Arne L Kallegburg creates a paradigm through which inconsistencies are assessed in the workplace among sections of employees at New York City establishments. The study began to address wage irregularities, but it was discovered that there were also a number of other conditions relating to the mismatched phenomenon pervading the environment. These were vital industrial concerns as they impinge on the organizational theoretical perspectives which needed to be analyzed also.
As such, these conditions were included being vital to both the design and outcome of this research. However, there were deliberate attempts to highlight the mismatched conceptual framework since it was important to be included within the study for recommendations and resolution purposes.
Statement of the Problem
Kallegburg based the mismatched assumption on seven propositional pillars. These include the employees ‘ability to choose where to work; expertise compatibility; what is most important and necessary; how the geographic location affects job site accessibility; implications of the labor market which determine the rating of skills to wages; the remuneration package and how appropriate are academic requirements in relation to the job description applied ( Kellegburg, 2007, p. 431).
These seven discrete variables are used by the researcher integrating within the hypothesis a statement describing a mismatched typology occurrence when they become part of the employee’s job interaction. Importantly, this influences the industrial climate.
Besides, Kellegburg chooses to emphasize his position on the issue by utilizing Angela B Crowell’s work (2007) whereby an introductory reading on the composition of the New York labor force. It was indicative of an industrial catastrophe in terms of organizational orientation. It is believed that the undocumented portion of the labor force greatly complicated the mismatched phenomenon.
Description of the Research Procedure
In describing the procedure for this study it must be noted that the researcher chooses to conduct a book review. He clearly justifies the use of each book utilized. For example interpretations of the Workplace Project were the basis for Kellegburg’s typology of the mismatched worker. (2007)
Emphatically, the researcher alluded to the significance of Gordon’s book since it was instructional; descriptive; uplifting; collaborative, and contemporary. (2007). He reiterates that undocumented immigrant workers are a source of contention presently in American politics. Precisely, there could be no better literature describing the true nature of a mismatched worker as being espoused by Gordon in the Workplace Project.
Literary resources embedded within the study also confirmed that Kellegburg’s design emerged from years of personal study as well as borrowings from other prominent researchers. Primarily, Gordon’s work was extensively referenced in this review. Conclusively, it can be said that this research procedure entails a document study pertaining to selected researches compiled in a book format.
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Review
A major strength of this research is its document source. Its focus is on detecting the intensity of the problem. Subsequently, strategic interventions were recommended as amicable resolutions. The documents perused were most relevant to the research. One piece of literature was derived as a major authority concerning Labor Law and the other offered a sociological perspective of the phenomenon.
Alternatively, even though it was intended that recommendations be made to address pressing issues of the mismatched undocumented immigrant worker, it would appear that this study merely rephrased the situation with no real solutions. Consequently, it is recognizable that typologies of the mismatched worker are most appropriately addressed in the review; yet there is still room for extensive case studies in advancing a realistic resolution.