Home > Free Essays > Environment > Climate Change > Los Angeles Regional Collaborative for Climate Action and Sustainability
Cite this

Los Angeles Regional Collaborative for Climate Action and Sustainability Case Study


Executive Summary

The subject of the study is the LARC organization (Los Angeles Regional Collaborative for Climate Action and Sustainability). The purpose of this community is to reduce the consequence of climate change and protect the environment from pollution. The structure of the organization includes the governing body, the managing director, and other members. The University of California sponsors the activities of the collaborative.

The work of LARC consists of periodic meetings with the population, as well as the development of special programs and plans. The organization has managed to achieve certain results: the government began to pay more attention to the level of environmental pollution and monitor the number of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. As additional sources of information, scientific and peer-reviewed articles were used, as well as images and information from the official website of LARC.

Introduction

An attempt to reduce the negative impact of technogenic and other factors on the state of the environment is quite an urgent issue for many developed countries and regions today. The proliferation of industrial enterprises on a large scale has caused many organizations and companies to join forces to deal with the effects of pollution. Such associations are rather significant as joint efforts made by the participants in these projects contribute to a faster and more efficient solution to the problem in a particular area.

Therefore, it is not surprising that the Los Angeles Regional Collaborative for Climate Action and Sustainability (LARC) was established on the west coast of the United States. LARC aims to eliminate the consequences of human-made pollution and stabilize the climate situation. Attempts to adapt the environment to modern conditions are the key activities of this group, which operates in one of the most developed regions of the USA. The following image reflects all the sectors represented by seats on LARC’s governing board.

Collaborative History and Purpose

LARC has been active for ten years and is still successfully working today. The primary goals of the collaborative are attempts to strengthen partnerships, share relevant information, and develop a set of measures to promote nature protection and eliminate the effects of hazardous contaminants (Hughes & Pincetl, 2014). The problem that LARC addressed for the first time can be called quite actual today. Global climate changes caused not only by natural factors but also by people’s activities are a serious issue relating to each human.

What concerns the political motivations of the organization, LARC sought to rally local authorities and other officials and stakeholders to participate in the issue (Bennett & Grannis, 2017). The participants of the collaborative convened those wishing to take part in their activities. They developed specific programs that described possible measures to solve the problem of environmental pollution, as well as the primary points that deserved attention.

For example, they tried to inform the population about the issues associated with the climate through advertising campaigns. In particular, it was the question of carbon pollution and ways to reduce it, as well as the need for preparatory measures aimed at adapting to changing climatic conditions. Several leaders of the organization were engaged in the development and dissemination of the ideas of the collaborative. These people called on all interested parties to share information and “develop system-wide strategies” (Bennett & Grannis, 2017, p. 3). The following image reflects the timeline for the formation of LARC.

Collaborative Structure and Process

The geographical scope of the organization covers the west coast of the United States. This region is well-developed for infrastructure and large industrial complexes. The members of the collaborative meet every other month. As Ansell and Gash (2008) note, agencies and stakeholders must communicate regularly for the working process to be successful. Both interested parties and the Governing Board attend these public and private meetings. All news and time of scheduled meetings are displayed on the organization’s website. At least four members of the governing board must be present to have a quorum.

Organizational Structure of LARC

The organization is managed by a distinct body created for this purpose. The governing board consists of respected representatives of LARC, who have to participate in all meetings and discussions. This part of the organization includes no more than seven members. In addition to all the considerations and performing work (the adoption of programs, work with personnel, etc.), the governing board adopts resolutions, establishes the mode and order of meetings, identifies key topics for discussion, monitors the funds of the association, and regulates the participation of the members of the collaborative in particular projects. The image reflects the LARC governance structure.

Any member of the organization can become a potential representative of the governing board. Every year, this body organizes the admission of new members and encourages interested persons to apply for participation in the collaborative. Sometimes, there may be a turnover of men and women in LARC since the tasks of the Governing Board include an annual check on the performance of all employees who can either stay inside the program or be excluded.

