What Is Organizational Behavior Anyhow? Report

Introduction

If we analyze then we come to know that organizational behavior noises self-explanatory other than as a meadow of study, this word take in additional than it come into view. No doubt, organizational behavior might be defined as behavior within an association or as a field of learn. In this investigate paper, I will describe “association behavior and knowledge” as a meadow of learn.

The people matters are significant in the achievement or breakdown of an association. Organizational Behavior deals by means of this regulation of organization. There is mounting accord regarding the mechanism or topics that comprise the subject matter area of “Organizational Behavior.” Although present is still substantial debate as to the family member importance of each, there come into view to be universal agreement that OB comprise the core theme of motivation, manager behavior and power, interpersonal message, group arrangement and procedure, learning, approach development and discernment, change procedure, disagreement, work plan, and work pressure (Garcia and Keleman). “Organizational Behavior” may be distinct as a field of learn of behavior inside an organization, which influences the presentation of the association.

Three significant elements of behavior in association are individuals, collections, and structure. It is significant to become aware of that OB includes behavior specially inside an association. Not all the behaviors are part of OB; rather middle is on that behavior which has collision on presentation of the organization. The meaning may be abridges as OB is worried with the become skilled at of what populace do in an association and how that behavior influence the performance of the association. As OB is worried specifically by means of employment-related circumstances, it is not astonishing to find that it highlights behavior as connected to jobs, work, non-attendance, service turnover, efficiency, human presentation, and organization (Organizational Behavior 16-17). Human behavior seems chance. But OB is not simply statistics of chance behavior. A methodical move toward of studying behavior make known that behavior is not chance, and OB can assist in creation additional precise predictions about association behavior. Considering the in sequence in this document, the meaning may be supposed as an in service definition of “Organization Behavior.”

Learning in Action

Learning to run any association productively can be hard, but with no learning the fundamentals of behavior inside any association, it is approximately not likely. Learning to appreciate people’s behavior inside an association would allow some being in a organization place to add to their sympathetic of his or her personnel, their corporation, and creation together labor jointly efficiently. There are a lot of key ideas and terms connected to organizational behavior, and all are a great deal more complex than they appear. They comprise organizational behavior, organizational civilization, variety, announcement, organizational efficiency and competence, and organizational learning.

Organizational behavior is “the study of person behavior in associations. It is a multidisciplinary meadow loyal to understanding person and collection behavior, interpersonal procedures, and organizational dynamics.” (Schermerhorn, Hunt & Osborn, 2005, p. 3) If a being can appreciate organizational behavior and the interconnectedness flanked by the personnel, the corporation, the manufactured goods, and the customer then his or her corporation will be additional winning. However, organizational behavior is a complex mixture of ideas and as such has a lot of parts that need their possess understanding.

One of those ideas is organizational civilization. Organizational civilization “is the communal attitude and principles that power the behavior of organizational associates.” (Schermerhorn, Hunt & Osborn, 2005, p. 9) Organizational civilization is fundamentally the surroundings of the place of work, and it depends on the behaviors, approaches, and system of the corporation and its personnel as a whole. Any association consists of additional than one person and each person places his or her scratch on that ambiance. The surroundings in which any being works consists of a diversity of people attitude and behaviors. Depending on the kind of populace they are it can have an effect on not merely job satisfaction but too presentation. Organizational civilization is the key to a winning employee so extended as it remnants optimistic, helpful, and coincides by means of their person beliefs. The corporation itself contribute to the in general culture of the association but in a more supple way. The company’s objectives, performs, and events all contribute to the civilization of the association. However, if the populace within the association are miserable with them changes can be complete to create the state of affairs additional optimistic.

Another key thought in the sympathetic of organizational behavior is variety. Every one today be acquainted with about diversity and its belongings upon civilization. There are a lot of types of populace who make a payment to the variety of an association be it race, faith, physical disabilities, sex, sexual compass reading, and many others. Many populaces in today’s people still have a difficulty adapting to a varied society. populace have the aptitude to distinguish based on any figure of characteristics, other than populace also have the aptitude to work jointly as a unified whole if they might only conquer their individual dissimilarities. Organizations that worth assortment will have personnel that interact liberally and candidly with no antagonism and it determination help “build an interior climate of richness, one that compliments assortment and offers opportunities for all associates, not just a advantaged a small number of.” (Schermerhorn, Hunt & Osborn, 2005, p. 10).

