Management Theories and Their Permanence Research Paper

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

The permanence of theories and their validity throughout time is a relevant question that is to be separately considered in every particular case. Once established, some theories remain consistent in the course of an extended period, while others prove their inefficiency due to the change of the conditions in the current scientific environment. There are numerous cases when a research discovery serves to be either a refutation of an existing theory or, on the contrary, its substantiation. Speculatively, a theory can be everlasting unless it contradicts with the existing reality’s circumstances. Whereas some aspects of a theory can be gradually rejected, its principal postulates might still be accepted by the public and are likely to become a basis for another hypothesis’s development. One should also point out that the fact that a theory’s inconsistency in certain circumstances does not essentially signify of its complete irrelevance, but might sometimes illustrate the low level of its adaptive qualities.

While considering the permanence of a theory, it is crucial to apply efficient tools for measuring its validity. Thus, one cannot claim that a theory is inconsistent due to the distant timeframes of its foundation. Therefore, each field of science has its approaches to the theoretical validity’s evaluation (Strauss & Smith 2009). Regarding the particular case of the Bass’s theory selected as the framework for the research planned, even though its foundation dates back to the end of the nineteenth century, there are no reasons to doubt its legitimacy. The theory does not contradict with the current management principals. Moreover, its key theses have been widely applied to the advancement of other management theories of the transformational leadership character (Bass 1999).

Reference List

Bass, BM 1999, ‘Two Decades of Research and Development in

Transformational Leadership ‘, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 9-32.

Strauss, ME & Smith GT 2009, ‘Construct Validity: Advances in Theory and Methodology ‘, Annual review of clinical psychology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-25.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2020, July 4). Management Theories and Their Permanence. https://ivypanda.com/essays/management-theories-and-their-permanence/

Work Cited

"Management Theories and Their Permanence." IvyPanda, 4 July 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/management-theories-and-their-permanence/.

References

IvyPanda. (2020) 'Management Theories and Their Permanence'. 4 July.

References

IvyPanda. 2020. "Management Theories and Their Permanence." July 4, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/management-theories-and-their-permanence/.

1. IvyPanda. "Management Theories and Their Permanence." July 4, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/management-theories-and-their-permanence/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Management Theories and Their Permanence." July 4, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/management-theories-and-their-permanence/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1