There are no important members who cannot take part in the activities of the collaborative. The organization gives everyone an opportunity to join the LARC team if a person proves his or her effectiveness and willingness to work for the benefit of this structure. As a rule, all participants are tightly involved in the work of the community; otherwise, it hardly makes sense to admit new people.

Another significant representative of LARC is the managing director. As Bennett and Grannis (2017) remark, for the first time, this position was presented in 2010. The central task of this person is reporting to the governing board, as well as responsibility for decisions made in the team and ways to achieve them. The Managing Director is the official representative of the collaborative at all hearings and meetings. Nevertheless, the major decisions are made collectively, and everyone can express his or her position and make a constructive proposal to the work of the body. The LARC charter recognizes the need for the organization to cooperate with government agencies. Based on this document, joint work is seen as a key way of sharing knowledge and information in the face of a constantly changing climate.

Funds of the Collaborative

According to Bennett and Grannis (2017), the primary sponsor of the organization is the University of California. It is this educational institution that is the platform for the development of all LARC’s ideas. Its scholars collaborate with the representatives of the organization throughout all stages, beginning with the proposal of a particular idea and ending with its implementation. Thus, any of the grants that the collaborative receives has a separate budget. All the studies conducted in the territory of the University of California are financed from federal funds. However, in case the participants of the organization develop a project outside the educational establishment, a determined tax will be deducted.

Outputs and Outcomes

According to Pincetl, Graham, Murphy, and Sivaraman (2016), the involvement of government agencies in environmental protection programs is essential since decisions taken at this level are of considerable strength. The collaborative, during its active work, has put forward some proposals and recommendations. They were previously approved by the governing board and discussed by LARC members. Besides, the basic ideas have always been associated with the protection of the environment. Therefore, the collaborative did not face any contradictions. The target audience, as it is evident, has always approved such recommendations and contributed to their development and implementation.

The idea to reflect the key directions of LARC’s work relates to the introduction of a particular framework. It regulates the relationship between the target sectors and the climate protection policy. This proposal was implemented not only at a local but also at a federal level. The scheme included various industries like transport and energy spheres, as well as key areas that require close attention. It is about water and forest resources and the ways of processing and recycling wastes. This project would not have been developed without the participation of the collaborative, and it is one of the organization’s numerous achievements.

As Hughes and Pincetl (2014) claim, teamwork has always been considered one of the successful ways to implement projects that are unlikely to be realized without the participation of several members. LARC has always sought to ensure that the ideas and proposals of the organization receive the maximum distribution and could be used to improve the environmental situation (Hughes and Pincetl, 2014). As a rule, all members of this body are competent employees who usually do not allow for any gaps in their knowledge. That is why all decisions are taken unanimously, and each participant of a project understands his or her importance and the ability to influence the opinion of the group.

Collaborative Cooperation as the Way to Improve Working Relationships

As it is known, the merits of the collaborative include not only the achievement of goals but also the team building, as well as the manifestation of the atmosphere of support. Trust and teamwork are essential attributes of success (Hughes & Pincetl, 2014). Working relationships in LARC have always been built in such a way that each member of the team was aware of the importance of his or her participation and could contribute to the development of the common idea.

Also, this approach to work is a rather good way of accumulating and distributing capital. If a project is developed in the union of several people, it has more chances to get recognition from the government and become a basis for achieving a positive result. Moreover, a respectful attitude in the team positively influences the cultural level of employees. It allows proving the seriousness of the intentions of the organization’s participants and at the same time contributes to more productive work.

From a political point of view, collaborative work also has a sufficient number of advantages. First, the decisions made by the team and approved by the official governing body are greater than those of one person. Secondly, the criteria for selecting participants in the LARC are created in such a way that only professionals work in the organization. Consequently, qualified specialists are well versed in various aspects of society, including politics, which gives more chances to get approval from the authorities. Therefore, the work of the collaborative has a positive impact on policy issues.

Analysis of the LARC’s Work

LARC is a rather vivid example of the organization, which combines all the features necessary for fruitful and productive work. In some ways, the activity of the collaborative is similar to the examples described in the scientific literature. For instance, Ansell and Gash (2008) discuss the specifics of cooperation in the same region, focusing on water resources and their conservation. They describe similar examples of the development and implementation of useful ideas, and also emphasize the benefits of teamwork in solving significant social and natural problems.

