Homelessness is a chronic problem that impacts millions of individuals around the world. Due to a lack of reasonably priced housing and growing rental expenses, a significant number of individuals are without a place of their own. Several administrations are contemplating transforming hotels into makeshift accommodations as a possible reaction. This essay will demonstrate that transitioning a restaurant into an interim refuge is a viable and advantageous solution to homelessness. Firstly, the state should distribute funds to rehabilitate or build new facilities to supply the homeless with a secure and appealing place to live. Secondly, emergency shelters provide more than simply a place to sleep; they also offer resources and programs to help people overcome the underlying issues that led to their homelessness. Finally, offering a safe and regulated living space and changing a hotel into a momentary accommodation can also help address safety problems in the surrounding neighborhood. This essay will demonstrate that alteration of motels into emergency housing is a cost-efficient and successful strategy for addressing homelessness by analyzing the three arguments.
The Government should Spend Money to Renovate or Create More Shelters
The homeless crisis is a serious one that impacts people on an individual level as well as institutions on a global one. People wander the streets for various reasons, including a shortage of reasonably priced housing and access to essential services (Culhane and Seongho 830). However, these are the two primary justifications for why individuals find themselves homeless. In light of this, jurisdictions are in a position to play a significant role in the solution to this issue by constructing emergency shelters that are reliable and secure for people who are in need. In this section of the paper, the argument will be made that the authority should invest money in redeveloping or establishing more shelters by transitioning hotels into makeshift houses to offer safe and protected surrounding for the homeless.
A viable and economical approach to combating the problem of destitution is to transform hotels into emergency shelters. Hotels already have the required services and amenities, such as beds, toilets, and kitchens, to provide emergency accommodation for guests, so they are an ideal choice. In addition, hotels frequently sit in central locations that are well-served by various means of transportation, making them an excellent choice for the provision of emergency refuge. The authorities can save money on building expenditures and help people who require transitional housing by transforming restaurants into dormitories (Culhane and Seongho 830). Those in need of temporary accommodation include those who have been displaced from their homes.
Moreover, temporarily transforming hotels into homeless shelters can offer a setting that is protected from danger and conducive to feeling safe and comfortable. Particularly when wandering the streets, those homeless frequently risk being victims of violent acts, robbery, and other types of misconduct (Baxter et al. 380). Homeless people can take advantage of the safety precautions, such as video surveillance and on-site security agents, when provided with temporary lodging in a hospitality context. Homeless people may experience a greater sense of protection and security as a result of this, which can assist in lowering the likelihood of being subjected to violent behavior and other types of abuse.
Thirdly, repurposing hotels into emergency shelters for the homeless is another way to ensure these persons have access to the necessary services and resources. Homeless people have access to various services offered by many hotels, including cleaning equipment, web access, and extracurricular opportunities, which can enhance their overall quality of life (Baxter et al. 380). In addition, by forming partnerships with local groups and service companies, transitional shelters can offer hospital services, psychological health assistance, vocational training, and other options that can assist persons in transitioning from homelessness to permanent residence.
Lastly, in light of homelessness being a human rights infringement, the state should allocate funds toward constructing additional emergency shelters or renovating existing ones. Having no home is a breach of the globally renowned right to appropriate housing, which can be found in universal laws on human rights (Smith 265). The government must guarantee that all individuals have access to healthy and cheap accommodation, and providing emergency housing can assist the authorities in meeting this task. Due to this, being homeless may be humiliating and demoralizing because homeless people frequently have little choice but to sleep in public places and rely on others for their most fundamental requirements. Those facing homelessness can feel honor and worth restored in part through providing temporary shelters (Kim et al. 4). From the survey results, respondents believed the government should spend money renovating or creating more shelters.
