To begin, it should be emphasized that the chosen article is peer-reviewed and dedicated to quite an important topic. This implies a number of specific features of the publications of such a kind – they are evidence-based, reasonable, and demonstrate a coherent train of thought. Moreover, there are ten authors who contributed to the mentioned article, which, in turn, serves as a great foundation for the significant background of the issue discussed. The publication focuses on a particular and narrow topic – community vision of the influence of climate change on health in Nunavut, Canada. It has all the necessary formal attributes inherent to peer-reviewed articles – abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, conclusion, acknowledgments, and the reference list.
Generally, the authors use an inductive way of reasoning and ground the provision of the crucial arguments on it. The approach is as follows; first, the scholars provide a fact or a number of indisputable facts on which they further base their claims, suggestions, and conclusions. Such a method allows the reader to follow the content easily. What is more, given the consistency of the rationale, induction provides the opportunity to stress critical aspects meaningfully and visibly. For instance, the introduction is founded on the following principle – after the authors give a convincing number of facts supported by appropriate in-text citations, they justify the relevance of the research, appealing to these facts in the “Community-led Research” section (Healey et al. 90).
Then, the authors tend to use strict and formal language while delivering their findings and ideas, which, again, is due to the scholarly character of the article. They use direct word order, avoid informal expressions, and do not tend to utilize literary words that may shift the focus from the issue risen. It should be admitted that the scholars follow the best practices of academic writing and do their best to convey the message clearly.
At this point, it seems reasonable to raise the issue of rhetorical appeals used in the article. First, it seems apparent that the publication is founded mostly on the appeal to logos. The scholarly articles usually aim to provide concise and concrete ideas by supporting them with essential and proper pieces of evidence and relevance. The use of inductive reasoning, exemplification, and coherent thoughts in the publication indicates the appropriacy of the latter claim. However, the inclusion of visual elements – photos that were viewed by the participants – shows the appeal to pathos and ethos as well. For example, Figure 2 is a picture in which a specific consequence of climate change for ordinary people is presented. This may cause the feeling of grief in the reader. Then, Figure 6 shows how “children are “stuck” with what we leave them” (Healey et al. 94). It appeals to the shared value of the necessity to care about the environment so that future generations could live well within the context given. Thus, the article seems to have a good balance of rhetorical appeals.
Works Cited
Healey, Gwen. et al. “Community Perspectives on the Impact of Climate Change on Health in Nunavut, Canada.” Arctic, vol. 64, no. 1, 2011, pp. 89–97.