Hernandez vs. Texas as a Race and Ethnicity Case Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Introduction

Despite being one of the foundational principles of the American legal standards, the notion of every ethnicity and nationality having legal rights in the American legal context was quite hard-won. Due to the landmark case of Hernandez v. Texas, the notion that every single citizen of the U.S. despite their unrelated characteristics was entitled to the same amount of legal protection. Thus, the court ruling established the principles of equality and, more specifically, the idea of equal protection as the principal American right to which every citizen was entitled.

Main body

The case in which Hernandez participated was rather simple; according to its details, required that a Mexican American should receive the same extent and number of rights that an average American does (“Hernandez v. Texas (1954)”). Specifically, the case involved a murder trial during which Hernandez strived to prove that him being Mexican American should not impact the jury’s decision in locating the murderer of Joel Espinoza, as the man whom he allegedly shot (“Hernandez v. Texas (1954)”).

Despite the presence of strong evidence that indicated that Hernandez was to blame for the death of Espinoza, the fact that his conviction was initially based purely on his ethnic identity served as the starting point for the case to be launched (“Hernandez v. Texas (1954)”). Therefore, the fact that his nationality served as the main factor in arresting him made it possible for Hernandez to appeal for the reconsideration of his case.

The case of Hernandez v. Texas represents the ideas expressed in the 14th Amendment quite accurately. Namely, the 14th Amendment argues that every citizen of the United States is entitled to the same number of rights, no matter what the race, personal beliefs, or any other personal characteristic might be (“Hernandez v. Texas (1954)”). Therefore, as a Mexican person, Hernandez had the right for his ethnicity and culture to be represented among the jury members to ensure the fairness of the trial. Without the ethnic perspective added to the jury, the decision thereof would have been rather biased and could not have reflected the actual situation.

The case of Hernandez v. Texas illustrates quite graphically how the U.S. perceived the notions of race and ethnicity in the 1950s. Specifically, the very fact that a case like Hernandez v. Texas exists indicates that the justice system of the U.S. of the 1950s was two-class-oriented. Specifically, the legal standards set by the Constitution and the amendments implied the presence of two key races, which were European and African American, thus excluding the ethnicities such s Mexican (“Hernandez v. Texas (1954)”).

The resulting failure to recognize the rights of the specified ethnic minority and other ethnic groups underrepresented in the U.S. led to major misunderstandings and infringements upon the rights of minority groups, as in the case of Hernandez. Texas showed. Thus, the case under analysis became a landmark due to the focus on equality for every ethnic minority in the U.S.

In light of the statements made above, the court ruling in the case under analysis indicated that major change was taking place in the American legal system. Recognizing Hernandez’s claim as valid and allowing for a retrial that involved a team of jury representatives of Hernandez’s ethnicity, the verdict showed that the importance o diversity and representation was finally being recognized. Therefore, the court ruling in Hernandez v. Texas should be considered a crucial step in fighting for equal rights.

Conclusion

Although the case of Hernandez v. Texas is quite easy to underestimate, it laid the foundation for the effective teaching of diverse groups. By pointing out the flaws in the American legal and educational systems, Hernandez created a safer setting for receiving appropriate medical services. Namely, the author emphasized that, even with an all-white jury, Hernandez managed to win the case and prove that his skin color had nothing to do with the murder for which society wanted to hold him accountable.

Work Cited

The American Yawp Reader, n.d. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, July 2). Hernandez vs. Texas as a Race and Ethnicity Case. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hernandez-vs-texas-as-a-race-and-ethnicity-case/

Work Cited

"Hernandez vs. Texas as a Race and Ethnicity Case." IvyPanda, 2 July 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/hernandez-vs-texas-as-a-race-and-ethnicity-case/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Hernandez vs. Texas as a Race and Ethnicity Case'. 2 July.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Hernandez vs. Texas as a Race and Ethnicity Case." July 2, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hernandez-vs-texas-as-a-race-and-ethnicity-case/.

1. IvyPanda. "Hernandez vs. Texas as a Race and Ethnicity Case." July 2, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hernandez-vs-texas-as-a-race-and-ethnicity-case/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Hernandez vs. Texas as a Race and Ethnicity Case." July 2, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hernandez-vs-texas-as-a-race-and-ethnicity-case/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1