God’s Doctrine Through His Wrath and Love Research Paper

Introduction

The doctrine of God is fundamental to understanding the canons of the Christian Church. The concepts of the Almighty’s love and wrath are integral divine attributes that can be interpreted differently but are equally critical to discuss to unravel this Biblical conundrum. In this regard, the historical development of God’s doctrine suggests that his rage and mercy are fundamentally interconnected components of his holiness. As per the divergent account, anger is opposed to love, while the unitary account views God’s punishment as an expression of love. The inconsistency in the interpretation is reflected in the depiction of the divine wrath in the Old Testament and the New Testament, and the burning rage against sinners in the Old Covenant frequently prevents people from perceiving such a response as a loving gesture. At the same time, both rage and mercy are viewed as divine attributes deriving from God’s holiness and striving for justice. As a foundation of Christian theology, God’s doctrine should be examined through his wrath and love as intertwined components, equally critical to be understood for a relevant interpretation of the tenets of the Christian faith.

Historical Development of the God’s Doctrine

To begin with, the definition of God’s doctrine and related notions should be provided. According to Holmes, in the late 19^th century, a theological resurgence of the Trinity was observed due to theologians such as Rahner, Barth, Zizioulas, Moltmann, and others who attempted to rehabilitate this concept. In this regard, God in Christianity can be defined as the eternal being that exists as three persons in one: the Father, the Son, incarnate as Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. It is worth noting that neither the Old Testament nor the New Testament teaches the trinitarian doctrine explicitly; however, many philosophers and theologians suggest that it is implied by the portrayal of the Almighty. Hence, a detailed look at the concept of God through his wrath and love could provide valuable insight and a basis for interpreting the biblical perspective on the issue.

Evidence can be found revealing God as the divine being marked both by love and wrath. At the same time, widespread denial of the doctrine of rage can be observed along with the emphasis placed on love, which can involve a distorted view of God and imply an incompatibility between these two characteristics. Understanding both the kind and the punitive natures is critical to a balanced outlook on this subject. At the same time, the investigation of the biblical perspective on the wrath and love of God, as well as their connection, can be conducted through two contrasting theological paradigms: the divergent account and the unitary account. As claimed by Wesslings, the former interprets the divine anger as an opposite to his love, while the latter pictures rage as an integral part of the Almighty’s kindness which includes punishment to maintain justice. In this regard, the unitary account implies the intrinsic nature of the doctrines of God’s love and wrath, which offers a fresh look at the divine power.

The Biblical Doctrine of God’s Wrath

As a rule, God’s wrath is regarded as an attribute stemming from his commitment to holiness and justice. The biblical doctrine of the rage of the Almighty should be considered as equally vital to the Gospel as his love. Otherwise, risk of misconception is involved, and God’s anger can be viewed as a primitive response similar to that of a human being, which would be misleading in view of the divine holiness. As noted by Zahnd, looking at the theological ideas through the contemporary lens can be both beneficial and deceptive since a portray of a wrathful God punishing sinners divert many people from fully grasping this essential concept. At the same time, the interpretation of the idea of the Almighty’s anger should be supported by evidence.

Genocide in the Old Testament appears to contrast the loving nature of the God reflected in Jesus and his compassionate nature depicted in the New Testament. In this regard, McCarthy claims that the moral perspective on the issue assumes that no substance can be found behind the biblical scenes of the divine punishment. At the same time, Zahnd argues that God’s anger is essential and inseparably incorporated into love. Such viewpoints on this subject should be analyzed with regard to the biblical doctrine of God’s wrath. In particular, Zahnd states that “the psalmist and the prophet move back and forth, sometimes within the same verse: light and dark, good and evil, power and comfort, transcendence and immanence, faithfulness and abandonment,” which emphasizes the idea of the integral and ambiguous nature of God’s love and wrath. Furthermore, the divine rage always pursues the purpose of punishing the sinners and restoring justice on the earth.

