In the United States, migration is one of the most provocative and serious issues for discussion from multiple perspectives. In “The Morality of Migration,” Benhabib (2019) underlines such aspects as national security, employment, economic health, and national identity to be challenged by promoting new migration policies in the country. President Obama’s statement directive serves as a background for this discussion because it is interesting to understand if all questions, needs, and rights were taken into consideration. The morality of migration is never simple because of the necessity to define human rights on the one hand and the authority of the government on the other hand.
In the chosen source, attention is paid to vital statistical data about the number of migrants in the United States and population changes across the globe. Benhabib (2019) proves the irony of globalization as a challenge to state sovereignty and the intention to live in a world without borders. It is correctly admitted that people cannot take responsibility for places and conditions of their birth, and their desire to live in a better world is their evident right. However, as soon as one person’s right is approved, another person’s right is damaged. The presence or absence of documents could determine people’s freedoms and opportunities. Obama, in his turn, is a responsible politician, according to Benhabib (2019). His administrative policies are based on human rights and most moral aspects to support migrants and change the idea of a better life. Students, migrants’ children, and individuals who want to survive with dignity need to face international laws and obligations. Migration problems can hardly be solved with positive outcomes only, and the offered reading help understand the ambiguity of the issue.
Reference
Benhabib, S. (2019). The morality of migration. In L. Vaughn (Ed.), Doing ethics: Moral reasoning, theory, and contemporary issues (5th ed., pp. 766-767). W. W. Norton & Company.