Organizational behavior is the study and request of information about how populace, persons, and collections act in associations. The reason of such study is to assist interior amalgamation, bring workers from all levels of the corporation closer jointly, and increase their presentation. workers are what make up an association or a corporation. A corporation have to run productively; therefore, the workers have to work well jointly. People work in a dissimilar method and yet are similar in many habits. As a consequence of this feature among workers, an sympathetic of these dissimilarities and resemblances have to be considered once more so we construct improved relations inside our work surroundings. Organizational behavior included a broad variety of topics from slots in person behavior, teams, directors, and leaderships.

Various learns focus on preparation and learning in link with new knowledge’s, chiefly with computers. Attitudinal mechanism in learning concerning success, breakdown, and the procedure of annoying are thematized in a learn by Bagozzi et al (1992). An alike subject is also in use up in a complete research agenda on self-organized learning (Greif 1992), which comprises a sequence of controlled trials to inspect the validity of the future events. The fascinating aspect of this preparation agenda is that it profits from the idea of negligible design (Carroll, 1985) in software to favor rising levels of difficulty in order to house rising reamer know-how. trainee are encouraged to decide learning tasks, help purposes, and difficulty heights themselves. “Exploratory error preparation” as a educational device for identified and manages with inescapable errors is included methodically into the preparation.

Organizational Learning

According to the experts psychoanalysis offers an assorted appraisal of the writing on organizational learning and the individuality of the learning association. There are a lot of reasons for the rehabilitated attention in this field: demographic modified necessitate readjustment of workers policies; communal value changes alter manufacturing family members; the enlargement in universal competition imposes version; rapid technical development needed new competences and behavioral repertoires; following proceedings set new restrictions and occasions for organization; and finally, the lively and integrative possessions of the perception itself create learning an good-looking concept in OB. Since organizational learning and organizational memory incidence are used in their metaphorical intelligence, they are legally accountable to be used in dubious anthropomorphic generalization. though, the writing is replete with examples where, for improved or worse, organization established their capacity to protect information of past knowledge.

A special matter of Organization Science exemplified these summits by bring together a set of significant contributions “in respect of James G. March.” The text review there by Huber (1991) centers on four significant conceptual philosophies connected to organizational learning: information gaining, in order distribution, in order understanding, and organizational reminiscence. Huber asserts: “An body learns if, from side to side its dispensation of in order, the range of potential behaviors is distorted” and goes on to expand a categorization of subconstructs and subprocesses, in exacting those connected to information gaining. The categorization serves as a structure to discuss seriously a wide range of writing. With orientation to the capacious writing on knowledge gaining, Huber notes a lack of increasing employment and mixture. In the work on in order distribution he recognizes a lack of investigate on how associations may make easy the retrieval of and right of entry to obtainable information in the association. On the entire, “work on organizational learning has not lead to research-based strategy for growing the efficiency of organizational learning” (p. 108; for an enlightening exemption, see Van der Schaaf et al 1991).

This previous declaration points to two unsettled fundamental matters lifted inside a inspiring paper by March et al (1991): 1. How do you create valid and dependable inferences from the past (past experience), especially little histories and solitary luggage? and 2. How do you put in order and institutionalize organizational learning? The former subject pretenses an epistemological difficulty, the latter a sensible difficulty of organizational intend and growth. Both blotch the endpoints of the still extensively open and mainly untoiled core region of organizational learning. A fearless theoretical effort to provide a number of answers to these troubles is made by Reinhardt (1993) by put together the social-systems hypothetical places of Maturana (1981). Self-reference and independence are in this background seen as middle criteria for any effort to make easy organizational learning: “Organizations make their own learning ability and copy themselves, if they get into explanation [self-reference and independence] in their message and act” (Reinhardt 1993, p.276).

