We will write a custom Essay on Values of Government specifically for you
301 certified writers online
Two forms of government
There are two forms of government that can represent the will of the people. In particular, one can speak about direct and representative democracies. Each of these models has both advantages and disadvantages. For instance, one can mention that direct democracy enables citizens to take decisions about political or administrative questions without any intermediaries. Such an approach is beneficial since it ensures that the will of individual citizens is not misinterpreted or distorted.
Yet, the decision-making can be slowed down. This short-coming can become very important at the time when urgent actions or decisions should be taken. In turn, the representative democracy is based on the idea that certain organizations and individuals can express and promotes the interests of the population. This strategy can speed up the development of laws, but there is a risk that the interests and intentions of the public can be disregarded or misrepresented.
United States: Democratic country
There are several cases which can be used to argue that the United States is not a fully democratic country. For example, one can mention that prayers are prohibited in schools, because this ritual is regarded as a violation of the Constitution. In turn, one can note that that the majority of the US citizen can support the idea of allowing prayers in school. Thus, the critics of the American government can say that the will of the nation is not properly represented by the state. Nevertheless, it is important to remember that the role of government is also to protect the rights of the minorities, even if their views are not shared by other people.
Much attention should be paid to such aspects as the freedom of religion or sexuality of a person. Some of these aspects were elaborated in the Constitution of the United States in order to protect the freedom of an individual. Therefore, people should not suppose that a democratic government should only promote the will of the majority. Such an assumption can hardly be called accurate. Moreover, despite some limitations, the United Stated can be regarded as a democracy.
The Jeffersonian-Madisonian debate
The Jeffersonian-Madisonian debate is aimed at examining the role of the Constitution. James Madison argued that this legal document had to include certain provisions that could not be changed by later governments. In other words, the Constitution had to be fixed because in this way, one could ensure that certain rights of citizens such as the right to jury trial. In contrast, Thomas Jefferson argued that the main law of the country had to be flexible since people could have new needs and interests that could not be properly regulated with the help of the fixed Constitution.
These are the main aspects can be identified. These two approaches should be reconciled so that the main law of the nation ensures the unalienable rights of citizens and remains up-to-date. These are the main aspects that can be identified.
The legislative branch of government
The legislative branch of government plays in important role in protecting liberty of citizens. It should be taken into account that legislators define what kind of rights and privileges are essential for a person. Additionally, the laws of the country regulate the activities of executive and judicial branches. This is why the legislative branch is at the core of the political system. Apart from that, there are substantial reasons to suspect a strong executive or judiciary. The problem is that these officials may deliberately misinterpret existing legislature in order to achieve their objectives. This behavior can ultimately undermine the liberties of citizens. Therefore, their actions and decisions should be closely monitored.