Forum: Student Evaluation in Nursing Essay

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda

Introduction

Registered nurses must provide training to nursing colleagues or students from other programs at one point in their careers. In response, nurses need to have the right evaluation skills to assess how well the students or colleagues have understood the training (Bastable, 2019). The evaluation may involve collecting and using the information to determine whether the training was successful. Additionally, it lets the nurses know whether the training was positive and what they need to do to improve their practice. This study will evaluate five ways to assess and evaluate students, create a rubric to grade an oral presentation and design a clinical evaluation tool for a nurse educator.

We will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Essay on Forum: Student Evaluation in Nursing
808 writers online

Ways of assessing and evaluating students

One of the primary methods for assessing nurses is using test scores. Students must take tests to evaluate their basic understanding of nursing procedures and gauge their knowledge of medical terms (Bastable, 2019). These tests can be done in a class setting or online exams. Most of these exams are graded to one hundred percent, and therefore, it is the nurse educator’s responsibility to determine the pass mark. While some allow students to fail twice or thrice, others only allow a student to fail once before being dismissed from the program. This is one of the commonly used methods to assess the student’s capability to recall what they have been trained in.

The other method of evaluating students is nursing competencies. These include the various nursing procedures that nurses must perform before they are integrated into the real health workforce. These procedures are essential, and they include the basic first aid routines, patient tests and operation of some clinical devices (Bastable, 2019). Therefore, nurse educators have to use a checklist to determine the effectiveness of students in performing these tasks. On the other hand, the students should be able to thoroughly complete the tasks before they are assigned various duties or even adopted into a nursing program.

Nurse educators may use clinical evaluations to assess students. This is whereby the student nurses work together with other healthcare professionals such as nurse educators, doctors, and real patients to enhance their skills and get the overall picture of what they are supposed to be doing (Billings & Halstead, 2020). In this case, the nurse educator assesses the students according to their interaction with patients and the tasks they perform as well. Clinical evaluation is conducted by nurse educators who have vast knowledge in the nursing field and may have to seek feedback from their educators to know how well a student performed.

Nursing educators can use the grading system to rank overall student performance. During the training or education period, nurse educators can assign grades to students based on their attendance and performance. These metrics are then combined at the end of the training period to determine the student’s commitment and understanding of the taught concepts (Wei et al., 2021). This system is used to ensure that students meet the criteria of a given program. In most courses or training sessions, a grade of A is regarded as a distinction, B is satisfactory, C is a Pass, D is marginal, and F is failing. If a student scores D or F, they may be required to repeat the training to understand better what is expected of them in practice.

The final method used by nursing educators is the National Licensing Exam (NCLEX). This is the exam that nurse students have to take when applying for their licenses. These exams allow the educator to gauge their training skills and compare themselves with other educators in the state (Wei et al., 2021). An external agency governs the exams that the government approves to conduct the tests. The agency should not be affiliated with the school or nursing care in which the student was trained. In the US, the state government determines the pass marks for their NCLEX exams, which determines whether the students who pass will get grants or state funding. Before joining these schools, prospective students analyze these rates to determine the right place for them.

Grading rubric for an oral presentation

ObjectivesA – ExcellentB – SatisfactoryC – PassD – MarginalF – FailScore
Introduction, problem statement, and aims/purpose/ objectivesThe student clearly discusses the introduction, problem of the oral presentation, and aims/purpose/objectives and links it to the paper (Stanley et al., 2020).The student discusses the introduction, problem of the oral presentation, and aims/purpose/objectives and does not link it to the paperThe student states the introduction, problem of the oral presentation, and aims/purpose/objectives with some discussion and does not link it to the paperThe student states the introduction, problem of the oral presentation, and aims/purpose/objectives without concise discussion and does not link it to the paper (Stanley et al., 2020).The student states the does not state the introduction, problem of the oral presentation, and aims/purpose/objectives
Background, significance, and the impact it has on the populationThe student clearly discusses background, significance, and the impact on the population with clear examplesThe student provides satisfactory discussion on the background, significance, and the impact on the population without clear examplesThe student provides some discussion on the background, significance, and the impact on the population without examplesThe student provides minimal discussion on the background, significance, and the impact on the population without any examples (Stanley et al., 2020)The student does not discuss the background, significance, and the impact on the population and does not provide any examples
Synthesis of the evidence provided in the oral presentationThe evidence provided is synthesized, and the student discusses the comprehensive strengths and weaknesses (Stanley et al., 2020)Adequate evidence is provided and synthesized; the student discusses the comprehensive strengths and weaknessesInadequate evidence is provided and not synthesized; the student does not discuss the comprehensive strengths and weaknessesEvidence is identified by not clear analysis; The student does not discuss the comprehensive strengths and weaknessesThe evidence Is not included
Data analysis and resultsThe correct data analysis method is used, and results are well presented and describedCorrect data analysis methods and results are adequately presented and describedThe correct data analysis method is used, but the results are poorly represented and describedIncorrect data analysis methods with poor or no presentation and description (Stanley et al., 2020)No data analysis included at all
Discussion and how the results are related to the aims presented at the aimsDiscussion is well arranged and linked to the oral project aimsDiscussion is arranged satisfactorily and linked to the oral project aimsDiscussion is arranged poorly and linked to the oral project aimsDiscussion is arranged poorly and not linked to the oral project aimsNo discussion
Presentation designThe presentation is excellently organizedThe presentation is organized to a satisfactory level (Stanley et al., 2020)The presentation is somewhat organizedThe presentation is poorly organizedPresentation is disorganized
Presentation format including text, font, layout, tables, charts and so onThe presentation format is succinct and demonstrates professionalismThe format is succinct and shows adequate professionalismThe format is inconsistent but shows some professional qualityThe format is inconsistent and does not display any professionalismThe presentation is poor and disorganized
Oral presentationThe presenter had a professional appearance and was well prepared for questionsThe presenter had a professional appearance and was somewhat prepared for questionsThe presenter had a professional appearance but had difficulty answering questions (Stanley et al., 2020)The presenter did not have a professional appearance and was not prepared for questionsThe presenter was unprepared
Total