Therefore, homelessness often worsens societal issues, such as deprivation, unemployment, and addiction. The state can make a framework for providing social assistance such as psychotherapy, career guidance, and rehabilitation programs available if it allows emergency housing for those in need. Making investments in makeshift shelters can help resolve the urgent requirements of people who are homeless and defend the human rights of those individuals (Baxter et al. 380). It is an essential move toward forming a culture that places a premium on and acknowledges every community member’s inherent dignity. The government should invest money in either refurbishing existing shelters or building new shelters by transforming hotels into temporary shelters to create a safe and secure setting for people without homes. This strategy is feasible and cost-efficient, and it can give homeless people access to vital resources and services. The federal government can make a positive impact on the lives of individuals as well as communities all around the country by implementing measures to combat the issue of homelessness.
The Temporary Shelters will Bring Social Development
The problem of homelessness is a multifaceted issue that may have its roots in various conditions, including deprivation, unemployment, problems with mental health, addiction, and a lack of available accommodation. Providing emergency housing for homeless people is a crucial step toward finding a solution to this problem. Converting an existing building, such as a hotel, into a makeshift refuge is one potential solution to this issue. This section describes how transitioning a hotel into a temporary shelter can bring about social growth by offering transient accommodation for the homeless, tackling the problem of low-cost housing, and encouraging societal inclusion. Specifically, this part looks at how converting a hotel can accomplish these three goals.
Firstly, repurposing an existing hotel into a transitional refuge for the homeless is one way to meet their emergency housing needs. This choice is convenient and economical since hotels have already been constructed and furnished with essential amenities. From the survey results in figure 1, it is evident that those with no place to call home are the needy people in need of temporary housing. In the event that an emergency arises, such as an epidemic or a catastrophic event, it is helpful to have the ability to lodge many people; hotels offer this capacity (Le and Giang 2). Those currently without homes can be provided with the chance to have a secure environment in which to sleep, eat, exercise, and access other essential utilities if they are supplied with makeshift housing. This strategy allows support organizations to provide supplementary solutions such as therapy for mental health issues, career guidance, and hospital attention.
Secondly, one solution to the problem of lack of inexpensive accommodation is repurposing an existing building, such as a hotel, into a transient refuge. An essential factor that contributes to homelessness is the inadequate availability of low-cost housing (Batterham 4). It is feasible for state officials or other partners to provide refuge at a reduced cost, making it available to more people if they transform hotels into homes. This choice comes in especially handy in situations in which there is a greater demand for low-cost housing than there is availability. In addition, this strategy may result in lower overall costs than the construction of brand-new homes from the ground up.
Thirdly, converting an existing hotel into a short-term refuge is another way to encourage participation from the surrounding area. When neighborhood members become aware that there is a demand for shelter, they could be more open to supporting initiatives that aim to meet that need. By involving the public, individuals and groups can voluntarily contribute their time, money, and skills to the cause of assisting the homeless population (Shinn and Jill 151). In addition, this method increases awareness and comprehension of displacement, which may ultimately result in more permanent solutions. Fourth, most hotels are situated in places that provide convenient access to essential services, such as medical facilities, food banks, and job prospects. People can better utilize these amenities, promoting their physical health and well-being and enabling them to become more self-sufficient if hotels are converted into temporary shelters for the homeless.
Fifth, changing hotels into emergency shelters can create new work opportunities for those in the surrounding community. These may include employment in management, food service, security, general upkeep, and repair. By creating chances for employment, governments may contribute to expanding the local economy and advancing the cause of social progress (Shinn and Jill 151). Therefore, transforming a hotel into a shelter for the temporarily homeless can positively affect social development. It tackles the shortage of inexpensive housing while promoting social inclusion and providing immediate homes for homeless people.
Finally, temporary shelters can stimulate creativity and contribute to social progress in numerous ways. While creating temporary shelters, architects and designers must think creatively to develop practical and effective solutions that can be made rapidly and meet basic living needs. This promotes inventiveness in architecture and problem-solving abilities. In addition, temporary shelters frequently rely on scarce resources to develop their constructions, such as affordable or renewable paper (Ribeiro et al. 5). Thus, this encourages creative professionals to utilize assets wisely, a concept that can be extended to various design aspects.
