The Mega Corporation: Clean Water Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Introduction

In the year 1986, Jan Schilichtman filed a civil law suit against a mega corporation, Beatrice Foods Co. and W.R Grace. The Mega Corporation was allegedly accused of negligently as well as illegally dumping chemical waste that was highly toxic in Woburn Massachusetts. The toxin waste that was dumped on the factory’s grounds had allegedly leached into the soil and through the gravitational forces as well as soil erosion made their way into the Woburn Municipal water supply. The toxic wastes in this case were tetrachloroethylene (TCE) and perchloroethylene (PCE) which allegedly resulted to the acquisition of illnesses such as leukemia and many deaths followed. (Rosoff , Pontell,. and R Tillman, 2009)

Facts and evidence

According to Rosoff (2009), between the years, 1968 to the mid 1980’s, there had occurred twenty-eight diagnosis of leukemia cases, whereby out of the possible twenty eight, eight were children who died of the disease.

In 1972, two municipal wells were discovered by a state investigator who discovered that both wells were contaminated by tetrachloroethylene (TCE) and perchloroethylene (PCE). The wells were closed down.( Koscielski, 2001).

In 1976, three possible polluters of Woburn’s drinking water were pin pointed by the EPA. They included UniFirst that was a dry-cleaning operation, Beatrice Foods and Company that owned a tannery, and a machine plant that was owned by W.R Grace.

In the year 1982,Schlichman representing the families of eight deceased children filed a complaint in the civil court. The judge that was presiding in this case was Judge Walker Skinner whose pre-trial decision had the effect of effectively disallowing the testimony given by the victims. The decision also was bias as the judge instructed the jury to answer questions, which they could not effectively comprehend..( Koscielski, 2001).

Discovery phase

The discovery phase lasted for four years, from 1982 to 1986.In 1986; the case was moved to a federal district court. According to Fuchs (1996), despite spending millions, he was unable to prove to the court beyond any reasonable doubt that leukemia was caused by the direct ingestion of TCE and PCE. (Fuchs,1996). In this respect the, jury made a decision which found W.R Grace liable for municipal well’s contamination. On the other hand, Beatrice was found not liable. Having spent millions in the discovery phase and lacking financial resources Schlichtmann was compelled to settle for $8million from W.R Grace an amount, which he had refused from Beatrice. The site that was polluted and contaminated was not cleaned up in the end. (Kennedy,1998)

According to, Fitzgibbons (2000) in 1988, new evidence was uncovered by Schlictmann that the toxic sludge from Beatrice tannery was moved secretly. The case was heard in the court of appeal, which ordered the new hearings to start in 1990.

In 1990 despite the new uncovered evidence, the judge discounted the evidence and relied on the testimony of a chemist hired by Beatrice.

White-collar crimes are committed by persons of high social and economic status in the course of their occupation as it was in the case of W.R Grace. However, the law and the public pressure may be one of the remedies to deal with such and protect the environment. Through mistakes of the past such what happened in the Woburn case, civil action might be used to avert environmental calamities.

References

Fitzgibbons,J.,(2000) A Decade After the Woburn Toxic Waste Case, Chemist Still Ponders Truth, Justice. Web.

Fuchs, E.,(1996) Woburn’s Burden of Proof: Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Health, Web.

Kennedy D. (1998) Behind and beyond the hype over A Civil Action. New York, NY: Knopf. Web.

Koscielski, G., (2001) Environmental Law: Case No. 1:Anne Anderson et. al. v. W.R. Grace et al. Web.

Rosoff S, Pontell,. and Tillman,R,. (2009)Profit Without Honor: White-Collar Crime and the Looting of America. Pearson, Prentice Hall

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, February 1). The Mega Corporation: Clean Water. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-mega-corporation-clean-water/

Work Cited

"The Mega Corporation: Clean Water." IvyPanda, 1 Feb. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/the-mega-corporation-clean-water/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'The Mega Corporation: Clean Water'. 1 February.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "The Mega Corporation: Clean Water." February 1, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-mega-corporation-clean-water/.

1. IvyPanda. "The Mega Corporation: Clean Water." February 1, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-mega-corporation-clean-water/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "The Mega Corporation: Clean Water." February 1, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-mega-corporation-clean-water/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1