Cost Allocation Methods in the Companies Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda®
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

Introduction

Production overheads are costs incurred in an organization that cannot be directly attributed to any products. Therefore, the costs should be shared across the products. The overheads need to be shared fairly to ensure that the gains from the sale of the product are not understated. There are three main steps of sharing the production overheads. These processes are the allocation of costs, apportionment, and absorption of costs. This paper discusses various methods of allocating costs (traditional method and activity-based costing) using two companies.

Hula Hug Corporation

Part one – allocation of cost using the traditional method

Total overhead131,200
Roundabout67,200
Sassafras64,000

Part two – activity proportions

Activity-based costing assigns actual consumption to each cost center. Activity proportions are used for each unit. The activity proportions are summarized in the table below.

Material handling19,650
Number of moves1000
Cost per move19.65
Quality control78,750
Number of inspections10,500
Cost per inspection7.5
Maintenance32,800
Number of machine hours41,000
Cost per machine hour0.80

From the table, the activity proportions for material handling is $19.65, quality control is $7.5, and maintenance is $0.80.

Part three – allocation of overhead

The table below summarizes the costs allocated to each cost center.

Roundabout model
Material handling11,298.75
Quality control45,000
Maintenance16,800
Total overhead73,098.75

The total overhead for the roundabout model amounts to $73,098.75.

Part four – allocation of cost

Sassafras model
Material handling8,351.25
Quality control33,750
Maintenance16,000
Total overhead58,101.25

The total overhead for the Sassafras model amounts to $58,101.25.

Part Five – comparison of costs

TraditionalABC costing
Roundabout model67,20073,098.75
Sassafras model64,00058,101.25

From the table, ABC costing assigns more costs to the Roundabout model than the traditional costing. The ABC method is more accurate than the traditional method of allocating costs.

Gutierrez Company

Part one – traditional costing method

Machine hoursPercentageOverhead assigned
Sportsman model1,40050%5,590
Expedition model1,40050%5,590
11,180

Based on the traditional method of cost accounting both sportsman and expedition models will have an equal amount of cost amounting to $5,590

Part two – Production cost per unit

The table below summarizes the production cost per unit under the traditional costing system.

Allocated costNumber of unitsOverhead assigned
Sportsman model5,5901,2004.658
Expedition model5,5909605.82

The overhead per unit of sportsman model amounts to $4.658 while for expedition amounts to $5.82. This implies that the production of more units reduces the cost per unit. The table below summarizes the total cost per unit of the models.

Sportsman modelExpedition model
Direct material2028
Direct labor1519
Overhead4.665.82
Unit cost39.6652.82

Part three – gross margin

Sportsman modelExpedition model
Price per unit82105
Unit cost39.6652.82
Gross margin$42.34$52.18

Part four – activity proportions

Setup costs65
Quality control12.50
Maintenance1.10

Part Five – overhead assigned

SportsmanExpedition
Setup cost9101690
Quality control1,7503,750
Maintenance1,5401,540
Total4,2006,980
Overhead per unit3.57.27

Part six – Production cost per unit

Sportsman modelExpedition model
Direct material2028
Direct labor1519
Overhead3.57.27
Unit cost38.5054.27

Part seven – gross margin

Sportsman modelExpedition model
Price per unit82105
Unit cost38.554.27
Gross margin$43.5$50.73

Part eight – comparison of gross profit margin

Sportsman modelExpedition model
Gross margin (traditional)$42.34$52.18
Gross margin (ABC)$43.5$50.73

The traditional approach yields higher profit for the expedition model while under ABC the profitability of the model reduces. The gross margin for sportsmen under the traditional method was lower than that under the ABC method.

Print
More related papers
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, May 11). Cost Allocation Methods in the Companies. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cost-allocation-methods-in-the-companies/

Work Cited

"Cost Allocation Methods in the Companies." IvyPanda, 11 May 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/cost-allocation-methods-in-the-companies/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Cost Allocation Methods in the Companies'. 11 May.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Cost Allocation Methods in the Companies." May 11, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cost-allocation-methods-in-the-companies/.

1. IvyPanda. "Cost Allocation Methods in the Companies." May 11, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cost-allocation-methods-in-the-companies/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Cost Allocation Methods in the Companies." May 11, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cost-allocation-methods-in-the-companies/.

Powered by CiteTotal, online essay citation generator
If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
Cite
Print
1 / 1