Introduction
The scientific method has important learning and educational significance because it facilitates the exploration of phenomena. It refers to the sequence of events that make up a plan for the achievement of specific research goals that involve the construction and application of knowledge (Haig, 2019). The approach has been applied in a variety of scientific fields, such as physics, to explain the nature of phenomena. The application of the scientific method in the discovery and development of the photoelectric effect triggered a scientific revolution that changed humanity’s understanding of the physical world.
The Scientific Method
There are three key theories that define the elements of the scientific method. The first is the hypothetico-deductive theory, which posits that the identification of a hypothesis is followed by indirect testing for the purposes of the derivation of observable predictions that are amenable to direct empirical testing (Haig, 2019). The postulated hypothesis is confirmed in situations where the gathered information supports the proposed theory.
The second theory that describes the scientific approach is the inductive method. It defines a process that begins with the identification of observable facts that are collected without the proposal of a theory (Haig, 2019). The gathered data forms a foundation upon which researchers propose hypotheses through enumerative induction, which emphasizes the counting of observable cases that are used to draw a conclusion. The final theory is inference to the best explanation, which posits that a significant degree of what is known about the world is premised on explanations of explanatory worth (Haig, 2019). The scientific method involves distinct steps in which a researcher asks a question, conducts research, forms a hypothesis, tests it through experimentation, and uses the results to make a conclusion. It is vital to note that the conclusions can either accept or reject a hypothesis.
Historical and Modern Descriptions of the Natural World
One of the biggest controversies linked to the understanding of the natural world involves the shape of the earth. Pre-millennial literature promoted beliefs that the planet was flat. For instance, Homer emphasized the fact that the Earth was a flat disc supported by a hemispherical sky (Arif et al., 2019). This view was further supported by Greek philosophers such as Mimnermus of Colophon and Stasinus of Cyprus. Pre-Socratic philosophers such as Thales, Democritus, and Leucippus also believed that the planet was flat (Arif et al., 2019). The assertions that the Earth was flat were based on religious views and non-scientific observations that were not based on rigorous assessment and effective data collection.
The modern perspective on the shape of the world is that it is round. The idea was first presented in the 6th Century by Pythagoras and Aristotle, who noted that the round shape seen in a lunar eclipse must indicate that the Earth is spherical (Arif et al., 2019). In addition, the changes in the sizes of ships at sea as they got bigger or smaller depending on their direction of travel were indicative of the planet’s round shape. Scientists such as Posidonus dedicated significant efforts to the determination of the Earth’s shape by applying methods that involved the observation of the movement of celestial bodies (Arif et al., 2019). Their efforts led to the development of astronomy, which necessitated the application of the scientific method. In addition, their efforts influenced contemporary researchers such as Henry De a Beche, who etched the spherical shape of the Earth in his influential book in 1834 (Grevsmühl, 2019). The scientific method has consistently been applied to disprove the notion that the Earth is flat.
The Photoelectric Effect and the Scientific Method
The photoelectric effect is believed to have facilitated the birth of quantum physics. It refers to the phenomenon that facilitates the release of charged particles from materials exposed to sources of radiant energy. It is often viewed as the release of electrons from a metal surface that is exposed to visible light (Rablau et al., 2019). Early studies demonstrated the fact that the effect represented a relationship between light and matter that could not be explained by the existing rules of classical physics. It was commonly believed that light acted as an electromagnetic wave, yet the released electrons’ kinetic energy did not change with the intensity of light (Rablau et al., 2019). The initial observation and systematic study of the phenomenon were conducted by a German physicist called Heinrich Rudolf Hertz between 1886 and 1887 (Rablau et al., 2019). His work was inspired by Maxwell’s theory of electromagnetic radiation, which was published in 1865 and posited that electromagnetic waves moved at the speed of light and facilitated the movement of light as a wave (Rablau et al., 2019). Hertz successfully confirmed Maxwell’s theory in addition to measuring the wavelength and velocity of electromagnetic waves. It is worth noting that Hertz made an incidental discovery that would play a critical role in the particle theory of light that would later be formulated by Albert Einstein. In his experiments, Hertz used a high-voltage induction coil to develop a spark discharge between two pieces of brass and an open copper wire loop to detect the generated waves (Rablau et al., 2019). The experiments inspired Wilhelm Hallwachs to explore the phenomenon further. The photoelectric effect impacts electrons in the atomic and quantum wells (Fornalski, 2019). It should be noted, however, that none of the aforementioned scientists provided a theoretical explanation for their observations.
