The provided article is an effective tool for action calling as the author integrates many communicative techniques. Mizner starts her writing by introducing the reader to the lives of indigenous people harvesting rice. Then, she slowly begins to demonstrate the environmental and humanitarian problems caused by the industrial company. Throughout the work, she also uses active voice to strengthen her communication and keep it concise. In addition, in the article, the author uses data from environmental workers and scientists about the consequences of building pipelines in northern Minnesota. She emphasizes the vast effect of Enbridge’s actions on the local land and the Anishnaabe people.
The motivation behind composing correspondence is to get the reader’s consideration and make the statement clear. The writer assists the reader with understanding their point of view on a subject. An individual might need to utilize words like gain, asset, backing, or support to arrive at social change and shape the reader’s attitude. These can assist with engaging the way that they have something to provide to get a change going. The words such as ‘blockades,’ ‘strikes,’ ‘protests,’ and ‘direct appeals’ are highlighted to illustrate the people’s reaction to the current situation and the significance of the issue (Mizner, 2021). Lastly, Mizner (2021) includes the quotes from the indigenous dwellers of the affected area where their feelings are well-integrated to invoke the readers’ emotions. For instance, by the end of the article, the author adds the words of the member of protestors stating, “It’s a big web of life, and we can’t let a foreign company invade our habitat” (Mizner, 2021). This line helps Mizner to influence the reader to become imbued with feelings for the Anishnaabian situation.
Reference
Mizner, L. S. (2021). Enbridge’s Line 3 is putting wild rice at risk-and indigenous water protectors are taking a stand. Civil Eats. Web.