It should be noted that God is marked by the holy attribute, which prevents his reactions from being human-like and purely anger- or frustration-driven. In this regard, the sinful nature of people differentiates the human wrath from that of the Almighty, who is attributed by perfection and wisdom. While God’s wrath is always directed against people, it is also rooted in humanity’s sins and the need for justice. In contrast, the parable of the Prodigal Son presents an example of human anger, which makes a person ill-natured and annoyed for the wrong reasons. At the same time, divine punishment is always designed and driven by a certain purpose. According to McCarthy, the display of God’s kindness and rage throughout the Bible is based on the concept of perfect justice. Wrath as a divine attribute is considered a prerequisite for fairness and an essential component of the doctrine of God. Therefore, it cannot be considered separately from another essential divine attribute, namely, the Almighty’s love.

The Biblical Doctrine of God’s Love

God’s love refers to the divine attribute which lies at the core of the Lord’s character. It can be viewed as an integral aspect of the doctrine of God. At the same time, love does not conflict with other qualities, such as justice, holiness, righteousness, and wrath. Understanding the comprehensive nature of the divine kindness and mercy declared in his word is critical to comprehend the doctrine of God as a whole. According to Edwards, “of the many good gifts the Lord has given his church on earth, none exceeds that of his love,” which emphasizes the importance of this divine attribute to the Christian faith. It is regarded as a never-ending source and a manifestation of future glory available through unity with the Holy Spirit. Edwards emphasizes that the struggles of the imperfect life on earth can be counterbalanced by people’s exposure to the biblical foundations for the cause, objects, enjoyment, and outcomes of God’s love. The Almighty reveals kindness in various ways, and each person’s path to finding this divine attribute, acceptance, and welcome can be different.

Generally, the biblical doctrine of God’s love can be discussed with regard to his portrayal in the Bible as a self-interpreting book. The creation of people with fruitfulness and blessing in mind manifests the Almighty’s kindness. Moreover, numerous examples such as the stories of Caleb and Joshua, Job, Jeremiah, Mary, and others, can be viewed as a reflection of God’s love. As stated by Kegler, the stories depicted in the Scripture are available for everyone without exceptions, which emphasizes the inclusive and merciful approach. At the same time, self-love is a critical aspect and a broader concept in contrast to a generic account of an act of love. Holmes notes that “the mind can only love itself if it knows itself, … and so offers a triad of self-love that includes the mind, its self-knowledge, and its self-love.” The triune nature of love can be found in the Bible since all the attributes of God are those of three persons. From the trinitarian perspective, the Lord’s kindness and mercy are the most obvious characteristics to consider; however, their theological consequences must be taken into account as well.

Theological Paradigms with Regard to the Connection between God’s Love and Wrath

Within the Scripture, God is depicted as loving yet vengeful towards those who sin. This biblical tension causes a difference in the perception of the Lord’s qualities and the way they are interconnected. For instance, “the killing of the firstborn children of Egypt or the Israelite conquest of Canaan” are examples of the Lord’s punitive anger, which can hardly reconcile with his love or justice. As a result, two broad paradigms emerged which are fundamentally different in their viewpoint on the divine attributes.

The Divergent Account

As mentioned above, the divergent account views God’s wrath as opposed to love. It is critical to approach these two doctrines and the relationship between them with a consideration of their definitions, roles, and portrayal in the Scripture. In particular, Wessling provides a systematic review of the fundamental issues with regard to the Lord’s punitive wrath and love which he aims to share with everyone willing to accept and receive it. The divergent account can be viewed as a theological framework based on the idea that “God punishes persons in a manner that is contrary to the demands of love.” Thus, wrath is viewed as a consequence of human sins.

This perspective on the divine attributes dates back to the epoch of Saint Augustine of Hippo. His writings teach that “God dispenses eternal postmortem punishment for the wrongs committed in this life, where the damned are burned with literal fire and tormented by fruitless repentance”. According to Wessling, the divergent account combines two forms: the implicit and the explicit, which highlights the dual nature of God’s holiness and warns against replacing it with a universal and monistic idea of the Almighty. In other words, the punishment is exercised when a human being deserves it and is not viewed as an integral component of his love; instead, it pursues a different goal. As per the divergent account, God’s wrath “need not aim to procure the good of the one punished as a father would his son, nor need it seek the good of others by educating them, deterring from future wrongdoing”. Hence, such a viewpoint opposes divine love and punishment.

