Unconstitutional Indian Laws Passed by Congress Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Introduction

There have occurred continued misunderstandings on the constitutionality of several Indian laws that were previously passed by the U.S Congress. Differences over their constitutionality led to the involvement of the Supreme Court which was to make decisions on whether they were constitutional or not. Among the areas that differed upon were land grants, casino operations as well as religious rights which were considered unconstitutional due to limitations on their implementation. Duthu (2008 p.45)

Unconstitutional Indian Laws

The law on land grants was passed by Congress allowing the government to issue grants to individual citizens in exchange for their indigenous land. The law resulted from the inability of some Indian tribes to occupy land that belonged to their ancestors. Therefore, congress promised to protect these Indian tribes and also give them some additional funds annually for their upkeep. Financial support was also promised to the priest who would be in charge of the Indian tribes’ religious affairs and even more to fund the construction of their churches.

The total amount of financial support that the U.S government promised to Indian tribes was equivalent to the amount needed to compensate them for land that was originally owned by their ancestors. However, Supreme Court did not agree with the constitutionality of this law that allowed the government to make direct negotiations and payments with individual citizens. It argued that Indian citizens, as well as Indian religious practices, were not allowed to act contrary to American laws. It also argued that agreements regarding money set aside to fund religious undertakings together with land compensation were unconstitutional as they also violated Religion clauses. Wilkins (1997 p.20)

IGRA was an act that was designed to regulate Indian games in casinos and was also among the laws that Supreme Court considered unconstitutional. The Act allowed Indians to play games in their casinos without being taxed. One category of the Act allowed games’ regulation by both the states as well as the tribes where regulatory jurisdiction would be shared within state borders. Games of a particular class three were also permitted and were to be played in states where it was legal.

Regulation of the gaming of class three that comprised of card games as well as slot machines was the area that brought differences on perceptions of its constitutionality and the Supreme Court had to conduct ruling.

After extensive considerations, Supreme Court regarded the inclusion of card games as well as slot machines in the list of those games that should be legally played in casinos as unconstitutional. This was as a result of the violation of previous agreements on the country’s budget where gaming of class three required large amounts of money that were unhealthy for the country’s economic situation. Law only allowed individuals to privately rent properties for these games since the government could not afford to offer them freely in clubs. Magill (2006 p.63)

Reorganization Act for the Indians was yet another area that was considered unconstitutional by Supreme Court. This law was designed to allow Indians to manage their assets, which in this case was land. This would bring forced integration of land practice to an end as self-government by individual tribes would be increased. Written constitutions as a way of strengthening the structure of Indian tribes were encouraged in order to revive the traditions as well as Indian cultures that had been restricted by the government.

However, difficulties that emerged in its implementation led to its presentation before Supreme Court for examination. Supreme Court regarded it unconstitutional arguing that, the department that was supposed to control land owned by Indian tribes would not operate without the control of the federal government. Axon (2005 p.16)

Conclusion

Research shows that some Indian laws did not fully meet U.S constitution requirements which brought conflicting ideas on their implementation. This called for Supreme Court’s intervention to settle conflicts that were related to Indian laws. Supreme Court considered several laws designed for Indian tribes unconstitutional which made them be removed from the constitution. This called for extensive consideration of the areas that brought conflicts in order for them to be revised before being included in the constitution again. Wilkins (1997 p.21)

References

Axon T. (2005): Americas Review, Queensland: Knowledge books & software p. 16.

Duthu B. (2008): American Indians and the law, New York: Viking p. 45.

Magill F. (2006): Great events from history, Loring Avenue: Salem Press p. 63.

Wilkins D. (1997): American sovereignty and the U.S Supreme Court, Texas: University of Texas Press pp. 20-21.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, November 16). Unconstitutional Indian Laws Passed by Congress. https://ivypanda.com/essays/unconstitutional-indian-laws-passed-by-congress/

Work Cited

"Unconstitutional Indian Laws Passed by Congress." IvyPanda, 16 Nov. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/unconstitutional-indian-laws-passed-by-congress/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Unconstitutional Indian Laws Passed by Congress'. 16 November.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Unconstitutional Indian Laws Passed by Congress." November 16, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/unconstitutional-indian-laws-passed-by-congress/.

1. IvyPanda. "Unconstitutional Indian Laws Passed by Congress." November 16, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/unconstitutional-indian-laws-passed-by-congress/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Unconstitutional Indian Laws Passed by Congress." November 16, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/unconstitutional-indian-laws-passed-by-congress/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1