Research design plays a crucial role in conducting research and experiments. The correct choice of this item can directly affect how effective the study will be and whether the researchers will get the desired results. One of the essential advantages of this phenomenon is the provision of acute evidence. However, research design can have negative consequences for academic work, which requires knowledge to avoid them. Thus, this post is aimed at identifying elements in phenomenological that may go wrong and create inaccurate evidence.
One of the problematic elements of phenomenological research design is the fact that when conducting a study, researchers attach more importance to the participants’ opinions about the topic of the work. Therefore, taking into account the point of view of researchers does not have so much value. Because of this, issues may arise since it is impossible to fully ensure the sincerity and truthfulness of the people involved, which may lead to inaccurate evidence (Vagle, 2018). Another element that can cause such outcomes is the lack of a time resources for conducting research. A problem of this kind may arise if the time for studying a particular topic is incorrectly managed or allocated. The consequences of this element may be accelerated research and data collection, which will result in the identification of hasty conclusions.
In conclusion, when conducting research, the right choice of design is essential. This aspect will help to find the most accurate, truthful, and reasonable results that will contribute to the study of a particular topic. The problems that were highlighted in the phenomenological research design were the emphasis on the opinion of the participants of the experiment and the lack of time resources. These elements can significantly affect the falsity of evidence for research and obtaining ineffective outcomes.
Reference
Vagle, M. D. (2018). Crafting phenomenological research. Routledge.