The Unitary Account

The unitary account is an alternative theological paradigm that denies any conflict between God’s love and wrath. As stated by Wessling, this framework suggests that “divine punishment is motivated by love for the wrongdoer”. The unitary account provides two main arguments that contradict the idea of punitive wrath proclaimed by the divergent account. In particular, according to Isaac the Syrian, the loving purposes of God prevent him from executing punishment in ways incompatible with love. Furthermore, the ethic of love found in the New Testament suggests that the Lord avoids severe retribution. In other words, since God brought the world into existence out of love, this fundamental motivation aligns his divine attributes, including punitive wrath, with the purpose of guiding people’s affairs. From this perspective, every action of the Almighty can eventually be interpreted as an act of love, compassion, and mercy.

In addition, the unitary account suggests that God is aware of people’s sinfulness before the intention to create humanity. As a result, some theologists find absurd the possible conflict of the Almighty’s purposes stated by the divergent framework. The idea of severe retribution without the intention to guide the wrongdoers appears illogical in the view of God’s objective to create and govern the world with love. While Isaac the Syrian suggests a loving and well-meaning purpose behind the divine power, the writings of Duff and Gregory of Nyssa question this idea. Nevertheless, with the initial premise in mind, one can state that “if God never acts to render the future flourishing of any human impossible on account of that human’s sinfulness, then God does not punish with severe retribution”. As can be seen, the unitary account emphasizes the providential and creative purposes of the Almighty, while the divergent account which contrasts the divine wrath and love.

Implications of God’s Portrayal on the Doctrines of Wrath and Love

God’s Wrath

The Inconsistencies of God’s Wrath Portrayed in the Old Testament and the New Testament

The opposing views on the divine power and anger embodied in the divergent account and the unitary account are partially based on the inconsistencies of God’s wrath portrayed in the Old Testament in comparison to the New Testament. Carson takes a closer look at this issue and suggests that “both God’s love and God’s wrath are ratcheted up in the move from the old covenant to the new” until the redemptive history finds its resolution in the cross. The Old Testament portrays not only the grace of the Lord but also the anger in various experiences, such as death penalties, harsh and disproportionate punishments, as well as genocide in the name of God. As a result, the moral side of this matter is often questioned. However, the holy attribute provides a foundation for the conceptual difference in the Almighty’s purposes. The difference in people’s and God’s natures should be considered to prevent one from misunderstanding the divine wrath for that of humans.

In turn, the New Testament presents a shift to a new salvation era which began with Christ’s crucifixion, resurrection, and a subsequent glorification. The altered church and community are not designed for God’s wrath. Instead, the New Covenant appeals to an individual believer, which has defined a transformation of the punitive power into a loving correction. Hence, the biblical doctrine of divine punishment has evolved, which should be taken into consideration for a comprehensive understanding of this Christian tenet.

Wrath as a Divine Attribute

Wrath can thus be considered an integral divine attribute aiming to guide humanity. According to Storms, God’s “excellencies are not something appended to his being, but together are his being.” From this perspective, the Almighty is not comprised of elements that constitute a complex whole; instead, he can be viewed as a unity marked by all his attributes. Hence, it can be concluded that wrath is as equally critical as love. Oakes supports this idea by addressing the misconceptions that must be addressed as they can distort the view on the divine rage. God’s wrath can be referred to as a perfect and predestined antagonism to evil. It constitutes an integral part of the holy essence and pursues the goal of governing the world and leading it to prosperity. Such an outlook is supported by the fact that the Lord directs his rage against people that deliberately disregard what they know to be right and true.