Consequently, temporary shelters must be adaptive to various environmental conditions. As such, this needs novel ideas that can be applied rapidly and effectively. Therefore, this encourages an environment of versatility and adaptability, which may be extended to various design fields. This argument may not be a permanent remedy to the problem of homelessness, but it can be a significant step in identifying a solution to this widespread social problem. Transforming hotels into transitory homes is a methodology that legislators, federal agencies, and other interested parties must recognize. Thus, this is because this technique is workable and cost-effective in providing emergency accommodation to those in need.
The Safety Problem in the Area by Converting a Hotel to a Temporary Shelter
When towns are confronted with a housing problem or catastrophic events like environmental hazards or epidemics, one alternative that many municipalities contemplate is transforming a hotel into a makeshift shelter for those in need of temporary accommodation. Nevertheless, while such a transition can offer much-needed momentary accommodation, it can pose new security issues that must be resolved to protect the people living in the converted space and the surrounding neighborhood. The following are some potential safety concerns that may arise: firstly, to safeguard their customers from the dangers of a fire, hotels are constructed with stringent fire safety systems, such as fire alarms, sprinklers, and emergency exits (Batterham 10). Temporary shelters may not perpetually have the same safety elements installed, which may provide a hazard not only to the individuals residing in the homes but also to the community located in the surrounding area. Furthermore, occupants of short-lived housing might not receive the appropriate instruction in fire safety, which boosts the probability that they would be involved in an accident or sustain an injury.
Secondly, to guarantee their patrons’ protection, hotels are often constructed with high-security features, such as guarded entryways and video monitoring, as part of the building’s infrastructure. Temporary shelters, on the other hand, may not have identical safety protocols in place, making them more susceptible to trespassing and criminal activity. Thus, this can affect the security of the population located in the immediate neighborhood, especially if there is a rise in the rate of thefts or damages to property. Thirdly, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, making sure that momentary shelters have the necessary supplies to stop the virus from spreading further is essential (Rosenthal et al., 241). Accommodations typically have private toilets, significantly minimizing the probability of spreading sickness. Consequently, temporary shelters may have public amenities, raising the likelihood of illness transmission. Furthermore, there is a possibility that makeshift housing lack access to proper ventilators or cleaning materials, which may further compound concerns regarding public health.
Fourthly, the transformation of a hotel into a temporary refuge may have the possibility to have a detrimental effect on the community that is immediately adjacent to the hotel. For instance, there may be a rise in pedestrian traffic and idling, resulting in complaints about community security and harm to public equipment. There may be worries regarding the long-term influence of the temporary shelter on the area’s business and the property’s worth. Additionally, before a hotel can be turned into a home, the structural condition of the structure needs to be inspected to ensure it can properly and securely house people during an contingency (Wallace et al. 85). Properties that have been vacant for an extended period or abandoned may have structural flaws that need to be rectified before being inhabited securely.
Finally, due to various variables, transforming a hotel into makeshift housing may burden emergency offerings in an area. Among these concerns is the rising need for responders. Turning a hotel into a temporary shelter will result in more individuals living in the neighborhood, increasing the need for rescue services. Population growth will increase the number of medical situations, injuries, and crimes requiring the assistance of rescue workers (Moffa et al. 337). In addition, converting a hotel into a temporary accommodation may result in overpopulation, leading to numerous issues. For example, overpopulation can boost the probability of bacterial contamination, fire breakouts, and other situations requiring the involvement of emergency services. As a result, the flood of new residents may pressure the current infrastructure. It is possible that the roadways, water and drainage mechanisms, and other amenities will not meet the additional demand, resulting in service interruptions and situations requiring the involvement of rescue services.
