of people. Racial question is still not resolved in society and the United States, particularly. This fact contributes to the field of contradictories between white and black people and between people of other nationalities. That is why it is necessary to figure out the points of biological and social approaches as for the race while pointing out the background and argumentative base when criticizing people for their racial belonging. Three articles by three different writers, Ann DuCille, Alan H. Goodman, and Amy Harmon are taken into account to investigate the problem thoroughly. Moreover, the attitudinal framework of the racial issue props up against the social and historical cut than any convincing facts of peoples’ differences and their possible separation in the society, as a result.

Allan H. Goodman and his evaluation of race issue

While analyzing facts of peoples’ prejudices toward those with another color of skin the article by Allan H. Goodman terrifies with hidden cruelty of the investigator Snow and the case in Oklahoma (Goodman 20). This fact points out that after the years of enslavement which were appropriate to America in previous centuries and abolished on the state and legislative level, one can single out that racial discrimination is inherited and facts of white peoples’ prejudices seem to be taken for granted in the American society. This is emphasized by the author’s words that “race science is bad science” (Goodman 21).

Ann DuCille’s approach

Looking at times after World War II when the United States went through various global changes and was involved in international conflicts having been tremendous for Americans the racial issue drew to a head when everything seemed to be of white origin, toys, clothes, automobiles, etc. Ann Lucille in her article “Toy Theory: Black Barbie and the Deep Play of Difference” makes a reader feel the difference of real intentions among people while talking about or touching upon the race belonging. The author designates the epoch of 1950s and 1960s with personal examples of how the world seen by a black man was perceived in reality: “In the fifties and well into the sixties of my girlhood, the black other, much like the enemy other in our war games, could only be imagined as faceless, far away, and utterly unfamiliar” (DuCille 12). Then there is a question that remains unanswered: Is it so, that people of non-Caucasian appearance and belonging are different in their feelings, minds, perception, and biological structure? With regards to Amy Harmon, the answer is defined as “No”.

Amy Harmon pointing out no biological grounds

This researcher provides a wide scope of statistical and research data outlining the biological approach in racial discussion to be constantly faced in the US. While starting reading the article one can be assured at once with the following data: “The DNA of any two people, they emphasized, is at least 99 percent identical” (Harmon 1). This fact is the main argument for making a stop to discrimination on grounds of race. There is no anatomical or biological framework for stating one race’s priority over another. It is a sort of pro-longed drivel.

Conclusion

To conclude, the facts of different kinds of discrimination in the Us are pointed out due to many things and, first of all, using peoples’ prejudices in their attitudes toward those differing in the race. According to various researches, it is fair and true to claim that there is no mistake in nature and no one within human beings can be judged by others as imperfect. Features of race as well as of gender should look for solutions inside peoples’ minds, for sure.

Works cited

1. DuCille, Ann. Skin trade. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
2. Goodman, Alan H. Bred in Bone? The Sciences, March/April, 1997, pp. 20-25.
3. Harmon, Amy. In DNA Era, New Worries About Prejudice. The New York Times. New York. 2007.