Introduction
Philosophy is a valuable tool in creating solutions to contemporary issues, including the ethics of abortion. The ethics of abortion is a controversial issue that can only be settled using a philosophical outlook. The utilitarian concept is of the integral theory and has established viable justification for women who choose abortion (Kahn, 2019). The reason is that the theory explains that actions are valid as long as they foster happiness in the general population. This theory indicates that as long as abortion is done to prevent physical, psychological, or social crises, then the action is justified (Kahn, 2019). The theory relates closely with the corresponding truth theory since it focuses on consequences. Therefore, this research paper focuses on the philosophical ethics of abortion, including the utilitarian permissive concept and other intertwining theories.
Definition of the Question and Theories Supporting the Topic
The research question supporting this report is how philosophical concepts can justify actions such as abortion. The research is guided by the permissive concepts of utilitarian theory, which focuses on the general good and satisfaction of the people (Sanders, 2018). Some philosophical theories that align with the utilitarian theory include the Corresponding theory of truth and other government regulations, such as bodily autonomy, considering that they justify the ethics of abortion that in normal circumstances would be shunned.
The Utilitarian’s Permissive Concept for Women’s Right to Choose Abortion is based on the idea that allowing women to make their own decisions will generally result in the most significant overall good. This fact means that women should be allowed to make decisions about their bodies and reproductive health without interference from the government outside forces, or societal pressure (Kahn, 2019). This law requires that women be given access to the resources and information they need to make an informed decision about their pregnancy (Kahn, 2019). This right includes access to accurate information about abortion, as well as access to safe and affordable medical care.
Utilitarians also believe that the mother’s safety and well-being should be considered when deciding between abortion and life. According to Kahn (2019), the decision includes considering the potential physical, emotional, and psychological consequences of an abortion for the mother. For instance, if the woman is young, mentally unprepared, or unprepared to become a mother, they are justified to abort the child. Utilitarians believe that the right to choose abortion should be protected under the law as a matter of justice since a woman should have the right to make decisions concerning her own body and health.
Connection of Utilitarian Theory and the Corresponding Theory of Truth
Utilitarian theory is a consequentialist ethical theory that states that the right action is the one that produces the most favorable balance of benefits over harms. This theory suggests that the utility of action should be the primary consideration when making decisions (Philips-Gary, 2020). Utilitarianism is closely related to the corresponding theory of truth learned in week 6, which is based on the idea that truth is whatever connects to reality. This theory holds that truth should be determined by its usefulness and that any truth that is not beneficial should be discarded. For instance, if the woman is financially unstable to care for the child, abortion is considered a good alternative.
The philosophical basis for a woman’s right to choose abortion has its roots in the concept of bodily autonomy. This concept is based on the idea that every person has the right to decide about their own body, which is fundamental to their autonomy (Sanders, 2018). This freedom indicates that a woman should be allowed to make decisions about her body and health, including the decision to have an abortion.
The concept of bodily autonomy is closely related to a woman’s right to privacy. This right is enshrined in the United States Constitution, and it means that a woman has the right to make decisions about her body and health without interference from the government or other outside forces (Sanders, 2018). This right is fundamental when considering a woman’s right to choose abortion, as it allows her to make decisions confidentially without cohesion. The right to choose abortion is also connected to the theory of reproductive freedom (Sanders, 2018). This right allows a woman to choose whether or not to become pregnant and includes the right to terminate a pregnancy. This right is essential for a woman to control her body and decide her future.
Conclusion
The Utilitarian’s Permissive Concept for Women’s Right to Choose Abortion is based on the belief that women should have the right to choose whether or not to terminate a pregnancy. This concept is rooted in the utilitarian principle of the greatest good for the most significant number. Utilitarians believe that society’s overall well-being should be considered when making any decision. When it comes to abortion, this means allowing women to make their own decisions based on their circumstances. Other philosophical theories, such as the corresponding theory of truth, and bodily autonomy, support the utilitarian concept. Government statutes such as women’s right to privacy and reproductive freedom also significantly reinforce the philosophical justification of abortion.
References
Kahn, L. (2019). Is there an obligation to abort? Act utilitarianism and the ethics of procreation. Essays in Philosophy, 20(1), 24-41. Web.
Philips-Gary, M. (2020). Correspondence theory as a genuine theory of truth. Ephemeris, the Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy, 20(1), 4. Web.
Sanders, R. (2018). Norm spoiling: Undermining the international women’s rights agenda. International Affairs, 94(2), 271-291. Web.