Design Process Opinion
In analyzing the design process, the key question is whether a clear description can be given to how we design. The first and spontaneous answer that comes to mind is; it is impossible to give a design description. In my opinion, the design process is exceptionally mysterious, and an extremely personal activity that cannot be easily described. This is because it occurs in a way that is impossible to describe. It is worth pointing out that practice and theory are entirely unrelated things. In order, to assist in describing the design process, several theories have been used.
In the light of this discussion, it is extremely important to make the distinction between a design methodology and theory. A theory is an explanation that gives no prescription, and neither does it possess an architectural point of view. A methodology elaborates the particular operations which assist in the sequence. These include personal thinking, flow charts, and matrixes. It is vital to point out that these processes may or may not be used in the design process. An architectural design theory provides a descriptive narration on how the design process is operated.
The botanical taxonomy designed by Linnaeus in Sweden was regarded as the first principal effort to safeguard systematic order in the natural world. This implies that there was not a consensus yet as far as the design process was concerned. This classification of the system gave light in defining the design process. Consequently, it is still used today. Using a building’s function to elaborate the design process is inadequate since buildings vary depending on the purpose. Moreover, different designs of buildings come up every day.
In my view, it is impossible to have a pattern that is not dependent on other patterns. It is very easy to create a design by bringing together the environment’s atoms. One may question themselves whether there is something like differentiates space. Particularly, the majority of the buildings preferred glazing for opaque walls. Moreover, they avoided daylight or permitted light that was highly controlled to enter through the roof. Khan’s categories had escalated costs and significance as far as the services of various buildings are concerned. This was not only the case experienced in laboratories but other buildings as well. I support the fact that this was because of the ability to come up with bigger expressiveness than was the architecture case.
Architectural Theory Opinion
Failure to come up with an objective definition for the term architectural theory would be unhistorical. Defining such a term requires categorical character and historical legitimation. Studying architectural theory for a long time will prove the subject to be historically indefensible as well as impracticable. The architectural theory is founded on the idea of how a particular building is supposed to appear. The form that a building takes is based on the design theory. How the members have been brought together is based on a structure theory. On the other hand, the procedure for arriving at the design is dependent on the design method theory. This is the case for both simple and sophisticated structures. For vernacular structures, the theory is usually arrived at through rote as opposed to premeditation. It is worth noting that in ambitious buildings, there is a necessity for intentional design choices at every turn. This may be meant for the design, function, or structure. This implies that it is impossible to escape the aspect of applying architectural theory. It is worth emphasizing that the architectural theory is regarded as a property, as well as a concern for all who construct and evaluate buildings. In this case, they might be users or observers.
Vitruvius as well as other theorists support that effectual architects should possess adequate knowledge as far as the practice and theory are concerned. Possessing theory knowledge alone renders one impotent for complete building projects. Therefore, there is a need for practice knowledge, which equips one with craftsman skills. In this case, if practice expertise makes an individual be able to make ideas a reality, then the theory is necessary to offer the conceptual awareness required for devising a design. This awareness should be combined with creative freedom to ensure the achievement of the intended goals. Therefore, there is a need to emphasize that architectural theory is not only prescriptive, it purposes at establishing a wide array of liberty. As opposed to constricting through narrow dictates, architectural theory gives inspiration as well as enabling.
In defining architectural works, there is a need to incorporate the ideological, philosophical, and aesthetic foundations. There are essential in bringing out the historical stands for various works. The attitude to be adopted in architecture’s practical issues is imperative. These include the utilization, materials, and construction, which are equally vital in architectural theory as they form part of the discussion in the theoretical discussion. In defining architectural theory, there is a need to consider various aspects. In this respect, the architectural theory involves the entirety of written architecture systems, be it fractional or all-inclusive, and which is founded on aesthetic categories. This definition is applicable for functional and aesthetic contents. Theorists’ efforts to narrow this definition have proved fruitless. It is also worth noting that this definition raises concerns for a divide between artistic theory and aesthetics on one side, and the other, pure technology. It is also worth pointing out that there is a close association between architectural theory as well as other historical disciplines. Particularly, these include art, architecture, and archaeology. There exists a particular thrilling overlap between social and political utopia. Therefore, societal ideas are expressed as architectural ideas. This is extremely vital in enhancing aesthetic features in a given community. It makes people more creative and aggressive for greater things.
Art history impacts architectural theory by reviving historical theories’ memories. These memories can be utilized by architectural theorists. In these, cases, it is extremely important to define the historian’s role clearly. This is because irrespective of the fact that a historian can have an architectural theory’s history, he cannot advance his theory without going beyond the historian’s role. A historian may reflect on how theorists and architects his work. However, he cannot determine this. Therefore, he has a hand in abusing and using history, which makes objectivity his goal, irrespective of the fact that he may never achieve it.
In essence, it is worth emphasizing that architecture is the business of every individual. For us to appreciate how architects view their work, it is vital to comprehend architecture’s theoretical foundation.