The word branding often refers to the vast corpus of studies on how businesses leverage their brands to obtain a competitive advantage in the marketplace. This involves everything from building brand equity to establishing new brand extensions to managing foreign trademarks (Cantor, 2020). The emergence of modern technology has changed the brand tactics of celebrities, online users, and businesses. Several social media sites have emerged during the previous decade to enable information transmission, interpersonal connection, and individual marketing. In the contemporary era, it is believed that for a company or individual to succeed in branding, one needs to get acquainted with the technology to attract an audience. This essay will discuss how an organization or individual can get branded by technological advancements and competition in our current societies. The essay, therefore, intends to discuss branding strategies in the new branded world and whether technological advancements have become a branding challenge.
According to Andrews and Shimp (2017), economic upheavals brought on by the ongoing technological revolution, growing levels of unpredictability in global markets, and crises of complexity brought on by the proliferation of social media combine to make the present era a tough one for businesses that are looking to establish or improve their brand identities. According to Cantor (2020), the new branded world cuts through technological advances of brand development through social media platforms such as Instagram, Linkedin and Facebook.
In the new era of branding, several factors are considered for a brand to outstand during this competitive edge. First is the inside-out approach, which refers to relying on consumer feedback to establish a brand’s identity (Fitzpatrick, 2017). However, focusing only on consumer input is analogous to treating symptoms instead of the underlying disease. Customers may be able to identify specific issues they want to see fixed, but they often lack adequate knowledge to comprehend the company in depth. On the other hand, an inside-out strategy achieves a unique and credible branding campaign by using ideas that arise from inside the business itself, a process primarily dependent on leadership backing. Then, validation research is undertaken, bringing workers and external audiences to gauge their reactions to fundamental concepts and ensuring that the resultant strategy will be apparent, persuasive, and relevant. For example, at Siegelvision, by drawing on ideas and information that already exist inside the company, an inside-out strategy may help create a credible and unique brand.
Consequently, creativity is another strategy that can be used to outstand the stiff competition. In the new era, the success of a brand is directly tied to an organization’s creativity. More precisely, effective marketing efforts for brands incorporate their messages into narratives that move, excite, or entertain the people they are trying to reach. Often, customers anticipate that their preferred brands would, in addition to providing product advantages, also generate value. Even while a captivating tale may be enough to capture the audience’s attention, brand executives must put in a further effort to gain their loyalty. Those that match the requirements are more effective than campaigns that only concentrate on the advantages that can be rationally justified. Consequently, it suggests a broad trend toward responsibility among brand customers. Consumers now want businesses to consider how their decisions affect their employees, the neighborhood, and the environment. It turns out that consumers give justice, authenticity, transparency, and ethical production and consumption a lot of consideration.
Thirdly, in the new branded world, finding a purpose is essential, but it is insufficient for companies to flourish. Brand executives know the importance of upholding a commitment across all engagements since they are consumer advocates. The brand might be at risk if the promise is breached. The potential and the challenge that a purpose-driven brand strategy brings are too large for any department to manage effectively. To build a consistent story and succeed in a purpose-driven change, all functions and senior team members must work closely together. Flikkema et al. (2019) claim that pursuing a similar goal often serves as a unifying force. Intense talks over a team’s mission always form a more robust unit. The purpose must be transformed into a set of values and objectives that influence communications, operations, and the growth of people and products.
To bring a brand’s activities and purpose to life in the modern day, brand planners and agencies must work more constructively and nimbly together. There has been a trend among industry leaders away from fixed client-agency contracts and toward more fluid ecosystems that encourage brand entrepreneurship. This shift necessitates the development of new marketing strategies.
According to Gürhan-Canli et al. (2018), brands are crucial to marketing any particular product primarily because a brand plays a significant role in establishing your organization’s reputation and image. In most instances, customers do not purchase things based on an organization’s management and financial position; their choice to purchase a product is entirely based on how it is presented and its capacity to fulfil a specific need. Therefore, offering a product a friendly name or an appropriate symbol is sufficient to convince buyers that it is what they need. Facebook, for instance, has a large number of users globally. It provides a competitive edge for companies and organizations to brand themselves through content creation and replying to their customer’s messages.
Consequently, brands are essential to a company’s success and often relate to what an organization does to gain public recognition. According to Flikkema et al. (2019), branding may include placing an advertisement, affixing your company’s emblem to your automobile, and utilizing a beautiful letterhead on your invoices and correspondence that provide crucial information about your firm.
