In the present, there is a large number of ideas, definitions, classifications, theories that touch on leadership. Scientists have made attempts to explain and categorize various aspects of this topic. This has helped conduct valuable social and organizational research of leadership styles and concepts. As a result, the assessment has led to the conclusion that leadership is a flexible process. While further exploration of the topic expands, prior research papers are rarely, if ever, invalidated. The referenced article is aimed at reviewing literature depicting various leadership theories.
In order to review said theories and styles, various sources and historical events were reviewed. This method of assessing the two not only helps depict the flaws and advantages but examine the development in the concept of leadership throughout history (Nawaz & Khan, 2016). Moreover, this methodology aims at differentiating between the various styles and theories, as some of them may have similarities, such as democracy or the emphasis on a leader’s innate qualities.
After the assessment, it has been discovered that leadership is a far more complex topic than one may assume. First, relying on innate qualities does not guarantee a good leader, as dictators like Hitler and Napoleon have proven. Second, it has been shown that the differences between leaders and non-leaders are minor (Nawaz & Khan, 2016). Third, researchers have noted that simply reading about the topic is not enough, as leadership is “more tribal than scientific” (Nawaz & Khan, 2016). Fourth, it has been discovered that out of the three kinds of leaders (laissez-faire, autocratic and democratic), laissez-faire are the least useful ones, as they are not concerned about their followers’ actions and responsibilities.
In the conclusion, the article suggests avoiding referencing the Great Man theory, as it has led to the rise of notorious dictators to power. Although the writers attempt to maintain a neutral perspective of the topic, it is clear that they are in greater support of situational leadership than transformational leadership. The writers believe that with the help of this style, the leader values the desires of the follower, while assisting them in obtaining autonomy. Thus, he believes that affirmation may lead to positive results. The value of the transformational leader is emphasized by referencing Bass’ quote, who believes that such a leader motivates their followers to prioritize crucial targets over their personal needs.
Reference
Nawaz, Z. A. K. D. A., & Khan, I. (2016). Leadership theories and styles: A literature review. Leadership, 16(1), 1-7.