On an empirical height, the structural impediment to organizational learning and version are investigated in Amburgey et al’s (1993) large-scale past study of additional than 1000 Finnish broadsheet organizations. Based on Hannan & Freeman’s (1984) structural inactivity replica and with archival information from 1771-1963, the writers tested a set of hypotheses concerning organizational alter and humanity in their communication with association past and ecological events. The results point to that an organization past knowledge with alter and its position inside the associations life series are crucial in as long as conditions for achievement or breakdown. Thus, the answer contribute to a improved considerate of intra-organizational learning and ecological collisions.

Analysis and Evaluation

During my expert years, I have approach to recognize three universal main goals of corporations: values, vision, and goals. One might refer to these goals as the reason of a assignment declaration, the reason that drives a company’s workers. This set of principles is what decides the kind of management, message, and group incentive within the commerce. This behavior will inspire the employees, and create the quality of employment that is corresponding to their motivation. This incentive is the key achievement of an individual, collection, or entire association. These consequences are the base from which a commerce or association is administers.

Diversity is an significant factor in present-day organization. Dissimilarity will forever be there populace and in a collection. This is describes conflict. Conflict is visions in today’s civilization as unenthusiastic; though, it can be creative, effective, and expand infrastructure and relations among team or collection associates. This can guide to the enlargement of a corporation by utilized positive ideas and by means of their assortment to their benefit. If disagreement is not administers in a process anywhere it can lead to enlargement, then it will guide to the refuse of an association or a commerce. Organizational

Behavior is the major base to all industries. If managers or cream of the crop cannot appreciate how persons, people and collections act in an association, then the rudiments that build the replica or structure of that corporation or association will decline. life form an effectual corporation means life form cognizant of your location and that include both the workers behavior inside the corporation and the stage the organization operate on.

Robbins clarified organizational civilization, as “Organizational civilization is a communal sympathetic by all associates of an association that differentiates that association from others.” There are seven individuality of organizational culture. These seven individuality explain an association’s culture and give details how things are complete in the association and how workers are to perform. It is not whether the workers agree with an association’s civilization but how they distinguish it. The seven individuality of organizational civilization are as go after: novelty and risk captivating of employees. Are workers motivated to be innovated and get peril in their jobs? The height of detail that is predictable of workers. Management of the association on procedures and techniques quite than the result of a situation spend ending compass reading, which is how a great deal notice. People orientation look at the belongings their choice have on the populace in the association. Teams quite than persons organize team compass reading, what amount of the labor in the association. Organization violent and competitiveness.

Reflection on Learning corporation constancy and the authority to maintain the position quo in difference to enlargement of the association.

At VPI (Veterinary Pet Insurance) the civilization is physically powerful. In the information that workers were authorize and trusted to do their jobs, it was a corporation brought up on the thought we are all doing a huge beneficial repair for pet proprietors and veterinarians, and everybody who worked there was arrogant of that. The corporation knowledgeable speedy enlargement; everybody pitched in and was a group. The

Organization was listening carefully on approaches to create the corporation improved. Top organization seemed dedicated to the goals and business policy but then things begin to fall apart. Expenses were not restricted, everyone was riding far above the ground on the detail that the corporation had greater than before sales almost 36% in one year; expenditure was absent of manage and a number of bad decisions were complete costing the corporation prospect sales. This week our Ceo as it was give details to me was for an indefinite period detached from his place perhaps for misappropriation. Half our senior organization has also fairly in the last month With so a great deal faith and the corporate civilization that instilled that faith no single increasingly question where the cash was going. Looking once more at the seven individuality for organizational civilization; this corporation succeeded in each characteristic. But there were two evils; one was the difficulty of one person who was not ethical and forbidden a large piece of the corporation. The second was how the corporation handled outcome compass interpretation. I do not consider a lot of consideration was put into the result of some events and policy that the business had and this set them back monetarily. This company is still in service, but our civilization has been reduce to the speculated of rumors and the thought of loosing our occupations.

