Considering the information provided in the text, the author’s primary research question concerns the fact what contemporary models of mentorship might be of relevance in the given environment and how these schemes could be implemented in the already existing mentoring programs. Thus, the thesis of the research could be outlined from the citation below:
Similar stories abound of unwise and uncaring mentor/learner matches, and this is where the present threat to mentoring lies, not in ‘overkill,’ but in the misuse of the term ‘mentoring’ and in bad practice. (Bennetts, 2003, p. 65)
The following sentence implies the necessity to dwell upon the variety of today’s definitions and examples of mentoring in order to define how the relatively new model could be not only trendy but efficient. The argument that stems from such a statement claims that reconsideration of mentoring was required due to its tendency to become entrenched in the traditional relationship models. The implications of the following article include establishing full-scale mentoring programs for youth that could be supported by the government to ensure tangible outcomes of the formal mentoring schemes.
The article itself, while displaying some outdated information when compared to the modern achievements in the segment of mentoring and guidance, possesses a considerable novelty in terms of the given timeframe. Whereas many enterprises were at the point of mentorship discovery for the business, Bennetts (2003) managed to define the superficiality of the term in the vast majority of cases:
The current trend for the use of the word ‘mentoring’ may be a fad, and it is now necessary to ask how often mentoring is used as a ‘catch-all’ phrase aimed mainly at catching funding. Who benefits most, young people, or those who gain funding for new posts? (p. 74)
Considering the theoretical foundation for examining the diachronic development of mentorship development within the context of business, it might be concluded that Bennetts’s study is a valuable tool when considering the theoretical foundation for the examination of the diachronic development of mentorship development. However, the work itself lacks the analysis of primary data, implying its relevance only in combination with the conduction of empirical research in order to secure exhaustive results.
Reference
Bennetts, C. (2003). Mentoring youth: trend and tradition.British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 31(1), 63. Web.