As such, converting a hotel into a temporary shelter can raise several safety problems in the neighborhood, specifically if insufficient planning and preparedness are done in advance. The above notion is summarized in figure 2, which displays the survey result undertaken on the issue. It is vital to consider the associated consequences and to take actions to prevent them, such as enhancing security precautions, establishing fire safety precautions, and ensuring that healthcare standards are in effect. When this is done, it is feasible to lessen the influence on the neighborhood that is close by and come up with a solution for a temporary shelter that is both secure and efficient.
Conclusion
In conclusion, transforming an existing hotel into a short-term refuge offers several advantages that cannot be overlooked. Firstly, the government should invest in refurbishing or constructing additional shelters to accommodate the growing number of individuals without homes. Secondly, providing a secure and dependable atmosphere for people and households without a home will contribute to the social growth resulting from the establishment of temporary shelters. Finally, one solution to safety issues in the neighborhood is to repurpose an existing hotel as a transitory shelter for those in need. The state can demonstrate its dedication to solving homelessness, which is an essential step towards attaining social fairness, by financing the creation of additional shelters or renovating existing ones.
Makeshift housing can provide individuals and families with fundamental life needs, such as meals and healthcare, and offer support solutions, such as professional development, psychological treatment, and substance abuse rehabilitation services. These services can be provided to those in need in need. Furthermore, temporary shelters have the potential to have a beneficial impact on society as a whole by lowering the incidence of crime and raising the standard of living in the neighboring shelter. Implementing appropriate security measures is one way to manage the possible security risks that may arise from transforming a hotel into a temporary shelter.
These steps can help to forestall the occurrence of any potential safety problems that may occur. Therefore, there are various advantages for the people without homes and the society as a whole when a hotel is converted into a temporary refuge. To combat homelessness and foster social advancement, governments must invest in constructing more facilities or refurbishing current ones. A society must be healthy and fair, and achieving this can help government guarantee that everyone has recourse to a living environment that is secure and stable.
Works Cited
Batterham, Deb. “Defining “At-Risk of Homelessness”: Re-Connecting Causes, Mechanisms and Risk.” Housing, Theory and Society, vol. 36, no. 1, 2019, pp. 1-24. Web.
Baxter, Andrew J., et al. “Effects of Housing First approaches on Health and Well-Being of Adults who are Homeless or at Risk of Homelessness: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 73, no. 5, 2019, pp. 379-387. Web.
Culhane, Dennis P., and Seongho An. “Estimated Revenue of the Nonprofit Homeless Shelter Industry in the United States: Implications for a more Comprehensive Approach to Unmet Shelter Demand.” Housing Policy Debate, vol. 32, no. 6, 2022, pp. 823-836. Web.
Kim, Mikyung, et al. “Problems and Implications of Shelter Planning Focusing on Habitability: A Case Study of a Temporary Disaster Shelter after the Pohang Earthquake in South Korea.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 6, 2021, pp. 1-16. Web.
Le, Dung, and Giang Phi. “Strategic Responses of the Hotel Sector to COVID-19: Toward a Refined Pandemic Crisis Management Framework.” International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 94, 2021, pp. 1-5. Web.
Moffa, Michelle, et al. “A Systematic Scoping Review of Environmental Health Conditions and Hygiene Behaviors in Homeless Shelters.” International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, vol. 222, no. 3, 2019, pp. 335-346. Web.
Ribeiro, et al. “Urban Resilience: A Conceptual Framework.” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 50, 2019, pp. 1-42. Web.
Rosenthal, Diana Margot, et al. “Impacts of COVID-19 on Vulnerable Children in Temporary Accommodation in the UK.” The Lancet Public Health, vol. 5, no. 5, 2020, pp 241-242. Web.
Shinn, Marybeth, and Jill Khadduri. In the Midst of Plenty: Homelessness and What to Do About It. John Wiley & Sons, 2020.
Smith, R. K. (2022). International Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press.
Wallace, Bruce, et al. “Sheltering Risks: Implementation of Harm Reduction in Homeless Shelters during an Overdose Emergency.” International Journal of Drug Policy, vol. 53, 2018, pp. 83-89. Web.