The photoelectric effect’s theoretical basis would be explored by independent scientists in later years. Joseph John Thompson and Philip von Lenard conducted experiments using cathode rays after which they concluded that electrons, which were negatively charged particles, were the constituent parts of electromagnetic waves (Rablau et al., 2019). It is vital to note that J.J Thomson was awarded the 1906 Nobel Prize for his contributions to the conduction of electricity by gasses (Rablau et al., 2019). The results from the highlighted experiments contributed significantly to the contemporary understanding of the photoelectric effect.
Einstein’s Theory
The basis of Einstein’s theory is the assumption that light rays are made up of packets referred to as quanta. The hypothesis adds to Plank’s assertion that electromagnetic radiation is absorbed in specific multiples of quanta of energy (Hewit, 2019). Einstein posited that radiation fields are quantized, meaning that quantum energy, also referred to as photons, has energy as represented by the equation E = hv (Spagnolo et al., 2019). It is worth noting that h is Plank’s constant, and v is the frequency of the electromagnetic wave. When one assumes that in the photoelectric effect a photon is absorbed by a single electron, then the most energetic electrons have kinetic energy as represented by KEmax = hv – W. W is a material-dependent constant that represents the work needed to free the electron. The most energetic electrons can be slowed down through the application of a retarding voltage, which brings the photocurrent to zero as represented by the eV0 = KEmax (Rablau et al., 2019). Therefore, Einstein’s equation of the photoelectric effect is represented as eV0 = hv – W. In essence, Einstein’s new corpuscular theory of light highlighted the fact that each particle or photon has a fixed amount of energy that is dependent on the light’s frequency.
The photoelectric effect revolutionized humanity’s understanding of light and the world. It played a critical role in the growth of modern physics seeing as it raised significant questions regarding the nature of light. It has been integral in the development of astrophysics and material science. Revolutions in imaging technology, the assessment of nuclear processes, the chemical assessment of materials, and the transition of electrons and atoms between various energy states depend on the principle. The most important contribution that is attributed to the phenomenon is the birth of the quantum revolution, which changed how scientists viewed the structure of atoms and the nature of light.
Conclusion
The application of the scientific method in the discovery and development of the photoelectric effect produced a scientific revolution that altered the world’s understanding of physics. The phenomenon has played a critical role in the conceptualization of light and has had a significant impact on various facets of life, such as imaging, nuclear processes, and the structure of atoms. The scientific method has heralded a transformation of humanity’s understanding of the physical world.
References
Arif, F., Ab Rahman, A. A., Abdul Maulud, K. N., & Kamaludin, A. H. (2019). Debunking flat earth: from a geomatics perspective. International Conference on Space Science and Communication, 150–153. Web.
Fornalski, K. W. (2019). Theoretical estimation of the increase in the photoelectric effect cross section of the X-ray interaction with charged graphene. European Physical Journal Plus, 134(6), 2–7. Web.
Grevsmühl, S. V. (2019). Planet Earth seen from space: A very brief visual history. Contemporanea, 9(1), 37–53. Web.
Haig, B. D. (2019). The importance of scientific method for psychological science. Psychology, Crime and Law, 25(6), 527–541. Web.
Hewit, P. G. (2019). The photoelectric effect. The Science Teacher, 87(3), 12–14. Web.
Rablau, C., Ramabadran, U., Book, B., & Cunningham, R. (2019). The photoelectric effect – project-based undergraduate teaching and learning optics through a modern physics experiment redesign. Fifteenth Conference on Education and Training in Optics and Photonics, 11143, 1–11. Web.
Spagnolo, G. S., Leccese, F., & Leccisi, M. (2019). LED as transmitter and receiver of light: A simple tool to demonstrate photoelectric effect. Crystals, 9(10), 531-548. Web.