Updated:

Toys “R” Us: Risks and Merits of the Transaction, Industry Dynamics Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Risks and Merits of the Transaction

As for the risks, the toy retail industry is currently in decline. Stowell and Raino (2007) note that industry sales declined 4% last year and analysts’ forecasts for future sales in the US are disappointing. Moreover, toy retail is a competitive industry with such giants as Walmart, Target, GameStop, and Best Buy, which can undermine the position of Toys “R” Us. Furthermore, the nature of the transaction is no less significant risk.

Since it is a club deal, it involves the control of several investment companies. Thus, each investor will have restrictions related to the activities and aspirations of the other partners. Nevertheless, some advantages of this transaction are obvious also. Toys “R” Us has a significant cash flow, which eliminates the possibility of not paying debts when they fall due. The European toy retail market is on the rise, providing ample room for expansion.

Industry Dynamics

In 2005, the toy industry experienced a downturn due to video games and electronics development. Moreover, the policy of competitors, including Walmart and Target, to provide customers with high discounts also puts pressure on Toys. An equally crucial aspect was the ability to recognize and follow trends and demand for products, on which the firm’s success depended. Nevertheless, one segment of the industry experienced a boom. It was a market for goods for toddlers, infants, and preschoolers. There was an increase in the birth rate and an increase in the cost of babies.

Stowell and Raino (2007) state that experts predicted 3-6 % sales growth in this segment. In turn, in Europe, the situation was different. In contrast to the US, which saw a 4% decline in toy demand, European toy sales grew by 3% in 2005 (Stowell & Raino, 2007). Thus, according to analysts’ forecasts, the European pace of sales of toys should have surpassed the American ones.

Questions to Ask Toys “R” Us

  • What are the company’s stable competitive advantages?
  • What is the purpose of the company’s growth strategy?
  • How significant is the company’s position in the industry’s value chain?
  • What are the main macroeconomic factors of business?
  • How many clients and suppliers do you have?
  • What are the company’s key performance indicators?

Each Debt Type in the Transaction

According to Stowell and Raino (2007), prior to the acquisition, Toys had a 35% debt-financed capitalization. In turn, after the acquisition, Toys had $6.7 billion, of which $2.3 billion was existing debt and $4.4 billion was new debt. Thus, the debt of Toys amounted to 83.7% (compared to 35% before the acquisition). The deal made toys much more leveraged.

Sources of debt (in millions):

  • Existing Debt: $2,312.
  • Senior Secured Loan: $700.
  • Unsecured Bridge Loan: $1,900.
  • Mortgages: $800.
  • Secured European Bridge Loan $1,000.
  • Total $6,712.

Potential Exit Strategies

Three potential exit strategies for this investment can be defined. First, since currently, the company is not public, it may take part in an IPO, The second exit strategy is to take over the company with a strategic competitor, such as Walmart or Target. The third exit alternative could be selling the company to another financial investor.

Recommendation to Join the Consortium

I recommend joining the consortium on this deal since there are a number of positive reasons for this. First, because Toys “R” Us has experienced industry difficulties and poor performance, the purchase comes at a huge premium of 122.5% (Stowell & Raino, 2007). Second, the firms participating in this LBO enter into a potentially lucrative club deal. Bain Capital has essential resources to realize and analyze the boom and bust characteristics of the industry. KKR is well established in the private equity industry, and Vornado can assist in valuing and managing Toys’ huge real estate. Thirdly, there is a lot of room for growth in this industry through online sales, sales to children and toddlers, and sales in Europe.

Reference

Stowell, D.P., & Raino, M. (2007). The Toys “R” Us LBO. Kellogg School of Management. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2023, March 18). Toys “R” Us: Risks and Merits of the Transaction, Industry Dynamics. https://ivypanda.com/essays/toys-r-us-risks-and-merits-of-the-transaction-industry-dynamics/

Work Cited

"Toys “R” Us: Risks and Merits of the Transaction, Industry Dynamics." IvyPanda, 18 Mar. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/toys-r-us-risks-and-merits-of-the-transaction-industry-dynamics/.

References

IvyPanda. (2023) 'Toys “R” Us: Risks and Merits of the Transaction, Industry Dynamics'. 18 March.

References

IvyPanda. 2023. "Toys “R” Us: Risks and Merits of the Transaction, Industry Dynamics." March 18, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/toys-r-us-risks-and-merits-of-the-transaction-industry-dynamics/.

1. IvyPanda. "Toys “R” Us: Risks and Merits of the Transaction, Industry Dynamics." March 18, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/toys-r-us-risks-and-merits-of-the-transaction-industry-dynamics/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Toys “R” Us: Risks and Merits of the Transaction, Industry Dynamics." March 18, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/toys-r-us-risks-and-merits-of-the-transaction-industry-dynamics/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1