Discussion

This learning examined the belongings of organizational gaining knowledge on attainment presentation, using behavioral learning theory to appreciate this association. This theory, in difference to learning-curve theory, proposes that experience may not of necessity give way optimistic consequences. Rather, behavioral learning hypothesis allowable us to expand a unforeseen event replica that posits varying belongings for organizations’ attainment knowledge. Depending on the natural world of precursor conditions (e.g., the resemblance between firms’ acquisitions), the effects of applying past gaining knowledge may vary from optimistic to unenthusiastic. Hence, behavioral learning theory helped us explain and forecast the belongings of association acquisition knowledge across a wider variety of circumstances than would learning-curve hypothesis.

In line with behavioral learning theory, we establish evidence for both optimistic and unenthusiastic effects of acquisition knowledge. First, in the bulk of cases, at what time a firm’s present gaining was dissimilar to its previous acquisitions, gaining experience had a unenthusiastic power on acquisition presentation (for slightly and reasonably knowledgeable acquirers). When knowledge across all acquirers was scrutinize, the consequence of gaining knowledge was U-shaped. The best players appeared to be moreover those lacking knowledge that, consequently, did not make an unsuitable sweeping statement error or persons who had a important quantity of knowledge and appropriately distinguish. Second, in the alternative of cases, when a firm’s present acquisition was alike to its prior gaining, attainment knowledge had a optimistic influence on attainment presentation. The results propose that those firms that create manifold attainment within the same manufacturing benefit by simplify past attainment information. Hence, even although it is possible to apply past knowledge unsuitably, poor outcomes strength be avoided if firms be relevant experience to alike acquisitions. These consequences show that behavioral learning hypothesis may add worth to the attainment knowledge literature since, unlike learning-curve hypothesis, it explains and forecasts together optimistic and unenthusiastic authority of association acquisition knowledge.

The consequences of this learning are also pertinent to organizational knowledge more generally. The request of organization knowledge is an constituent of association life that is all-encompassing. Firms may apply knowledge from one place to another, from one manufactured goods to one more, or from one marketplace to another. even though there has been a extraordinary quantity of empirical psychoanalysis on association knowledge, very small of it explored these belongings outside developed settings. Sympathetic organizational knowledge may be superior across association locations by applying a behavioral learning viewpoint when the collision of precursor conditions and behavioral answer are unspoken. Future investigate be supposed to decide if the ideas obtainable here can be comprehensive beyond attainment in other organizational contexts. It might also travel around past history to organizational knowledge, such as firm age, that were not measured here but that may authority organizational knowledge. Finally, while only important organization knowledge was tracked here (i.e., acquisition better than $10 million), the crash of lesser forms of organizational knowledge (e.g., achievements less than $10 million) should also be measured in future employment that scrutinizes the belongings of the other categories of knowledge.

Adaptive Learning

In general, it is unspecified that adaptive learning comes the length of with a inferior amount of organizational modify. This income that adaptive learning is seen as a procedure of incremental change. What is additional, adaptive learning is too seen as more routine and less cognitively persuades than practical learning. The inferiorities of adaptive learning contrast to practical learning are also spoken by the dissimilar labels, which have been second-hand to explain these two types of learning. Single-Loop against Double-Loop Learning, Lower height versus Higher height Learning, Tactical against Strategic Learning, and Adaptive against Generative Learning, in progress the conversation about organizational learning. In these views mostly an adaptive procedure in which goals, attention rules or which parts of the surroundings the association should pay attention to, and look for rules that stir the association in a exacting way to find problem-solutions are modified to the knowledge that are complete inside the association. The focus of the difficulty is solving excellence of the concentration- and look for rules so still in stable surroundings, associations can learn how to regulate their events in order to better achieve.

Findings

Organizational choices depend on certain rules. The knowledge’s, which have been complete inside the association, determine the inside of these rules. If the system no longer fit the knowledge they have to be distorted. This procedure of rule modify can be exaggerated by different turbulence, false interpretation of proceedings or the obstruction of the understanding of individual insights. These fondnesses of the procedure of learning make known that OL can merely be regarded as a incomplete balanced procedure.