Clinical evaluation tool

Student Name: ……………………………………………
Year: …………………………….
Clinical Facility: …………………………………………..
Students will be evaluated using the following: The final marks will be multiplied by the five to get the total percentage score. The PassMark is 70%.
Proficient: 4
Satisfactory: 3
Needs improvement: 2
Unsatisfactory: 1
Core competencies
  1. The general overview of the student is based on how they understand health behavior and how other factors such as climate change, cultural factors, and interpersonal factors affect them
Score
Professionalism
  1. The student’s dress code and general appearance it is in line with the policies and code of ethics of the healthcare facility
  2. The student promptly reports to all assigned activities and, in case of absenteeism, notifies the instructor (Cooper et al., 2020)
  3. Treat other employees and staff with respect and has non-judgemental behavior against other.
  4. The student demonstrates honesty, integrity, and professional accountability
Score
Teamwork and Collaboration
  1. Interacts with other staff creatively and engages them in professional roles through delegation, supervision, and advocacy (Cooper et al., 2020)
  2. The student follows the correct communication channel when communicating relevant information
  3. The student can coordinate and work effectively with other team members
  4. The student values diversity and gives every person in the group an opportunity to air their views
Score
Patient-centered care
  1. The student values emotional, physical, cultural, religious, and spiritual components in caring for the patient as well as him or herself
  2. The student can develop an individualized plan for patients while prioritizing the needs, values, and preferences of the patient
  3. Respects diversity of different people in the care
Score
Evidence-based practice
  1. Uses evidence-based practices which help in ensuring cost-effective care to the patient
  2. Uses literature and theories to justify gaps and interventions for patients
  3. Uses the available technology, principles, and evidence-based practice to make decisions (Cooper et al., 2020)
  4. The student demonstrates the ability to integrate evidence-based learning with clinical practice
Score
Safety
  1. Uses the standardized procedures to enhance safety when using tools in care
  2. Works within the ethical practice
  3. Uses the right apparel to ensure his or her safety when in practice (Cooper et al., 2020)
  4. Develops individualized plans within the legal framework that are safe and meet the patient’s individual needs.

Conclusion

The nurse educator has a significant role in helping nursing students upgrade their level of care and integrating students from other faculties into the nursing field. The registered nurses must ensure that before a student nurse is upgraded, they meet all the criteria for the specific program. Therefore, they must use the above-stated methods such as test scores, nursing competencies, clinical evaluations, grading system, and the National Licensing Exam for evaluating and assessing their students to ensure that they are successfully ready for the roles ahead of them. This study has also provided a clinical evaluation in the appendix, which educator nurses can use for assessing the student’s capabilities.

1 hour!
The minimum time our certified writers need to deliver a 100% original paper

References

Bastable, S. (2019). Nurse as Educator : Principles of Teaching and Learning for Nursing Practice (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Billings, D., & Halstead, J. A. (2020). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (6th ed.). Elsevier.

Cooper, S., Cant, R., Waters, D., Luders, E., Henderson, A., Willetts, G., Tower, M., Reid-Searl, K., Ryan, C., & Hood, K. (2020). BMC Nursing, 19(1), 1-10. Web.

Stanley, D., Coman, S., Murdoch, D., & Stanley, K. (2020). Nurse Education in Practice, 49, 102851. Web.

Wei, W., Liu, J., Liu, Y., Kang, Y., Luo, R., & Zhang, X. (2021). Medicine, 100(47), 1-7. Web.

Print
Need an custom research paper on Forum: Student Evaluation in Nursing written from scratch by a professional specifically for you?
808 writers online
Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2023, October 18). Forum: Student Evaluation in Nursing. https://ivypanda.com/essays/forum-student-evaluation-in-nursing/

Work Cited

"Forum: Student Evaluation in Nursing." IvyPanda, 18 Oct. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/forum-student-evaluation-in-nursing/.

References

IvyPanda. (2023) 'Forum: Student Evaluation in Nursing'. 18 October.

References

IvyPanda. 2023. "Forum: Student Evaluation in Nursing." October 18, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/forum-student-evaluation-in-nursing/.

1. IvyPanda. "Forum: Student Evaluation in Nursing." October 18, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/forum-student-evaluation-in-nursing/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Forum: Student Evaluation in Nursing." October 18, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/forum-student-evaluation-in-nursing/.

Powered by CiteTotal, online essay bibliography generator
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Request the removal
More related papers
Cite
Print
1 / 1