The book “Into The Wild” written by a famous American writer and journalist Jon Krakauer and first published in 1996 has addressed the theme of the real sense of life including the meaning of success, the value of money, and the concept of happiness based on an itinerant traveler’s, Christopher McCandless, real life example.
The movie “Into The Wild” inspired by Krakauer’s book and directed by the brilliant Sean Penn has also focused on McCandless’ experience but its approach is different. The following paper aims to compare and contrast the book “Into The Wild” with the movie “Into The Wild” pointing out key details that are different to one another. Overall, the evaluation of the two works of art suggests a conclusion that the book is more focused on demonstrating the main character’s inner world along with the implications of his world vision that led him to the death, while the movie is more of a celebration of the main character.
First, juxtaposing the book “Into The Wild” with the movie of the same name¸ the book by Krakauer is a detailed examination of the main hero’s life and death, while the movie directed by Penn is more focused on McCandless’ celebration. Such difference can be explained by the fact that Krakauer shares his own experience and world vision. To the great extent, his hero represents the author’s own life story. As a result, the readers may see the sincerity of his style and engage in the live dialogue fully imbued with the author’s personal ideas, thoughts, and feelings.
Reasoning about his main character living experience, Krakauer associates himself with McCandless because he believes that they share the common vision of the world including the disillusionment of material values and passion for the real values including unity with nature and spiritual growth. In the case of the movie, this unique charm is lost because it is almost impossible to demonstrate other person’s inner world and world vision in such a way that it should be well understood and accepted by the wide public. In this case, the audience may notice Chinese whispers effect.
Next, the book is full of the author’s personal reflections, speculations, and comments about the main character and life in general the audience will not find in the movie. For instance, the book has a large portion where Krakauer provides the explanation regarding his hero that he had no intentions to commit suicide. In this section, the author speaks about his main character’s pursuit to find the meaning of life, the essence of self-actualization, self-fulfillment, and harmony with his inner and outer world.
Some readers might object by stating that McCandless’ comment regarding his planned trip was the following, “If this adventure proves fatal and you don’t ever hear from me again…” (Krakauer 55), and the use of the word “fatal” suggests that he intended to die in the trip. However, these readers might fail to notice the word “if” meaning that the character was simply aware of the fact that the trip could be dangerous for him and might lead to the fatal consequences.
Therefore, a conclusion can be made that the author of the book consistently demonstrates that his main character is a lover of life rather than a suicidal and extravagant person as some of the viewers have believed about him after watching the film. Moreover, Krakauer comments that had the circumstances been more positive for his character, he could be able to return home after his adventurous trip where he aimed to find the real essence of life.
Further, the book and the movie have different perspectives of storytelling. While the book is the documentation of its author’s voice, the film is shown from the perspective of the main character, Christopher McCandless (Into The Wild). Surprisingly to some of the representatives of the audience, Christopher McCandless was a real figure. His true life story served the plot scenario for Krakauer’s work.
Jon Krakauer, as a prominent author interested in the ruminations on the themes of the essence of life, pursuit of happiness, alternative way of living, and alternative world vision to the commonly spread materialistic way of thinking, found Christopher McCandless to be a highly intriguing object for his studies and interpretation because this young man had a sort of mentality that is infrequent for the modern-day western society with its love for money and comfort, and still the man was a real American with the extreme passion for journey to the west and learning some incredible secrets of living in harmony with nature.
Finally, the book “Into The Wild” has addressed the wider scope of chronology than the film. Whereas the film is mainly focused on the adult period in McCandless’s life, Krakauer decided to have a wider focus in an effort to tell his readers every single detail about the character’s outstanding personality, extremely rich inner world, numerous talents along with the dangerous signs of protest against all authorities and desire to shun all the values of the materialistic world.
So, Krakauer’s work makes an overview of different events in McCandless’s life, beginning from his early childhood, to demonstrate how the character’s world vision was shaped and what factors influenced him. In contrast, the film “Into The Wild” focuses on McCandless’s most notorious period in life that is his travelling around the United States and his final journey to Alaska that became fatal for him.
In conclusion, the book “Into The Wild” and the movie “Into The Wild” have both addressed the events of life and death of one of the most controversial itinerant travelers and hikers Christopher McCandless. The main difference between these two works of art is the perspective of the story telling. While the book approaches the subject theme from the point of view of a famous journalist, essayist, and novelist interested in the theme of a pursuit of happiness and essence of life searches, Jon Krakauer, the film directed by the famous director Sean Penn shows the events from the perspective of the main character himself.
The outcome of such two positions is that the representatives of the wide public have accepted the book in a more favorable way because it provides more assistance in pondering into McCandless’ inner world and the hazardous way of thinking that has laid him to the tragedy at the end of his life. In contrast, the movie does not interpret the inner values and thoughts of the main character and does not provide extra understating and suggestions to think over. What it does is just a depiction of what happened without reason on the causes of McCandless’ fatality.
Works Cited
Krakauer, Jon. Into the Wild, New York: Anchor Books, 1997. Print.
Into The Wild. Director Sean Penn. Hollywood, CA: Paramount Vintage. 2007. DVD.