Effectiveness is an organizational lively that haunts executives. The thought of effectiveness is concealed within the cover of more popularized philosophy. Popular hypothesis of Total Quality Managing (TQM), Constant Quality Improvement (CQI), and organizational competence are seen as ways to efficiency. Variables frequently cited as necessities for organizational efficiency comprise:

Quality workers with fervor for their work and a height of approval that leads to short income, communication approach with reliable and bracing mail

Environment Process

Clear performs, policies, and decisions. A surroundings tolerant of modify and novelty for new product growth. Interdepartmental message

Effective management of person resources greater than before information distribution, extensive preparation, financial and non-financial plunder, appraisal and widespread criticism

Strategic Choice

Strategic alternatives about which advertises to pursue and which occasions to pay no attention to but with suppleness to pursue carrying out tests, An ability to look forward to competitor responses to planned responses as well as expect employee reply, A strategy connected to organizational goals and appraisal. All organizational levels contributes in communicating core letters and communication graceful from top to underneath and underneath to top, high-quality external message – from new let go, fact sheets, yearly reports, management and management Opportunities for worker progression and enlargement.

Information within Organization

Information inside an organization determine their aptitude to make knowledgeable choices and the effectiveness of those choices is based on the way they converse. This mechanistic viewpoint on infrastructure deals completely with the communication, the average and factors that aid or detract from the procedure. In my line of work, I dress towards the customer based on whether ‘set of clothes and tie’ or ‘informal’ are the option for the customer’s association. This non-verbal cue can aid in get ready the initial mental base for the residue of the chat and ensure that it does not detract from the discussion while it is continuing. Most seriously, though, the intellectual office structure must clearly get better the excellence of the place of work for the person, on behalf of a major philosophical alter in the office plan. After all, what are the by electronic means improved office intended to make easy, if not the efficiency, efficiency, and well-being of the employee, and the final effectiveness of the association. Customary organizational plan ideas are being challenge with the ideas of tele-commuting and practical corporations and offices. Technology has facilitates us to plug into the place of work put wherever in the world utilized advanced telecommunications and computer go forwards. Many offices now have supple office areas for their personnel where they can sit downward, stop in a processor and have a phone, desk, and universal place of work

Requirements Available

When they are at their other place of work locations, they just plug in to that exacting place. All of this is see-through to the sender or handset of in order from that person.

An instance is an advertising organization where a pal of mine mechanism for in Toronto, which has other places of work in New York and Chicago. When he travels to these offices, he has all of the assets obtainable to him. This is see-through to his clients, who immediately believe he does a magnificent job from his residence office in Toronto. The types of communications are alike, with more stress bottoms on digital transmissions (email and voicemail). I utilize influence mail efficiently when on a customer site by having a position for clients to call in for me and I can vet and prioritize my calls. Over all, these rudiments all create up a strong organization that will be talented to adapt its workers to modify as well as its commerce performs.

Behavioral Learning Theory and Organizational Acquisitions

Substantial evidence survivors that penalty do affect behavior at the solid stage. If firm presentation is classified as a firm-level result – such that physically powerful performance is a shape of firm-level “recompense” and poor firm presentation is an organizational “sentence” – then high-quality firm presentation probable leads to behavioral perseverance, while deprived firm presentation should guide to behavioral decrease, a forerunner to behavioral modify. Researchers have establish effects that would corroborate this. Reliable with satisfied behavior leading to behavioral perseverance, good presentation has been exposed to guide to organizational inactivity (e.g., Miller and Chen, 1994). Reliable with punished behavior most important to behavioral modify, poor firm presentation has been found to be linked to many forms of association change, counting chief executive official change, planned modify, and divestitures. Thus, as at the person level, evidence lives that firm penalty do authority organizational behavior.

Though antecedents have been cautiously studied at the person level, the firm-level belongings of past history on behavior have up till now to be methodically travels around. We look at them in this study by centers on a exact type of behavior: the request of knowledge (generalization) or non-application of knowledge (discrimination) in organizational behavior. Consistent by means of individual-level investigate, when precursor circumstances are comparable to previous state of affairs, firms should simplify, but when precursor circumstances are different to previous situation, firms should distinguish. Building on this thought, we build a model of organizational knowledge and its consequences beneath dissimilar circumstances.

