There have been numerous attempts to realize the multiple factors that lead to injustice. One of the most problematic issues concerning the inefficiencies of the legal system is the relatively low investigation rate of specific murder cases. The analysis of the phenomenon helps to understand the complicated complete picture featuring inequality as one of the significant factors. Thus, the legal system has proven to systematically neglect the investigation of criminal cases with a specific type of victim.
Analyzing the lack of equality and various types of discrimination in the legal system is a complex undertaking featuring multiple controversies. Meadows (2018) claims that incompetence and inefficiency demonstrated by various people employed by the system often lead to injustice. At the same time, it has become vivid that the public itself also shows less interest in tragic cases involving people from certain demographic groups. “Less dead” has become a widely used term that is inappropriate, as it undermines the ability or the motivation of the legal system to investigate certain types of crime. Sex workers, drug dealers, and different types of minorities are the groups that are sometimes referred to as “less dead” by journalists and writers.
Emerging evidence suggests that the legal system, in general, tends to undermine the importance of certain types of criminal activity. Moreover, they do it deliberately by putting less effort into analyzing murder cases where the victim can be labeled “less dead”. The professionals who are expected to protect and serve often do not care about groups exposed to the most significant risks. Therefore, the term “less dead” is inappropriate and should not be used, as it seeks to explain police investigators’ lack of motivation to protect the most vulnerable people who often become victims.
Reference
Meadows, R. J. (2018). Understanding violence and victimization (7th ed.). Pearson.