Jay Cohen’s Gambling Company and American Laws Case Study

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Was Jay Cohen’s conviction justified?

Even though a huge chunk of humankind shares sheer disapproval of gambling, no matter in what form the latter comes, no one can actually help feeling slight ambiguity concerning the notorious Jay Cohen’s case. According to what the existing records say, Jay Cohen was accused of managing a gambling company in Antigua and Barbuda by the government of the United States according to the U.S. laws on gambling. Disregarding the controversy concerning the harmful effects of gambling, one might want to ask the question concerning whether the USA had the right to question the policies of other states, even on such a dubious issue as gambling.

Therefore, Jay Cohen’s fault should be considered on the merits of its harmful effect on gamblers. From the given point of view, Cohen must be found guilty. Even taking the Antigua and Barbuda law on gambling, since the game was being held online, it should be regarded as an international event, in which case it must be in line with all existing laws on gambling. That being said, Cohen’s crime is obvious.

Do you concur with the dispute settlement decisions in the World Trade Organization in this case? The panel report? The appellate decision? The arbitration ruling?

I believe that in the case in point, the settlement decisions in the WTO seem excessively liberationist. While it is necessary to admit some freedom to private entrepreneurship, introducing ethics to their business practices is crucial as well. The Panel Report seems to fall into another extreme by supporting any initiative of private enterprises, which does not seem right either. The appellate decision concerning the USA government’s infringement of entrepreneurs’ rights seems legit in the given case, which, together with the arbitration’s ruling, made Cohen a victim of overly strict laws. The given outcome seems wrong, however. It is important to give freedom to private companies, yet it is essential to make sure that they do not abuse the freedoms.

Should Antigua And Barbuda have the right to retaliate against the United States by exporting copyrighted entertainment material? Is that a bad precedent?

The issue in question is, doubtlessly, a bad precedent, since no crime should be answered by another crime.

Should the United States have abrogated its commitment to gambling services under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)? Did it have better alternatives?

In the given case, abrogating its commitment to gambling services under the GATS would have made the U.S. admit that the policy on allowing gambling must be launched, which would be rather undesirable. The U.S. might have taken much pressure off, yet it would have lost much of its reputation.

How can the dispute between the United States and Antigua and Barbuda be resolved now?

Since in the given argument, the USA represents a more radical and much harsher point of view on the issue, while Antigua and Barbuda regulators do not see the reasons for concerns about gambling, whether it is online or offline, the two states clearly represent two extremes concerning the gambling issue. At present, there are two possible avenues for the problem in question. The first solution would be to ban gambling as an activity. Another idea that can be used to approach the issue is to search for the compromise, i.e., impose even harsher restrictions on the gambling industry, such as raising the age at which a person can enter a game from the supposed eighteen to full twenty-one, as well as creating a series of PSAs concerning gambling and its effects.

Do you Support the proposed Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act? Why or why not?

I believe that allowing gambling is a regressive step that can be viewed on par with allowing online pirating. However, since at present, there is no alternative for the provided solution, the Internet Gambling Regulation can be viewed as a temporary solution.

Are current state and federal laws on gambling optimal? Should the nation move in the direction of stricter prohibition? Or should it move to more permissive laws, including those to legalize online gambling?

Designing the gambling laws, one must take into account the reasons that make people gambling, since blindly prohibiting or allowing gambling will result only in having even more casinos and online sites open, either as a protest or as a result of being allowed statewide. Therefore, it must be admitted that the current laws on gambling leave much to be desired. While it is a wise move to allow gambling, it is still required to control it, making sure that gambling will not sweep the entire nation.

While to provide democracy, one must make the laws on gambling more permissive, it is required to spread the word concerning its harmful effects, therefore, stressing that gambling, much like smoking, is a matter of one’s own choice depending on how one view his/her own personal development.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, February 12). Jay Cohen's Gambling Company and American Laws. https://ivypanda.com/essays/jay-cohens-gambling-company-and-american-laws/

Work Cited

"Jay Cohen's Gambling Company and American Laws." IvyPanda, 12 Feb. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/jay-cohens-gambling-company-and-american-laws/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Jay Cohen's Gambling Company and American Laws'. 12 February.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Jay Cohen's Gambling Company and American Laws." February 12, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/jay-cohens-gambling-company-and-american-laws/.

1. IvyPanda. "Jay Cohen's Gambling Company and American Laws." February 12, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/jay-cohens-gambling-company-and-american-laws/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Jay Cohen's Gambling Company and American Laws." February 12, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/jay-cohens-gambling-company-and-american-laws/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1