It is with great interest that I draw your attention to the above issue since it directly affects health care policy implementation and feedback track in implementing the Obama Care, especially concerning holistic community and public health care setting. Currently, the epidemiological and economic health perspectives, which directly influence the health status of Americans, operate independently within this bill. Basically, the epidemiological perspective views health services as insignificant in examining health status on the parameters of lifestyle, social, and economic factors. It dwells on the cause of a disease and care outcome. The economic perspective examines health service determinants such as expenditure, financing, and mobilizing funds for these services.
Despite the controversy it courted, the Obama Care has presented a comprehensive health policy that mainly adopts redistribution economics to ensure that every American is covered under the scheme. Despite initial rejection by a section of Americans, the policy carried the day as it promised to make health very affordable to the low-income groups. At present, the only challenge is implementation since it will have to cover very many people within balanced epidemiological and economic health perspectives.
Quality aspects within the bill should have a target monitoring unit and active reporting channel during implementation. Though very complex, the congress committee should be intrinsic of the demand and supply in the market, social, and public against a backdrop of manageable cost constraints to balance the activities of profit and non-profit entities. This will ensure sustainability when implementing the Obama Care from the lenses of epidemiological and economic health perspectives.
The main components of the policy that should be addressed include quantifiable viability, ease of implementation, and realization of the intended goals when applied in the sensitive community and public health care setting. This will cover the entire target population and provide room for expansion of the access and quality of care for the vulnerable groups.
The main types of efficiencies that congress may introduce in this policy include ‘allocative’ and technical efficiency. The committee should include the interests of the special group in either of the facilities when implementing the Obama Care, especially within the community and public health care setting. The rationale for this recommendation is that disadvantaged groups strain to get healthcare services due to the low-income bracket. Often these groups exist within the larger population. Including their interests will provide a balance between profit-making and addressing the health care needs as elements of the social pillar. Besides, the need for cost-effective healthcare management against a backdrop of affirmative action-based affordable services as enlisted in the Obama Care will alter the outcome of this noble idea.
This proposal of merging the epidemiological and economic health perspectives aims at providing value for every monetary unit spent in healthcare provision, even within the affirmative policies to guard the interests of the vulnerable groups. This will monitor compliance to target persons within the Obama Care bill. Besides, accelerating alternatives in allocating service fees payment may facilitate the provision of services within affordable bundles at efficiency levels for the vulnerable groups.
I am hopeful that the above concerns will be addressed.