Introduction: The Legislative Process
The first step of the legislative process involves the introduction of a bill to the senate. Members are expected to realize the problems with a view of highlighting pertinent solutions. However, such resolutions should be drafted before any bill is tabled. The bill must be precise and detailed. It should also portray a clear understanding of the likely implementation processes concerning the solution. This essay provides an insight into the legislative process and healthcare lobbying in the United States of America.
Committee Action
After a proper analysis, the bill is presented to the committee of action based on the imminent problem. The passage of the bill to the next stage requires a substantial number of supportive congress members. The public and various stakeholders should be informed on the bill to examine its impacts on the economic, social, and political spheres of life.
The Voting Process
The governing bodies subject the bill to voting once the committee approves it. However, the process can only take place after the ruling it is scheduled by the majority of members of the house. It is accomplished by a minimum of 218 out of 435 representatives. The majority party also influences the senate floor voting. At least 51 out of 100 members have to be present to enable passage or amendment of the bill (American Nurses Association, 2010).
Committee Conference
The committee conference plays a critical role in ensuring that the outcome differences are reconciled. The new bill is then subjected to further voting to ensure that the majority number of members is taken into account. This stage does not require public participation and no further amendments are allowed; hence, the members-only vote for or against the bill (American Nurses Association, 2010).
Signing of the Bill into Law
When the bill passes the above-mentioned stages, the president is given a duration of ten days to sign it into law. However, it should be noted that the bill is also subject to rejection in case it does not meet the requirements of the law (American Nurses Association, 2010).
An issue involving Professional Regulations
The various health policies can be categorized into a number of ways that involve political analyses of the results based on previous experimental researches. One of the major political issues in the healthcare sector is professional regulation. It is concerned with the education of health practitioners with respect to the workplace (Crowly, 2012).
The delivery of quality healthcare has led to controversial debates amongst many health professionals and civilians. Most lobbyists hold that the government is charged with a responsibility to ensure that facility development in various health centers adheres to current health and safety standards (Burkhardt & Nathaniel, 2014). They remain in the forefront to make sure that such governmental roles are guaranteed to the citizens (Crowly, 2012).
Inequality in healthcare delivery is also evident amongst professionals in the different states of America. Most lobbyists suggest that the federal system should be in a better position to handle health policies than the state governments. Most of the healthcare systems can be at the same level as those of the Medicare and Medicaid programs if the federal system offers quality education to providers alongside the development of health infrastructures in the states (Burkhardt & Nathaniel, 2014).
Personal Opinion
On a personal perspective, a combined effort of both the state and federal governments can work well to solve the problems that are associated with professional regulations (Shi & Singh, 2008). However, the state government can be best suited in handling of issues that pertain to the quality of healthcare. Federal-based healthcare systems such as the Medicare and Medicaid use classy facilities and top-notch professionals. This situation makes their services expensive (Shi & Singh, 2008). There is a need to address the issues of professional regulations with respect to the education of healthcare providers and their working conditions among others. As a result, both systems of governance should adopt an inclusive approach.
Conclusion
Lobbyists should remain in the forefront to champion for public health rights. Issues that are related to professional regulations should involve both the state and federal systems of governance to ensure effective implementation of long-lasting solutions.
A Letter to the Local Governor
NAME AND ADDRESS_______________________________
DATE__________________________________________
THE HONORABLE GOVERNOR,
U.S REPRESENTATIVE
WASHINGTON D.C
Dear Representative,
RE: PROMOTION OF BOTH THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS TO ADDRESS PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
I am expressing my opinion concerning the promotion of both the state and federal governments to address professional regulation amongst healthcare providers in the United States.
Numerous citizens and health practitioners have raised concern on the quality of services that are provided by the existing institutions. The quality of service has been dwindling in the past few years. Such effects have emerged from poor working conditions and training standards of the healthcare providers among others. Recent researches have also revealed that many patients are unable to afford expensive services that are offered in the private health sector.
Therefore, I recommend both the federal and state governments to work together to ensure delivery of high quality healthcare services at low costs. I urge you to support my idea of including both systems of governance by drafting a bill that supports the recommendation.
Yours Sincerely,
Signature_________________________
Name____________________________
Reference List
American Nurses Association. (2010). Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice. Silver Spring, MD: Nursebooks.
Burkhardt, M., & Nathaniel, A. (2014). Ethical issues in contemporary nursing. Clifton Park, NJ: Delmar.
Crowly, S. (2012). Health Care Reform and the Supreme Court (Affordable Care Act). The New York Times. Web.
Shi, L., & Singh, D. (2008). Delivering health care in America: A systems approach. Sudbury, Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett.