U.S. Laws and Policies on Criminal Investigation Essay

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda

According to the issue of McFadden’s case, it is obvious that it was reasonable for the detective to stop the two men. The two men had portrayed suspicious behavior by walking several times through the store as if they were targeting something (Rios, 2020). The fourth amendment of law gives police a permit to stop suspects at a reasonable point. Frisking of the suspects was necessary, the detective had to do it to know if they carried any potentially dangerous items with them. The fourth amendment policy also approves the conduction of searches under critical circumstances without a warrant. The act mentioned above also allows for frisking suspicious parties upon reasonable suspicion. It would have not made any difference if the men walked by the store every three times. However, in the case of each of them walking by once, a difference could have been made since no one would suspect them. Since the two men walked many times through the store path while staring through the window this could serve as an indicator of a potentially unlawful act. One of the factors that must have led the detective to believe that his suspicion was reasonable is well illustrated at the point where the detective identified himself as a police officer. He asked the two men their names and they responded offensively, which indicated that they could indeed plan an unlawful act. In addition, when the police officer spotted pistols in the men’s pockets it was a sign of unlawful behavior. According to Rios (2020), the first amendment allows police to deal with those whose speech goes beyond control. There is a difference between “stop and frisking” and “search and seizure”. Stop and frisk to a situation where the police undertake a non-welcoming stop on a suspect after realizing that they care about or planning to commit a crime (Rios, 2020). On the other hand, search and seizure is a process whereby police undertake a search after a crime has occurred (Rios et al., 2020). Searches are normally done after authorization is received from judges and is required to be conducted as soon as possible after an arrest.

We will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Essay on U.S. Laws and Policies on Criminal Investigation
808 writers online

Reference

Rios, V. M., Prieto, G., & Ibarra, J. M. (2020). Mano Suave-Mano Dura: Legitimacy policing and Latino stop- and- frisk. American Sociological Review, 85(1) 58-75.

Print
Need an custom research paper on U.S. Laws and Policies on Criminal Investigation written from scratch by a professional specifically for you?
808 writers online
Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, July 8). U.S. Laws and Policies on Criminal Investigation. https://ivypanda.com/essays/us-laws-and-policies-on-criminal-investigation/

Work Cited

"U.S. Laws and Policies on Criminal Investigation." IvyPanda, 8 July 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/us-laws-and-policies-on-criminal-investigation/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'U.S. Laws and Policies on Criminal Investigation'. 8 July.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "U.S. Laws and Policies on Criminal Investigation." July 8, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/us-laws-and-policies-on-criminal-investigation/.

1. IvyPanda. "U.S. Laws and Policies on Criminal Investigation." July 8, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/us-laws-and-policies-on-criminal-investigation/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "U.S. Laws and Policies on Criminal Investigation." July 8, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/us-laws-and-policies-on-criminal-investigation/.

Powered by CiteTotal, free referencing maker
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Request the removal
More related papers
Cite
Print
1 / 1