A Model of Organizational Experience

Researchers have condenses behavior into its antecedent-behavior-consequence (A-B-C) mechanism to better appreciate behavior at the person level. Dependable with this technique of behavior psychoanalysis, and to improve understand the precise effects of knowledge for firms, we urbanized a two-by-two medium that breaks downward these same three mechanism.

Research from the psychology writing has shown that the additional comparable events are to every other, the more probable it is that the sweeping statement of past occasion knowledge will lead to optimistic outcomes. Research from the psychology writing has also exposed that persons improve on a variety of physical tasks with task recurrence. Parallel consequences have been established in the organizational writing on knowledge and learning curves. For instance, organizational studies have listening carefully on the chronological developed of a exacting organizational manufactured goods, such as aircraft borders. In this background, the precursor condition is the resemblance between developed conditions. As a firm produce airplane frames, the developed conditions linked with the production of the 99th airplane border are similar to persons associated by means of the 100th aircraft border. Since the precursor circumstances are similar, developed experience tends to be widespread on or after one developed condition to one more. Thus, positive association penalty follow from the sweeping statement of experience from alike antecedent circumstances. It is this quadrant that financial records for the customary experience or learning-curve consequences ordinary in the writing.

Conclusion

That guides to the next key idea of organizational behavior, organizational efficiency and competence. “Organizational efficiency is sustainable far above the earth presentation in accomplish assignment and objectives.” (Schermerhorn, Hunt & Osborn, 2005, p. 10) When charge effectiveness it is also significant to believe organizational competence in the operation of capital and the approval of all parties concerned and the long-term continued survival of the commerce in a altering world. (Schermerhorn, Hunt & Osborn, 2005, p. 10) Efficiency maximize income and reduce waste, but the efficiency of the association methods and put into practice are necessary to uphold a positive association between the workers, the product, and the purchaser.

One other key idea to association behavior is organizational learning. “Organizational learning is the course of acquiring information and using in order to adapt productively to altering circumstances.” (Schermerhorn, Hunt & Osborn, 2005, p. 15) An association have to be flexible in its move in the direction of and roll by means of the blow as it exist. If an association cannot adapt to altering demand and societal force it will not have lasting achievement. They may require to take a danger and business enterprise into new and up-and-coming marketplaces, or simply refine their method to add to the effectiveness and competence of their present market and personnel. A corporation can never stop learning plus it can never stop altering. If it does, it will turn out to be sluggish and be unsuccessful in time.

Learning to direct any association successfully can be tricky, but with no learning the basics of behavior inside any organization, it is approximately not possible. Learning to appreciate organizational behavior would allow any corporation to increase employee approval from positive performs. Working to improved interactions flanked by employees from varied background will increase message. Increased communication will cut downward on squander and augment both efficiency and efficiency. Any corporation is capable of creation the modified necessary to advantage their association in this way, but only from side to side learning from its mistakes and become accustomed to a changing world. The learning of organizational behavior and its sub-concepts is the key to a optimistic and winning future for all association and perhaps civilization as a complete.