Wrath as a Prerequisite for Justice

The doctrine of God should be considered with regard to the concept of justice in Christianity. This notion is based on the idea of the perfect harmony and conformity of the divine character, which can be seen as an embodiment of righteousness. Brewbaker explores the notions of mercy and punishment and considers the theological accounts of law, asserting that “all that can be said by the Christian about justice rests on a doctrine of God.” Therefore, justice and rectitude do not exist independently of the Almighty; instead, they constitute his essence and find reflection in all his actions and words.

The divine punishment is always designed to maintain fairness and is driven by a certain purpose, namely, guiding the human race. As mentioned by McCarthy, the display of God’s love and rage throughout the Bible is based on the concept of perfect or ultimate justice. For McGuiggan, suffering as an expression of God’s rage is “nothing other than his relentless, loving pursuit of us.” Wrath as a divine attribute is a prerequisite for fairness and a vital component of the doctrine of God. As a result, it cannot be considered separately from other essential divine attributes, namely, the Almighty’s holiness and love.

God’s Love

God’s Holiness

Holiness is a defining characteristic of God that defines both his power and goodness. It can be described as absolute moral excellence and purity, which finds an expression in every action and attribute of the Almighty. The biblical perspective on this matter emphasizes the statements referring to God’s magnificence, transcendence, and superiority, which allow for interpreting the holy as different. Within this framework, the doctrines of wrath and love can be re-evaluated and seen as attributed marked by holiness. According to McGuiggan, “suffering is a vital part of God’s work to redeem his creation.” In other words, this theory complies with the unitary account since it emphasizes the idea that divine punishment is rooted in sinful human nature. It pursues the goal of correcting, teaching, and guiding the wrongdoers.

Similarly, the historical development of God’s doctrine suggests that his mercy is fundamentally interconnected with the attribute of holiness. The righteous nature implies a loving perspective which is at the core of all the actions and words of the Almighty. This characteristic is immutable and motivated by God’s grace and well-natured intentions. At the same time, understanding both the loving and the punitive natures is essential to have a balanced outlook on this matter.

Love as a Prerequisite for Justice

As mentioned above, justice constitutes a foundation for the essence and attributes of God. Hence, love and righteousness can be viewed as interconnected characteristics of the divine. One should take into account the creative purpose of God, which provides a basis for building upon this concept and drawing connections among mercy, wrath, and holiness. As claimed by Kinghorn and Travis, justice derives from love which interconnects the notions of rage and mercy. As a merciful being, God behaves justly to humans as his creation, which further supports the idea that a fair approach prevails. The relationship between love and justice should be seen not as conflicting but as essential. As noted by Yoder, the standard for justice is “not whether people deserve it but whether they need it,” which implies that love is the driving force while justice is the outcome. In Christianity, justice derives from love as an ethical requirement, not a fractional sentiment. Thus, such a perspective follows the traditional conception of God’s love and emphasizes the holy nature behind all his actions towards the world.

Application for Church

Based on the discussion of God’s doctrine through his wrath and love, it is critical to evaluate its application for the church. To begin with, the notion of the Trinity is critical to the Christian faith and the historical development of its tenets. As Holmes states, since the late 19^th century, the theological resurgence of this concept can be seen, which is marked by an altered perception. The inconsistencies in the portrayal of God’s wrath and love provided a basis for the emergence of the two opposing doctrines implying different interpretations of the divine attributes. Since the genocide in the Old Testament often diverts people from grasping the concept of the Almighty’s rage as a divine attribute, Church can elaborate on the portrayals of the punishing power presented in the New Testament. At the same time, such an approach can distort people’s view of the essential excellencies of God. However, under the unitary account, all the harsh punishments described in the Scripture are driven by love. Furthermore, the new epoch of salvation implies a corrective and merciful nature of God’s rage, aiming to encourage people to avoid it.

