We will write a custom Article on Dual Role of Clinical and Administrative Supervision specifically for you
301 certified writers online
The introductory section of this study contains a literature review of the dual role of clinical and administrative supervision. The sources used by the authors are relatively old because many of them were published in the early nineties or even seventies, while this article was released in 2007. The literature review indicates there are some important gaps, such as the reasons why some supervisees could express dissatisfaction with experiences in the workplace.
The main purpose of this study is to show how supervisees respond to the cooperation with a person who exercises both clinical and administrative control. This study does not incorporate a specific hypothesis, but researchers formulate several research questions related to the perceptions of supervisees. Although this topic has already been examined by other scholars, the authors of this article show how the attitudes of supervisees are formed.
The sample of this study includes 353 residents (Tromski-Klingshirn & Davis, 2007). The participants were supervised for at least 3000 hours. It was the main criterion, according to which these people were selected. The researchers apply such a measurement tool as a Clinical Supervision Questionnaire. Furthermore, they use Modified Supervision Questionnaire. The participants were surveyed via email. The subjects had three weeks to answer the questions. The collected data was analyzed with the help of ANNOVA.
The findings of the study indicate that supervisees do not usually express any discontent with dual supervision. In particular, only 13.13 percent of the respondents expressed dissatisfaction while working with people who were administrative and clinical supervisors at the same time (Tromski-Klingshirn & Davis, 2007).
Additionally, the results of ANNOVA indicate that there are no statistical differences between people who are exposed to dual supervision and those individuals who worked with two supervisors. The participants were primarily Caucasian. Their age ranges from 23 to 60 (Tromski-Klingshirn & Davis, 2007). Additionally, the majority of them had a post-graduate degree.
As it has been said before, the authors do not include a specific hypothesis. Instead, the scholars examine several limitations of this study. In particular, the sample was rather small. This argument is particularly relevant if one speaks about supervisees representing the in-patient group. Moreover, the results can be applied only to those people who have a post-graduate degree. Nevertheless, the findings are consistent with the results derived by other researchers.
This article can be important for readers who intend to work as hospital administrators. These professionals need to design more effective workplace procedures. This is one of the main benefits that can be singled out. One of the problems is that the researchers do not fully identify the practical implications of this research. In this way, one can clearly benefit readers who read empirical articles in order to improve their work of medical institutions.
Furthermore, the study could have been improved if the writers had included tables and charts because these visual aids are useful for the retrieval of the necessary information. Nevertheless, It is possible to accept the authors’ conclusions because they are based on sound research design. Furthermore, scholars clearly identify the scope of their research.
This study should not be overlooked because the findings can assist hospital administrators who are supposed to design more effective workplace procedures. This article is not related to the field of child development. Nevertheless, this article may be considered to medical workers who work with children. These are the main details that can be distinguished.
Tromski-Klingshirn, D., & Davis, T. (2007). Supervisees’ Perceptions of Their Clinical Supervision: A Study of the Dual Role of Clinical and Administrative Supervisor. Counselor Education & Supervision, 46(4), 294-304.