The article discusses aircraft automation and its connection to human errors in aviation. The importance of the research done by the authors lies in the fact that aircraft automation is one of the main causes of large accidents. In order to broaden the reader’s knowledge, the paper provides an analysis of 94 cases from Flight Deck Automation Issues. In addition, it strives to review the literature on the subject and provide a clear understanding of the reason behind the unfortunate occurrences. Ultimately, this work claims that pilot training lacks the steps necessary to ensure adequate use of automation in aviation.
The hypothesis proposes a need for an advanced qualification procedure or training that would employ alternative methods. This statement is supported by literature and other research findings that affirm the need for training in coping with automation. The authors used the Human Factor Analysis Classification System model to further prove this claim. The methods employed include case analysis and statistical research, structuralizing accidents by their causes. The resulting findings show that rule-based error occurred more often than other errors and was caused mostly by excessive reliance on automation.
The article is highly thorough in its approach to research literature in support of their claims. It has an easy-to-read style, and it properly shows the magnitude of the accidents connected to automation. If a criticism could be lodged against it, it would be that it does not provide sufficient coverage of international cases. It would be advantageous to provide more than four examples of international accidents in the future.
Reference
Kwak, Y. P., Choi, Y. C., & Choi, J. (2017). A study on the human errors on the aircraft automation system. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Information Security 1(2), pp. 1–6.