The doctrines of divine wrath and mercy should be discussed with regard to the church’s mission to carry out the work of Jesus on earth. In the Last Judgement, it will not find itself on the receiving end of the almighty’s rage. Hence, another essential application for the church is to deliver the message that sin must be punished while elaborating on the idea that justice is driven by love. The holiness of God is a term used in the Bible in order to define his power and righteousness. Hence, understanding the multifaceted nature of the divine is critical to comprehend the doctrine of God. The interconnection of love and wrath with holiness and justice is the foundation for interpreting the Scripture. The Christian church is to clarify and defend specific conclusions with regard to God’s love and punishment. In particular, the difference in the theological frameworks, such as the unitary account and the divergent account, presents a challenge for comprising a holistic picture of the doctrine of God. Hence, it is essential to explain the reasoning behind the Almighty’s actions and emphasize his trinitarian essence.

Conclusion

Strengths and Weaknesses of Varied Positions

To conclude, the strengths and weaknesses of varied positions on the doctrine of God through his love and rage should be discussed. The divergent account suggests that these two attributes are contrasting. The arguments of such an approach include the portrayal of the harsh divine punishment in the Old Testament and the lack of sufficient reasoning behind them. However, this view of God’s rage implies a lack of self-control which suggests that there is no difference in human and divine anger. Nevertheless, such a statement contradicts the principle of the Almighty’s holiness, which seeks justice and comprises both the merciful and punitive natures. The divine wrath is directed against sin and wrongdoers, which complies with the principle of God’s righteousness. This perspective is embodied within the unitary account whose primary argument is the loving and providential purpose of the Lord. This ethic suggests that God avoids severe retribution and acts in accordance with the initial purpose. The weakness of this paradigm lies in the inconsistencies found in the portrayal of the divine attributes in the Old Testament and the New Testament.

Implications for the Interpretation of the Tenets of Christianity

Overall, several major implications for the interpretation of the tenets of Christianity can be made. The doctrine of God is complex and difficult to comprehend due to the difference in interpretation of the Scripture. Evidence was found revealing God as the absolute being marked both by love and wrath. Widespread denial of the doctrine of anger can be observed, along with the emphasis placed on love. Such an approach can involve a distorted view of God and imply an incompatibility between these two characteristics. However, the divine attributes should be viewed as integral and inseparable from the essence of the Almighty, whose holiness defines his commitment to maintaining justice.

Bibliography

Brewbaker, William. “God, Justice and Law: Reflections on Christian Legal Thought.” Law, Culture and the Humanities 9, no. 1 (2013): 13-25.

Carson, Donald Arthur. “God’s Love and God’s Wrath.” Bibliotheca Sacra 156 (1999): 387-398.

Edwards, Jonathan. Heaven is a World of Love. Wheaton: Crossway, 2020.

Holmes, Stephen. The Quest for the Trinity: The Doctrine of God in Scripture, History, and Modernity. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2012.

Kegler, Emmy. One Coin Found: How God’s Love Stretches to the Margins. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2019.

Kinghorn, Kevin, and Stephen Travis. But What About God’s Wrath? The Compelling Love Story of Divine Anger. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2019.

McCarthy, Michael. “Divine Wrath and Human Anger: Embarrassment Ancient and New.” Theological Studies 70, no. 4 (2009): 845-874.

McGuiggan, Jim. Celebrating the Wrath of God: Reflections on the Agony and the Ecstasy of His Relentless Love. New York: Crown Publishing Group, 2010.

Oakes, Robert. “The Wrath of God.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 27, no. 3 (1990): 129-140.

Storms, C. Samuel. The Grandeur of God: A Theological and Devotional Study of the Divine Attributes. Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2019.

Wessling, Jordan. “How does a Loving God Punish? On the Unification of God’s Love and Punitive Wrath.” International Journal of Systematic Theology 19, no. 4 (2017): 421-443.

Wessling, Jordan. Love Divine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.

Yoder, Perry. Shalom: The Bible’s word for salvation, justice, and peace. Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2017.

Zahnd, Brian. Sinners in the Hands of a Loving God: The Scandalous Truth of the Very Good News. New York: Crown Publishing Group, 2017.