It is worth noting that branding represents how people judge the value of a product or service that a company provides. Regarding this claim, Müller (2018) defines the concept of branding as the decision a company makes to establish a name, symbol, or design that consumers associate with the company. According to Gürhan-Canli et al. (2018), firms often use branding strategies to promote product recognition, sales, and customer loyalty, a concept that most organizations or individuals use.
Not only are customers significant to the success of branding, but so are organizations and even individuals. The value of branding in the modern period is that it enables firms and customers to create mutually beneficial expectations. According to Eugenio-Vela et al. (2020), their study was based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, which provides knowledge of people’s reasoning and goals and explains why individuals do the things they do. As the main theoretical framework for the analysis. Consequently, branding has played a part in various organizations and has become successful by using Maslow’s theory of the hierarchy of human needs as a compass for our investigation.
However, in the new branded world, efforts to strengthen the brand often come with specific hurdles, and a firm has to be prepared to meet these obstacles to succeed (Tan et al., 2018). Despite these benefits, taking the lead is not without obstacles, so awareness of this reality is critical. The first obstacle that has to be conquered is the cost that comes along with doing this endeavor. As a consequence of engaging in this endeavor, further research will have to be carried out in each selected market. This is a venture that will not be conducted at a low cost. There will also be opposing interests over whether the brand should be handled centrally in a standardized manner or if the administration of the brand should be delocalized.
It is also evident that the new branded world, in which social media plays an essential role, is seen as trustworthy and appealing by a significant number of individuals all over the globe. According to Molyneux (2019), real self-branding is the presentation of an individual’s actual self in advertising and other public contexts. It also applies to how artists and internet users advertise themselves (Stoyanov, 2017). Considering the rising number of young women who use Instagram regularly reveals that the vast majority of people who use social media platforms only share content that elicits the desired emotional response from their followers. An analysis of the sources and data gathered from such platforms will not give any meaningful details on the audience experiences that are being targeted (Gustafsson & Olsen, 2018). Followers of various artists and celebrities should carefully evaluate the non-authentic self-branding that has become a ubiquitous difficulty in recent years. This is necessary to prevent possible difficulties that may emerge in the future.
In conclusion, branding comprises many moving parts, each of which must be strong in its own right but much more so when they join together to form a powerful whole. It is challenging to construct a brand appropriate for the twenty-first century, where technology is the driving force and competition with several brands. However, social media platforms have enabled consumers and workers of organizations previously resistant to criticism to express their views. To compete effectively, one has to spare time and plan since branding requires time.
References
Andrews, J. C., & Shimp, T. A. (2017). Advertising, promotion, and other aspects of integrated marketing communications (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Cantor, A. M. (2020). A brief history of branding. 99designs. Web.
Eugenio-Vela, J. D. S., Ginesta, X., & Kavaratzis, M. (2019). The critical role of stakeholder engagement in a place branding strategy: a case study of the Empordà brand.European Planning Studies, 28(7), 1393–1412. Web.
Fitzpatrick, H. (2017). Marketing management for non-marketing managers: Improving returns on marketing investments. John Wiley & Sons.
Flikkema, M., Castaldi, C., de Man, A. P., & Seip, M. (2019). Trademarks’ relatedness to product and service innovation: A branding strategy approach.Research Policy, 48(6), 1340–1353. Web.
Gürhan-Canli, Z., Sarial-Abi, G., & Hayran, C. (2018). Consumers and Brands across the Globe: Research Synthesis and New Directions.Journal of International Marketing, 26(1), 96–117. Web.
Gustafsson, A., & Lervik-Olsen, L. (2018). Chapter 15: The Past, Present and Future of Service Marketing: From Understanding Quality to Understanding Customers. In At the Forefront, Looking Ahead: Research-Based Answers to Contemporary Uncertainties of Management (pp. 251-266). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Molyneux, L. (2019). A Personalized Self-image: Gender and Branding Practices Among Journalists.Social Media + Society, 5(3), 205630511987295. Web.
Müller, M. (2017). ‘Brandspeak’: Metaphors and the rhetorical construction of internal branding.Organization, 25(1), 42–68. Web.
Stoyanov, S. (2017). A theory of human motivation. CRC Press.
Tan, T. M., Salo, J., Juntunen, J., & Kumar, A. (2019). The role of temporal focus and self-congruence on consumer preference and willingness to pay. European Journal of Marketing, 53(1), 37–62. Web.