However, some unique features distinguish LARC from most other organizations. In particular, it is a policy of cooperation with the University of California, as well as the work under the patronage of government agencies. The following infographic reflects LARC’s main sectors of work.

Figure 4. Infographic of the relationship between the target sectors and the climate protection policy (http://www.georgetownclimate.org/files/report/GCC-Lessons-in-Regional-Resilience-LARC-Jan_2017.pdf).

LARC’s Achievements

Among the goals of the employees of the organization, it is worth noting the reduction of the level of pollution and greenhouse gases, as well as the creation of conditions that allow adapting to climate change. The most evident progress that the LARC staff has been able to achieve includes measures taken by the government about environmental protection. Informing the population about the possible consequences of pollution of nature and using the framework developed by the organization help to tell as many people as possible about the importance of this problem and the need for urgent intervention.

Perhaps, the success of the activities of the collaborative programs is due to the professionalism of its members, as well as the competently chosen course of work. If it were not for an efficient system of management and personnel selection, many achievements probably would not have happened.

In the course of work, certainly, there were some difficulties. For example, according to Bennett and Grannis (2017), local authorities are not always competent in matters relating to the environment. Perhaps, it somewhat hampered the work of the organization and prevented specialists from explaining the importance of their activities. However, it did not become a reason for abandoning the set goals. The implemented programs had no significant shortcomings and were distinguished by the clarity of the assigned tasks.

Conclusion

Thus, the work of LARC to prevent the dangerous consequences of climate change is not only advantageous but also necessary. The development of all industry sectors inevitably leads to technogenic cataclysms caused by people’s activities and negatively affects the ecological situation of a particular region. The work of the organization and its specialists aims at improving the state of the environment and developing new programs that may help improve the environmental situation. The collaborative’s activities play a significant role in protecting the environment. People learn more about existing issues, and it will possibly help correct the current situation with the pollution of nature.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571.

Bennett, A., & Grannis, J. (2017). . Web.

Hughes, S., & Pincetl, S. (2014). Evaluating collaborative institutions in context: The case of regional water management in Southern California. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 32(1), 20-38.

Infographic of the relationship between the target sectors and the climate protection policy. (2017). Web.

LARC governance structure. (2017). Web.

Pincetl, S., Graham, R., Murphy, S., & Sivaraman, D. (2016). Analysis of high-resolution utility data for understanding energy use in urban systems: The case of Los Angeles, California. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(1), 166-178.

Sectors represented by seats on LARC’s governing board, with the six specific member organizations identified based on the makeup of the Board as of August 2016. (2017). Web.

Timeline for formation of LARC and several key initiatives of the collaborative. (2017). Web.

This case study on Los Angeles Regional Collaborative for Climate Action and Sustainability was written and submitted by your fellow student. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly.
Removal Request
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda.
Request the removal

Need a custom Case Study sample written from scratch by
professional specifically for you?

Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar

301 certified writers online

GET WRITING HELP
Cite This paper

Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2020, November 11). Los Angeles Regional Collaborative for Climate Action and Sustainability. Retrieved from https://ivypanda.com/essays/los-angeles-regional-collaborative-for-climate-action-and-sustainability/

Work Cited

"Los Angeles Regional Collaborative for Climate Action and Sustainability." IvyPanda, 11 Nov. 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/los-angeles-regional-collaborative-for-climate-action-and-sustainability/.

1. IvyPanda. "Los Angeles Regional Collaborative for Climate Action and Sustainability." November 11, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/los-angeles-regional-collaborative-for-climate-action-and-sustainability/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Los Angeles Regional Collaborative for Climate Action and Sustainability." November 11, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/los-angeles-regional-collaborative-for-climate-action-and-sustainability/.

References

IvyPanda. 2020. "Los Angeles Regional Collaborative for Climate Action and Sustainability." November 11, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/los-angeles-regional-collaborative-for-climate-action-and-sustainability/.

References

IvyPanda. (2020) 'Los Angeles Regional Collaborative for Climate Action and Sustainability'. 11 November.

More related papers