The development of globalized communities introduces tangible shifts to the marketing and economic systems. Workers all over the world become aware of the new tendencies in exploring the employed environment. They are more independent and goal-oriented in the search for privileged job positions. The shifts in awareness are largely predetermined by changes in ideological and political outlooks on the education and flexibility.
Indeed, the rise of the globalization process has triggered technological change, which, in its turn, has affected today’s economy. As a result, the focus on high skilled workers, introduction of advanced technologies and products, and globalized vision of the development of economies identify future development of employment opportunities. Globalization, therefore, has a potent impact on the working environment in terms of employment expansion rates, technological change, and economic goals.
Reevaluation of the working landscape is indispensible for employers and policymakers to respond to these revolutionary trends. The necessity of mapping the perspectives of workforce increases as far as external factors are concerned. On the one hand, many employees are ready to meet new opportunities and access new professional challenges to achieve their purposes. On the other hand, many workers largely depend on labor union, government, and large corporations ensuring security and protection.
The emerged discrepancy, therefore, leads to reconsideration of priorities that employment expansion establishes at the threshold of the millennium.
In this respect, Judi and D’Amico argue, “…more and more individuals now undertake journeys through the labor force, rather than “hitching rides” on the traditional mass transportation provided by unions, large corporations, and government bureaucracies” (233). Hence, for workers, the emerged possibility can become a challenge because not all of them are ready to face the employment expansion.
Technological change is considered the main consequence of globalization. It has also transformed significantly the principles and mode of production, as well as has reconstructed the overall working process. On the one hand, the process of automation can replace manual labor and lead to the increase in job positions. On the other hand, the introduction of sophisticated products creates new opportunities for high-skilled and ambitious employees who are ready to advance their knowledge and enter new training programs.
To underline the importance of such perspectives, Friedman notes, “there will be plenty of good jobs out there in the flat world for people with the right knowledge, skills, ideas, and self-motivation to seize them” (239). Every American is now free to choose whether they should depend on labor corporations or shape his/her own path of professional development. Technological change, therefore, makes both employers and employees reassess their opportunities, perspectives, and experiences.
Aside from new modes of production, technological innovation blurs the gender and race boundaries. Focusing on brain as the priority in applying for a job position provides women and elder generations with a possibility to enter the profession. At the same time, low-skilled and unskilled workers face serious competition and can be put aside the current employment market.
The relocation of priorities is largely predetermined by the emerging economic and global trends that have also led to re-evaluation of employees who has not acquired the necessary skills and knowledge in a technologically biased environment. Consequences of inadequate education, as well as extreme divergence in goals and objectives, make the working landscape even more challengeable.
Indeed, the globalization process has not only affected the production field, but has given rise to the emergence of new requirements to individuals. Thinking globally, therefore, is the main condition to succeed in the new realm and be able to compete with other skilled workers. According to Freeman, “In the United States, new middle jobs are coming into being all the time; that is why we don’t have large-scale unemployment, despite the flattening of the world” (241).
The problem is that not all workers are willing to change their stereotypes and conservative outlooks to fit the requirements of the globalized community. Rather, they prefer to stay ‘anchored’ to the local production. Combined effects of automation and globalization provide fresh insights into the employment market and introduce new requirements for the employees.
In conclusion, it should be stressed that globalization has a potent impact on the new vision of employed environment in the 21st century due to the changing patterns of production and consumption. More and more employees are more concerned with the individual opportunities due to the wider access they receive to education and professional self-development.
At the same time, workers who are reluctant to be promoted find it challengeable to enter the globalized community. In addition, because globalization presupposes technological change and automation, a strict division of workers on high skilled, low skilled, and unskilled has emerged.
The modern employment market prefers individuals with the right knowledge, ideas, and insights to those whose thinking is bound to previous patterns of production. Finally, new modes of production and export orientation also provide shift to the existing mechanisms of workforce implementation and, therefore, the leading economies should think over creating the new middle class of workers with high potential and global awareness.
Works Cited
Friedman, Thomas. “The Untouchables.” Writing and Reading across the Curriculum, 11th ed. Eds. Laurence Behrens and Leonard J. Rosen. Boston: Pearson, 2011. 238-241. Print.
Judy, Richard, W. and Carol D’Amico. “Work and Workers in the Twenty-first Century.” Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum, 11th ed. Eds. Laurence Behrens and Leonard J. Rosen. Boston: Pearson, 2011. 233-237. Print.