Home > Free Essays > Business > Managerial Negotiation > Game Theory

Game Theory Term Paper

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda
Updated: Oct 5th, 2019

Introduction

Game theory incorporates a recognized study of disagreements and partnerships. Game theory has diverse concepts that are applicable to the activities of numerous means, which are interdependent. The negotiators might encompass of individuals, groups, governments, or an amalgamation of these. The game theory procedure offers a language to develop, assemble, analyze, and comprehend strategic situations (Myerson 5).

Game theory takes place from the daily activities that people undertake such as problem mapping. The activity of matching problems such as whether a student should sublet his or her room on campus for other benefits connotes generates a conflict. The theory emanates from the notion that decision-making entails conflicts and cooperation (Myerson 5). The game forms the subject of study in the theory.

Cooperative game theory

Cooperative game theory incorporates a high-level reference that identifies only the gains each group or alliance obtains when its adherents work in solidarity. However, the game does not describe the procedure employed to create the alliance. For example, the voting systems in politics sometimes require coalition development (Myerson 217).

The voting takes place without an explanation on the negotiations conducted behind the scenes. Cooperative game theory explores the coalition creation deals based on the level of power held by different partners. Furthermore, cooperative theory elucidates sharing of gains generated from such deals.

Nash suggested a method to share gains realized from coalition making processes (Myerson 96). He suggested a bargaining strategy founded on the strengths of the individual parties making the coalition.

Non -cooperative game theory

Non – cooperative game theory deals with the categorization of strategic choices. The theory operates on the precincts that details of the arrangements and the timing of the release of choices plays a role in determining the ending. Nash suggested that an ideal bargaining strategy would indicate a particular procedure that predetermines how and when the actors in the game can make their offers (Myerson 92).

Normal Form Game

The normal form signifies a simple type of game that employs a strategic method. The approach requires actors to provide their tactics and the possible effects that can emerge singly or through incorporation of diverse sets. The distinct payoff every actor gets connotes the results (Myerson 189). The payoff signifies a number. The term utility connotes the number. Utility helps in defining how much the participant prefers the result.

Extensive Form Game

The extensive form has more details than the normal form does. The extensive form is a comprehensive explanation of how actors can play the game in an extended period (Tadelis 129). The game has guidelines that entail the criteria players follow as they engage in the process. The rule also characterizes the extent of information actors can hold as they participate in the process.

Furthermore, the rule stipulates the times when uncertainties associated with the game are determined (Tadelis 129). Applicable direct approaches help in the scrutiny of competitions in extensive forms. Transformation of negotiations in extensive forms into corresponding premeditated forms also facilitates the scrutiny.

Nash Equilibrium

The concept has a more general approach. The equilibrium makes recommendations on appropriate strategies to different players. The payers do not have the powers to change the strategies on their own (Tadelis 145). It is notable that antagonist adheres with the provided recommendations.

The rationality approach applies in this theory. The equilibrium also emerges through the expectations that all players are rational (Tadelis 145). Therefore, Nash equilibrium suggests that every player can expect their competitors to adhere to the recommendations.

Works Cited

Myerson, Roger B. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2013. Print.

Tadelis, Steven. Game Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2013. Print.

This term paper on Game Theory was written and submitted by your fellow student. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly.
Removal Request
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda.
Request the removal

Need a custom Term Paper sample written from scratch by
professional specifically for you?

801 certified writers online

Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2019, October 5). Game Theory. https://ivypanda.com/essays/game-theory/

Reference

IvyPanda. (2019, October 5). Game Theory. Retrieved from https://ivypanda.com/essays/game-theory/

Work Cited

"Game Theory." IvyPanda, 5 Oct. 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/game-theory/.

1. IvyPanda. "Game Theory." October 5, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/game-theory/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Game Theory." October 5, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/game-theory/.

References

IvyPanda. 2019. "Game Theory." October 5, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/game-theory/.

References

IvyPanda. (2019) 'Game Theory'. 5 October.

Powered by CiteTotal, best reference machine
More related papers