Around-The-Table Negotiations in Diplomacy Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Face-to-face meetings are an essential type of diplomatic negotiation with their specifics, which are studied using the theory of international relations, structural realism, and communicative action. Often the determinants are the emotions, personal qualities, and interests of the negotiators, which can distort the initially set agenda and motives of the parties to varying degrees (Wong, 2020). However, at the same time, these negotiations are necessary, as they are the most high-quality and accessible way of conveying the correct position of the state since the percentage of distortion when using impersonal channels is much higher than the errors in the emotions of the negotiators (Wong, 2020). In addition, half of the success in this stage of the negotiations is the formula, which should be as concise and specific as possible, eliminating ambiguity.

The priorities in around-the-table negotiations lie in the plane of the parties’ interests, determined in advance, at the previous stages by the formula. Unfortunately, even with a formula that meets all the requirements, reaching at least some kind of agreement is far from always possible. The parties are pre-configured exclusively for complete submission to their interests or have principled positions on which compromise is impossible (Berridge, 1989; Hussein & Malley, 2002). As a result, ideally, the priorities should be not only their interests but also reaching an agreement, ending the conflict, and other events that require the participation of two parties to complete the case.

Personal relationships at this stage, involving face-to-face contact, promote trust. Trust, in turn, reflects the guarantor of performance, which sets the stage for further negotiations and reaching an agreement (French, 2019). Diplomats scale the interests of states, translating them into human language and using emotions and gestures for practical actions that involve compromises. At the “round table” stage, this aspect has the most significant field for deployment.

References

Berridge, G. R. (1989). International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944), 65(3), 463-479. Web.

French, R. W. (2019). The Round Table, 108(2), 121-144. Web.

Hussein. A. & Malley R. (2002). Foreign Affairs, 81(3), 10-18. Web.

Wong, S. S. (2020). International Studies Review, 22(1), 77-97. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2023, October 20). Around-The-Table Negotiations in Diplomacy. https://ivypanda.com/essays/around-the-table-negotiations-in-diplomacy/

Work Cited

"Around-The-Table Negotiations in Diplomacy." IvyPanda, 20 Oct. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/around-the-table-negotiations-in-diplomacy/.

References

IvyPanda. (2023) 'Around-The-Table Negotiations in Diplomacy'. 20 October.

References

IvyPanda. 2023. "Around-The-Table Negotiations in Diplomacy." October 20, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/around-the-table-negotiations-in-diplomacy/.

1. IvyPanda. "Around-The-Table Negotiations in Diplomacy." October 20, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/around-the-table-negotiations-in-diplomacy/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Around-The-Table Negotiations in Diplomacy." October 20, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/around-the-table-negotiations-in-diplomacy/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1