References

1. E. Garcia and K. S. Keleman. “What Is Organizational Behavior Anyhow?” 16th Annual Organizational Behavior Teaching Conference. Columbia, MO. 2022.
2. Robbins, Stephen. P. Organizational Behavior. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing, 2001.
3. Levinthal, D.A. & March, J.G. (2001): A Model for Adaptive Organizational Search. In March, J.G. (ed.): Decisions and Organizations. Oxford, New York: Blackwell, 187-218.
4. Ajzen, I. (2003): Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. In L. Berkowitz (ed.): Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 1-64). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5. Cyert, R.M. & March, J.G. (2001): A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
6. Besson, T. (2004). A Company’s Culture is as Important as the Job. Web.
7. Musante, L. (2001). Better Living Through Culture. Web.
8. Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N. (2005). Organizational Behavior. Ninth edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
9. Adler PS. 1991 Workers and flexible manufacturing systems: three installations compared. J. Organ. Behav. 12:447-60
10. Adler PS, Borys B. 2003. Materialism and idealism in organizational research. Organ. Stud. 14(5):657-79
11. Amburgey TL, Kelly D, Barnett WP. 2004. Resetting the clock: the dynamics of organizational change and failure. Adm. Sci Q. 38:51-73
12. Apostolakis G, ed. 1991. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management. Amsterdam: Elsevier
13. Astley WG, Zammuto RF. 2005. Organization science, managers and language games. Organ Sci. 3(4):443-60
14. Austin JT, Villanova P. 2004. The criterion problem: 1917-1992. J. Appl. Psychol. 77(6):836-74
15. Bagozzi RP, Davis FD, Warshaw PR. 2003. Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Hum. Relat. 45(7):659-86
16. Bass BM. 2002. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press
17. Bass BM. 2003. Bass’ & Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership. New York: Free Press
18. Bass BM. 2004. Is there universality in the full range model of leadership. Int. J. Public Adm. In press
19. Bass BM. 2001. Stress and leadership. In Decision-Making and Leadership, ed. F Heller pp. 133 55. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
20. Bass BM, Avolio BJ. 2005. Transformational leadership: a response to critiques. In Leadership Theory and Research: Perspectives and Directions, ed. MM Chemers, RA Ayman, pp. 49-80. London: Academic.
21. Adelson, Beth 2003 “When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of a task may increase with expertise.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10: 483-495.
22. Andersson, Dag, Nicola De Sanctis, Beniamino Finzi, Jacopo Franzan, Sumantra Ghoshal, and Philippe Haspeslagh 2003 “Electrolux: The acquisition and integration of Zanussi.” INSEAD Business School Case, 390-037-1, Fontainebleau, France: INSEAD.
23. Asquith, Paul 2001 “Merger bids, uncertainty, and stockholder returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11: 51-83.
24. Asquith, Paul, Robert F. Bruner, and David W. Mullins 2004 “The gains to bidding firms from merger.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11:121-139.
25. Beatty, Carol A. 2003 “Wanted: The perfect tiny acquisition.” Business Quarterly, 58 (4): 51-59.
26. Boeker, Warren 2002 “Strategic change: The effects of founding and history.” Academy of Management Journal, 32:489-515.
27. Bourgeois, L. J. 2001 “On the measurement of organizational slack.” Academy of Management Review, 6: 29-39.
28. Bower, Gordon H., and Ernest R. Hilgard 1981 Theories of Learning. Englewood Cliffs, N J: Prentice-Hall.
29. Brickley, James A., Jeffrey L. Coles, and Rory L. Terry 2001 “Outside directors and adoption of poison pills.” Journal of Financial Economics, 35: 371-390.
30. Brown, Stephen J., and Jerold B. Warner 2002 “Measuring security price performance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 8: 205-258.
31. Browne, Lynne E., and Eric Rosengren 2004 “Are hostile takeovers different?” In Lynne E. Browne and Eric S. Rosengren (eds.), The Merger Boom: 199-229. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank.
32. Bruton, Garry D., Benjamin M. Oviatt, and Margaret A. White 2003 “Performance of acquisitions of distressed firms.” Academy of Management Journal, 37: 972-989.
33. Campbell, Cynthia J., and Charles E. Wasley 2002 “Measuring performance using NASDAQ returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33: 73-92.
34. Chatterjee, Sayan, and Michael Lubatkin 2001 “Corporate mergers, stockholder diversification, and changes in systematic risk.” Strategic Management Journal, 11: 255-268.
35. Chi, Michelene T., Paul J. Feltovich, and Robert Glaser 2004 “Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices.” Cognitive Science, 5: 121-152.
36. Cyert, Richard M., and James G. 2001 A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, N J: Prentice-Hall.
37. Datta, Deepak K., V. K. Narayanan, and George E. Pinches 2004 “Factors influencing wealth creation from mergers and acquisitions: A meta-analysis.” Strategic Management Journal, 13: 67-84.
38. Davis, James H., F. David Schoorman, and Lex Donaldson 2003 “Toward a stewardship theory of management.” Academy of Management Review, 22: 20-47.