Labor and Monopoly. Human Rights Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Written by Human No AI

Remarkably, each type of job has its positive and negative sides. People ensure that they join careers that have minimal adverse factors. For instance, one can view three types of jobs, which are flight attendant (pay=23.50), IT helpdesk specialist (pay=22.75), and factory production worker (pay=17.25). Working as a factory production manager has low pay, and many managers experience financial challenges. Simultaneously, the laborers do not enjoy any control on design and production over the work, thus, the staff are uncomfortable with their work. However, tech support is more simplified and, therefore, has higher productivity, and the pay is average; thus, workers can perform their duties diligently. Lastly, the flight attendant job has increased wages and is imperative to many people in the modern world. Consequently, I would prefer to work as an IT helpdesk specialist as I will work on what can improve my skills and help me reach my goals.

First and foremost, alienation, as per Karl Marx’s theory, humans do not have any freedom, and their dignity is lowered to that of human beings. Thus, the best case example among the three jobs of this issue is factory production, whereby the laborers perform their duties to enable them to acquire resources to limit economic hardships (Musto, 2010). In the other two positions, the workers are mainly propelled by other factors. For example, flight attendants do their jobs irrespective of experiencing challenges at work. At the same time, tech support performs a specific function only. Understandably, this issue is made direr as factory workers are mostly forced to feel satisfied to their work since most of them are not comfortable with their duties. Moreover, Factory workers may experience challenges such as unsafe and unhealthy environments, low pay, and long exhausting working hours. Thus, a factory production worker faces various challenges, which makes the position not favorable for me.

Second, there is taylorization as applied by the prominent academician Taylor. According to the researchers, workers should not only work hard but optimize what they do (Sacco, 2019). Working as a factory employee, individuals are forced to perform duties while not optimizing their strengths. As a flight attendant, it does not apply to scientific management as it does not include simplifying and optimizing different jobs. Therefore, Taylorism is best viewed in tech support as one can specialize and optimize one specific issue. Thus, making it my perfect job ensures that one’s skills are mainly portrayed and used in a specific field.

Lastly, there is emotional labor basing my claim on Hochschild. In his argument, he viewed this case as the direst. It included managing one’s emotions, especially the intense negative effects of this issue. Most people cannot handle their challenges, and notably, this has been a significant issue in society (Willig, 2017). Therefore, in factory production and tech support, there is minimal influence of emotions. However, in the case of flight attendants, the profession is different in the way workers do their jobs. They must be able to handle their emotions in the best way, not to affect the passengers in what is happening to them. They must always have a smile on their faces as they are doing their jobs.

In conclusion, I would choose the tech support job. I analyzed the job based on all the concepts above to understand it better and what it entailed. I was able to choose it because it gave me the confidence to work and gain more cash. I could do my job in the best way as there no factors hindering or influencing my working criteria. On the contrary, other positions such as factory workers and flight attendants have many requirements that I deem unfit for me. I cannot engage in anything that I am not conversant with as it might affect how I can perform my functions in the best way possible.

References

Musto, M. (2010). Revisiting Marx’s concept of alienation. Socialism and Democracy, 24(3), 79-101.

Sacco, S. J. (2019). The Craft of Kits: Mechanization without Taylorization (Doctoral dissertation, Loyola University Chicago).

Willig, R. (2017). An interview with Arlie Russell Hochschild: Citique as emotion. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(7-8), 189-196.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, June 30). Labor and Monopoly. Human Rights. https://ivypanda.com/essays/labor-and-monopoly-human-rights/

Work Cited

"Labor and Monopoly. Human Rights." IvyPanda, 30 June 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/labor-and-monopoly-human-rights/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Labor and Monopoly. Human Rights'. 30 June.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Labor and Monopoly. Human Rights." June 30, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/labor-and-monopoly-human-rights/.

1. IvyPanda. "Labor and Monopoly. Human Rights." June 30, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/labor-and-monopoly-human-rights/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Labor and Monopoly. Human Rights." June 30, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/labor-and-monopoly-human-rights/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1